PDA

View Full Version : Ecumenism and Catholic Charismatics


Bill S
February 23rd 2003, 05:35 PM
Hi, Im new here. Im a trinity Pentecostal who believes in the security of the believer and and send out reports on revival and ecumenism with Catholics and liberal protestants. Following is a personal testimony. I will have to make it in two posts.

My Testimony of Working with Charismatic Catholics

Bill Scudder Dayton, Ohio, USA
Azusa@aol.com

I would like to say first of all that I am not a Cecessionist. I do not believe the Gifts of the Holy Spirit ceased with the New Testament Apostles. They are available to the Church of God today.

For those who do not believe the above, you are still my brother or sister in the Lord if you believe that we are saved by grace alone through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ alone. What I am about to tell you is not 'politically correct' and I will be labeled as 'intolerant' or maybe even a 'basher' by some people. I love Catholics, as I do anyone else, but it is the doctrine's of Rome that is deceiving many.


**************

President of the FGBMF-Peoria, Illinois

It started when I was voted in as President of a local chapter of the Full Gospel Businessmen's Fellowship International. We had a dinner meeting once a month and a breakfast meeting once a month. At the dinner meeting we would usually invite a Christian businessman to give his testimony. We began to hold a Bible study and prayer meeting in my home.

The word got out, and some Catholics began to come to my home prayer and Bible study meeting, including a priest. The first thing this priest did was kneel in front of me, as if I could impart something to him. Later I knew that he wanted me to pray that he would receive tongues. I became a friend with this Priest and we began to attend other meetings together. More Catholics started coming to all of our meetings and I invited a Catholic professor from Ball State University to come and speak to our fellowship.

It wasn't long until many of these Catholics were seeking and receiving tongues. At the time I just took it for granted that they were already saved and were receiving the Baptism of the Holy Spirit. Priests, nuns and others were beginning to receive tongues. I was guilty of believing that tongues was an indication that we shared the same Holy Spirit experience, and the same Jesus. This was due to my ignorance of the 'Gospel according to Rome,' for which I have no excuse.

I was invited to teach a course one night a week for six weeks in a Roman Catholic Parish, St. Monica In East Peoria, Illinois. Priests, nuns and others were present. I taught on the gift of Salvation. At the time I was not prepared for what I was confronting and because all present at the meetings deemed themselves already saved because of the Roman Catholic religion. I don't believe I addressed the subject in the right way. There was a spirit of bondage given to them by Rome and they had a dependence on their infant baptism and other doctrines of Rome which nullify the Gospel.

I was invited to attend Catholic Charismatic prayer meetings at Bradley University as the only non-Catholic present.

One of the Catholic prayer groups were speaking in tongues and receiving unbiblical interpretations of a sinful nature, supposedly coming direct from Mary, 'the mother
of Jesus'. Which was further proof that the unsaved were receiving 'tongues' from a spirit other than God. Charismatic Catholics often become more devoted to Mary after receiving a tongue.

MARY BECOMES THE FOCUS

Many Catholic Charismatics have migrated to Mary, whom they see as the Holy Spirit's 'more interesting spouse.' The Catholic Charismatic fellowship at Dayton University reported to the news media that since their 'experience' they have been giving more devotion to Mary. In the statement nothing was said about Christ.

That does not mean that we do not honor Mary at all for her physical part in the birth of
Christ but we cannot venerate her more than the scriptures allow or make her in any way Spiritually responsible for our salvation.

Universalism

A Catholic Priest who was a sought after speaker in the Catholic Charismatic movement and spoke at many FGBMFI chapters, was speaking one night to a large group during one of our FGBMFI conventions. After his talk he gave an altar call to come and be 'born again.' I had an uneasy feeling, and after the service was over, I approached to ask him some questions. I asked him if Jesus was the only way to be saved, and he said very plainly, 'NO.' I asked, 'Do you have to be born again and believe in Jesus Christ to be saved and he said 'NO.' What did he mean by 'born again'?

