Mass. Supreme Court: Subway 'upskirt' photos not illegal
Announcement
Collapse
Civics 101 Guidelines
Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less
Another court decision...
Collapse
X
-
Another court decision...
That's what
- She
Without a clear-cut definition of sin, morality becomes a mere argument over the best way to train animals
- Manya the Holy Szin (The Quintara Marathon)
I may not be as old as dirt, but me and dirt are starting to have an awful lot in common
- Stephen R. DonaldsonTags: None
-
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostSeems like it would go under some stalking or peeping tom law.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Outis View PostDepends on how the law is phrased. Most "peeping tom" laws that I am aware of are phrased to protect you in your home, or in other places where you have an expectation of privacy. Because of the way the laws were phrased, this slimebag got away with it.The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostA woman should not have a reasonable expectation of privacy up her skirt?
What a loser.
ETA: Just to be abundantly clear, I'm calling the creep in the news story a loser, not you, CP.I DENOUNCE DONALD J. TRUMP AND ALL HIS IMMORAL ACTS.
Comment
-
I foresee a legislative remedy in Massachusetts very soon."I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View PostSeveral women should get together, corner the guy, pull down his pants and take a picture of him in his underwear, then put up posters of him all over the subway saying "Have you seen this pervert?"The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Recently here in Atlanta some guy was taking pictures up the skirt of a woman in a store -- until her boyfriend saw him and seriously decked him. He was not charged (the boyfriend that is -- the pervert was arrested when the police examined the photos on his cellphone).
I'm always still in trouble again
"You're by far the worst poster on TWeb" and "TWeb's biggest liar" --starlight (the guy who says Stalin was a right-winger)
"Overall I would rate the withdrawal from Afghanistan as by far the best thing Biden's done" --Starlight
"Of course, human life begins at fertilization that’s not the argument." --Tassman
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostRecently here in Atlanta some guy was taking pictures up the skirt of a woman in a store -- until her boyfriend saw him and seriously decked him. He was not charged (the boyfriend that is -- the pervert was arrested when the police examined the photos on his cellphone).I DENOUNCE DONALD J. TRUMP AND ALL HIS IMMORAL ACTS.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostA woman should not have a reasonable expectation of privacy up her skirt?
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogue06 View PostRecently here in Atlanta some guy was taking pictures up the skirt of a woman in a store -- until her boyfriend saw him and seriously decked him. He was not charged (the boyfriend that is -- the pervert was arrested when the police examined the photos on his cellphone).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Outis View Post"Expectation of privacy" is a legal term defined by the person's location or situation, not by their state of dress.
Which is a fancy way of saying that the mass laws were well-intended, but the guy found a loophole. As Zymologist states, it's a "retarded technicality."The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cow Poke View PostYes, Outis, I'm well aware of that, but thanks for the "lesson".
Agreed -- I'd like to actually see their codified ordinance, rather than a summary, but a friend is picking me up for fish tacos, and there ARE priorities!
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seer, Yesterday, 11:06 AM
|
3 responses
112 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Sam
Yesterday, 05:00 PM
|
||
Started by carpedm9587, Yesterday, 07:03 AM
|
16 responses
93 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Mountain Man
Yesterday, 02:40 PM
|
||
Started by rogue06, 05-17-2024, 09:51 AM
|
0 responses
20 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by rogue06
05-17-2024, 09:51 AM
|
||
Started by seer, 05-16-2024, 05:00 PM
|
0 responses
32 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seer
05-16-2024, 05:00 PM
|
||
Started by seer, 05-16-2024, 11:43 AM
|
219 responses
890 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seer
Today, 09:34 AM
|
Comment