It was obvious he meant that if you received tongues or any kind of subjective feeling, that this was proof of being born again, having nothing to do with being born from above by the Spirit of God or believing in Christ alone for salvation.

At that point I rebuked him for what he said and he got very angry and began to shake. I reported him to FGBMFI but nothing came of it. There are several kinds of Roman Catholics. The Catholic church is not as united as they would like everyone to believe. There is the liberal that believes God is the Father of all and no-one is lost and the one that believes that if you do good works and are baptised you will be saved and the conservative Catholic that believes that only through the Roman Catholic church can you be saved. Then there are all those in between.

((The Roman Catholic religion in its quest for ecumenism is now playing both sides as is seen in Vatican II. ""....

An article published by the Dallas Morning News on Saturday March 20th, 1999 of an ecumenical meeting held in Dallas, Thanksgiving World Assembly, shows the other side.

What is important about this meeting is that it was attended by a Nigerian Cardinal of the Roman Catholic religion named Francis Arinze.

Many people think that Arinze, the Pope’s Deputy for Outreach, is heir apparent to John Paul II. But even if he is not, his comments are chilling and revealing.

An illustration of Roman Catholic ecumenism, which ices out the Gospel and makes mockery of the ministry of Jesus Christ, is found in Arinze’s answer to the question, "Can you still get to heaven without accepting Jesus?"His answer, not surprising, but chilling and ominous, is: "Expressly, yes!"

He says"".....Gods grant of salvation includes not only Christians but Jews,Muslims, Hindus and people of good will." ))

WHAT DOES THE POPE HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THIS?

Note the following quote (Dallas Morning News, 12-09-00):

“Tempering a controversial Vatican declaration on salvation, Pope John Paul II said Wednesday that all who live a just life will be saved even if they do not believe in Jesus Christ and the Roman Catholic Church.”

By Peggy Polk
and Robert Nowell

VATICAN CITY, Dec. 6 (RNS)--Tempering a controversial Vatican declaration on salvation, Pope John Paul II said Wednesday that all who live a just life will be saved even if they do not believe in Jesus Christ and the Roman Catholic Church.

The Pope blatantly contradicts the Bible

© 2000 Discerning the Times Digest and NewsBytes
On March 26, 2000.
The popular Catholic Pope John Paul II blatantly contradicted the Bible on December 7 when he proclaimed "Heaven is open to all as long as they are good," even for "those who ignore Christ and his Church." The Bible clearly teaches only those who have accepted Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior will go to heaven and the Father.

The December 8, Electronic Telegraph reported the Pope as saying that "Heaven is open to all as long as they are good."

POPE'S WORDS BEFORE THE "ANGELUS", VATICAN CITY, OCT. 1, 2000 (ZENIT.org)
3. The Holy Spirit is not only present in other religions through authentic expressions of prayer. “The Spirit’s presence and activity”, as I wrote in the Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, “affect not only individuals but also society and history, peoples, cultures and religions” (n. 28).Normally, “it will be in the sincere practice of what is good in their own religious traditions and by following the dictates of their own conscience that the members of other religions respond positively to God’s invitation and receive salvation in Jesus Christ, even while they do not recognize or acknowledge him as their Saviour (cf. Ad gentes, nn. 3, 9, 11)” (Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue

CONTINUED

Jin-Roh
February 23rd 2003, 08:18 PM
The Roman Chruch still has some wierd stuff going on man.

I think its going deteriote into a protestant-theology type camp with the other camp being absorbed into a new-world religion.

George Blaisdell
February 23rd 2003, 11:38 PM
Bill S. writes:

"Which was further proof that the unsaved were receiving 'tongues' from a spirit other than God."

Well, it sure looks like the "gift of tongues" adapts itself to the theology of those who speak in them, such that the Roman Catholics speak the tongues of Mariology, and you speak tongue of bibliology, and others will speak the tongues variously according to their beliefs...

And it does not seem to be enough for one party speaking tongues to label another party speaking tongues with whom the first one disagrees as "unsaved"... The very fact that all the "tongues" are speaking according to the beliefs of those speaking them is itself suspicious, and if you were the one "giving" this gift to others, and this is what you are getting, then it would appear that you have indeed been gifted by the Holy Spirit, Who is telling you something...

And it would appear that the message from the Holy Spirit is that it is not the Holy Spirit who is speaking the tongues....

geo

ItalianGold
February 24th 2003, 12:22 AM
Bill S.

I'm afraid I don't understand why you are posting here. It was my understanding that this web is open to dicussions (not rants and one-sided attacks) of all religions, in fact to all world views including non-believers. I find it offensive that your first post in this wonderful site is one of condemnation and suspect testimony.


But that's just my opinion.

spl_cadet
February 24th 2003, 12:28 AM
02-23-2003 @ 01:35 PM
Bill S:

For those who do not believe the above, you are still my brother or sister in the Lord if you believe that we are saved by grace alone through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ alone. What I am about to tell you is not 'politically correct' and I will be labeled as 'intolerant' or maybe even a 'basher' by some people. I love Catholics, as I do anyone else, but it is the doctrine's of Rome that is deceiving many.

Yep, and we've been doing it for two thousand years. The fact that we are the Church founded by Christ having no basis in the truth of our doctrines of course.


This was due to my ignorance of the 'Gospel according to Rome,' for which I have no excuse.

Would you mind telling us just what that is? Because I'd had a different version of the "Gospel according to Rome" told to me by every Protestant.


One of the Catholic prayer groups were speaking in tongues and receiving unbiblical interpretations of a sinful nature, supposedly coming direct from Mary, 'the mother
of Jesus'. Which was further proof that the unsaved were receiving 'tongues' from a spirit other than God. Charismatic Catholics often become more devoted to Mary after receiving a tongue.

Would you mind telling us what these messages were?


Many Catholic Charismatics have migrated to Mary, whom they see as the Holy Spirit's 'more interesting spouse.' The Catholic Charismatic fellowship at Dayton University reported to the news media that since their 'experience' they have been giving more devotion to Mary. In the statement nothing was said about Christ.

What's wrong with a devotion to Mary? Furthermore, the more devotion to Mary, the more devotion to Christ. She leads us to her Son after all.


That does not mean that we do not honor Mary at all for her physical part in the birth of
Christ but we cannot venerate her more than the scriptures allow or make her in any way Spiritually responsible for our salvation.

She rather was however. If it weren't for Mary we couldn't possibly hope to be saved.


A Catholic Priest who was a sought after speaker in the Catholic Charismatic movement and spoke at many FGBMFI chapters, was speaking one night to a large group during one of our FGBMFI conventions. After his talk he gave an altar call to come and be 'born again.' I had an uneasy feeling, and after the service was over, I approached to ask him some questions. I asked him if Jesus was the only way to be saved, and he said very plainly, 'NO.' I asked, 'Do you have to be born again and believe in Jesus Christ to be saved and he said 'NO.' What did he mean by 'born again'?

He's a heretic. The Church teaches very strongly that Christ is the only way. Unfortunately, the Modernist heresy has spread rampant throughout Christianity in the Western world.


At that point I rebuked him for what he said and he got very angry and began to shake. I reported him to FGBMFI but nothing came of it. There are several kinds of Roman Catholics. The Catholic church is not as united as they would like everyone to believe. There is the liberal that believes God is the Father of all and no-one is lost and the one that believes that if you do good works and are baptised you will be saved and the conservative Catholic that believes that only through the Roman Catholic church can you be saved. Then there are all those in between.

Not quite. There are the orthodox Catholics who follow what the Church teaches, the liberal heretics who are no more Catholic in their beliefs than the Arians, and the ultra-traditionalist schismatics. Only the orthodox Catholics actually represent the Church.


An illustration of Roman Catholic ecumenism, which ices out the Gospel and makes mockery of the ministry of Jesus Christ, is found in Arinze’s answer to the question, "Can you still get to heaven without accepting Jesus?"His answer, not surprising, but chilling and ominous, is: "Expressly, yes!"

He says"".....Gods grant of salvation includes not only Christians but Jews,Muslims, Hindus and people of good will." ))

Again, that would be an example of heresy.


<snip about pope>

I'd like to see a link to these stories along with what he actually said.


POPE'S WORDS BEFORE THE &quot;ANGELUS&quot;, VATICAN CITY, OCT. 1, 2000 (ZENIT.org)
3. The Holy Spirit is not only present in other religions through authentic expressions of prayer. “The Spirit’s presence and activity”, as I wrote in the Encyclical Letter Redemptoris missio, “affect not only individuals but also society and history, peoples, cultures and religions” (n. 28).Normally, “it will be in the sincere practice of what is good in their own religious traditions and by following the dictates of their own conscience that the members of other religions respond positively to God’s invitation and receive salvation in Jesus Christ, even while they do not recognize or acknowledge him as their Saviour (cf. Ad gentes, nn. 3, 9, 11)” (Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue

I couldn't find any such article on Zenit.org, which is cited. I'll need a link for this.

Rubia Warren
February 24th 2003, 12:39 AM
[i]02-23-2003 @ 11:28 PM



What's wrong with a devotion to Mary? Furthermore, the more devotion to Mary, the more devotion to Christ. She leads us to her Son after all.



She rather was however. If it weren't for Mary we couldn't possibly hope to be saved

Hi! Can you explain to me what you mean by these two statements? I just wanna make sure I'm understanding you correctly.

spl_cadet
February 24th 2003, 12:45 AM
02-23-2003 @ 08:39 PM
La Rubia:
Hi! Can you explain to me what you mean by these two statements? I just wanna make sure I'm understanding you correctly.

Sure. A devotion to Mary leads to a deeper being (for lack of a better term at the moment) in Christ. This link explains it better. (http://ic.net/~erasmus/RAZ136.HTM) I'm one of the least Mary devoted Catholics out there :smile:

As for the "No salvation without Mary" part, that's rather easy. No Mary (or no cooperation by her), no Jesus. No Jesus, no Salvation.

Rubia Warren
February 24th 2003, 12:55 AM
:eek: I knew that catholics hold Mary in high regard, but I didn't know that they believe that Mary was sinless and perfect since birth. Is this what most catholics believe, or just some? (Sorry for hijacking this thread! It's only for a minute.)

spl_cadet
February 24th 2003, 01:00 AM
02-23-2003 @ 08:55 PM
La Rubia:

:eek: I knew that catholics hold Mary in high regard, but I didn't know that they believe that Mary was sinless and perfect since birth. Is this what most catholics believe, or just some? (Sorry for hijacking this thread! It's only for a minute.)

We've believed that she was sinless since her conception for over a millenia and a half. It's been a required belief (proclaimed a dogma of the Church) in the mid 19th century (1850 or 54 if I remember correctly, just a few years before Lourdes).

Bill S
February 24th 2003, 10:33 AM
To George:

For every gift of God there is a counterfiet.

To WestCoast:

The reason I posted this here is because there is theology in my post. The theology of the Gospel, the doctrine of salvation. This board is titled, theology. My post was not one of condemnation but of the Gospel. If you would like to make a comment to discuss something in my testimony that you may or may not agree with then I would be happy to discuss it with you.

Blessings,

Bill

Bill S
February 24th 2003, 10:42 AM
From: Bill

One of the Catholic prayer groups were speaking in tongues and receiving unbiblical interpretations of a sinful nature, supposedly coming direct from Mary, 'the mother
of Jesus'. Which was further proof that the unsaved were receiving 'tongues' from a spirit other than God. Charismatic Catholics often become more devoted to Mary after receiving a tongue.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: SPL Cadet,


Would you mind telling us what these messages were? >>

Yes, The was a message in tongues by a Catholic and then an interpretation by a Catholic. The message was directed to a business man that they had laid hands on. The interpretation to this man from "Mary" was, that "this business man was cheating in his business, but that because of the day we live in, cheating is necessary to achieve sucess."

Like I said before there are conterfiets of the Gifts of the Holy Spirit to decieve and lead away from Christ. For every true Gift of the Holy Spirit there is a counterfiet.

Bill S
February 24th 2003, 10:49 AM
Arinze says
He says"".....Gods grant of salvation includes not only Christians but Jews,Muslims, Hindus and people of good will." ))
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Cadet writes:
Again, that would be an example of heresy.>>>

Yes, I agree but if you have been reading the prsent Pope in the last two years or so he has also said the same thing. Does that mean the Pope is a heritic?

George Blaisdell
February 24th 2003, 11:57 AM
Bill:

[QUOTE]
To George:

For every gift of God there is a counterfiet.
_________________

Well, to imagine that one possesses the "gift of God", and then passes this on in the laying on of hands, and receives what are apparent demonic results in variance of doctrines across confessional lines, would sure seem to me to invalidate one's perception of what it is that one possesses...

If such a thing happenned to me, I would conclude that I was transferring demons to the person whom I was empowering with the so called "Holy Spirit", for all that is resulting is self-validation... As is the whole idea that you have [to give in the laying on of hands] what they want to receive...

Those waters seem a tad brackish... And murky...

geo

Bill S
February 24th 2003, 12:23 PM
ThFor every gift of God there is a counterfiet.
_________________
George writes:

Well, to imagine that one possesses the "gift of God", and then passes this on in the laying on of hands, and receives what are apparent demonic results in variance of doctrines across confessional lines, would sure seem to me to invalidate one's perception of what it is that one possesses...>>>

But you see George those that are depending on experience and subjective feelings and not the Gospel and have have an over abundance adoration for who they call Mary the mother of God, have been blinded and can not see. Because of this false Mary and false Jesus they worship It blinds them to the Gospel. It is very sad. All we can do is give them the true Gospel and then leave it in Gods hands. Thank you for your thought provoking comments.
I might add that many Catholics that are caught up with "Mary" would believe almost anything that they thought she said.

Bill S
February 24th 2003, 12:25 PM
I might add that many Catholics that are caught up with "Mary" would believe almost anything that they thought she said.

George Blaisdell
February 24th 2003, 01:07 PM
02-24-2003 @ 08:23 AM
Bill S:

ThFor every gift of God there is a counterfiet.
_________________
George writes:

Well, to imagine that one possesses the &quot;gift of God&quot;, and then passes this on in the laying on of hands, and receives what are apparent demonic results...would sure seem to me to invalidate one's [gift]&gt;&gt;&gt;

> But you see George those that are depending on experience and subjective feelings and not the Gospel and have have an over abundance adoration for who they call Mary the mother of God, have been blinded and can not see.

Are you not, as a charismatic, indeed offering them the very experience and subjective feelings that you criticize them for relying upon? And are they not to have experience of the Gospel, and subjective feeling regarding it?

And if you wish to criticize them for adoring the Virgin Mary, of whom the Bible writes prophetically from her own lips: "All generations shall call me Blessed", then can you claim Biblicity?

> Because of this false Mary and false Jesus they worship It blinds them to the Gospel.

My friend, can you not see that this criticism of them is but the perception of a tiny splinter in their eye? And that until we remove the huge log of splinters out from our own eyes through long repentance, we will be unable to help those with their small ones? That we can only criticize them, and not heal them? That's Gospel...

> It is very sad.

To criticize without a cure?

> All we can do is give them the true Gospel and then leave it in Gods hands.

They are indeed best left in God's hands...

> Thank you for your thought provoking comments.

I doubtless suffer vastly more prelestial delusions than you probably ever might, and it is from these that I post to you...

I might add that many Catholics that are caught up with &quot;Mary&quot; would believe almost anything that they thought she said.

Criticizing Catholics won't help. Nor will laying your hands upon them at their request, and THEN criticizing them for the results of what it is that YOU have done... In what you have given them...

You might want to take a step back from your current focus and ask if the whole thing might be a demon-directed delusion... I do that with virtually every "experience" I have these days, and with effective results. The real power is not normally discerned at subtle levels, but in life events, where it is invisible in plain sight, and especially is invisible to me!

You see, your criticism that their "experience" is demonic is based upon their self-validation in false mariologicqal doctrine. This perception, of course, is self-validating for you - Which would seem to be the whole point of the exercise from both your perspective and that of the Catholics, so that you walk away from each other self validated and in division, all of which sounds demonically directed to me...

[And I've done far worse!]

geo

Bill S
February 24th 2003, 02:50 PM
psGeorge writes:
Are you not, as a charismatic, indeed offering them the very experience and subjective feelings that you criticize them for relying upon? And are they not to have experience of the Gospel, and subjective feeling regarding it?>>>>

From Bill:

I OFFER NOTHING BUT THE GOSPEL.
IF YOU READ MY TESTIMONY AGAIN YOU WILL SEE THAT I NEVER EMPHASIZE ANYTHING BUT CHRIST ALONE FOR SALVATION AND THE GOSPEL, NOT FEELINGS.


GEORGE WRITES
And if you wish to criticize them for adoring the Virgin Mary, of whom the Bible writes prophetically from her own lips: "All generations shall call me Blessed", then can you claim Biblicity?


BILL WRITES
GEORGE, I THINK YOU ARE MISSING THE POINT. TALKING TO MARY IN A SPRITULIST MEETING IS WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT AND YOU KNOW THAT MANY CATHOLICS WORSHIP MARY. OF COURSE SHE WAS BLESSED AND I CALL HER BLESSED BUT THAT IS AS FAR AS THE BIBLE GOES. I COULD SAY A LOT MORE ABOUT THIS BUT IN WOULD NOT BE THE THING TO DO HERE I DON'T THINK.

GEORGE WRITES

My friend, can you not see that this criticism of them is but the perception of a tiny splinter in their eye? And that until we remove the huge log of splinters out from our own eyes through long repentance, we will be unable to help those with their small ones? That we can only criticize them, and not heal them? That's Gospel...

BILL WRITES
YOU MAY CALL IT CRITICISM BUT I DO NOT. IT IS NOT A 'SMALL SPLINTER' AS YOU SAY BUT IT IS ONE THAT WILL DAMN THE SOUL BECAUSE IT LEADS THEM AWAY FROM CHRIST AND THE GOSPEL.

> It is very sad.
george writes

To criticize without a cure?

BILL WRITES

THE CURE IS THE GOSPEL AND THAT IS WHAT I GIVE. THE GOSPEL IS--Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; and that He was buried, and that He rose again the third day according to the Scriptures" (1 Cor 15:1-4). tHAT IT IS CHRIST ALONE NOT CHRIST PLUS THAT SAVES. THAT WE ARE SAVED BY GRACE ALONE THROUGH FAITH ALONE ON ACCOUNT OF CHRIST ALONE. NOT CHRIST PLUS MARY, OR CHRIST PLUS PURGATORY OR CHRIST PLUS WORKS, ECT. THAT MY FRIEND IS THE GOSPEL BUT THEY HAVE TO BELIEVE IT.

GEORGE WRITES;

Criticizing Catholics won't help. Nor will laying your hands upon them at their request, and THEN criticizing them for the results of what it is that YOU have done... In what you have given them...

BILL WRITES

WHERE DID YOU GET THE IDEA THAT I LAID MY HANDS ON THEM AND THEN CRITICIZED THE RESULTS. THEY WERE LAYING THEIR HANDS ON EACH OTHER. I HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.

GEORGE WRITES

You see, your criticism that their "experience" is demonic is based upon their self-validation in false mariologicqal doctrine. This perception, of course, is self-validating for you -

BILL WRITES

THE MARYIOLOGY WAS NOT MY FOCUS BUT YOURS. MARYIOLOGY IS ONLY ONE OF THE MANY SYMTOMS OF NOT BELIEVING THE GOSPEL.

ps. YOU CALLED ME A CHARISMATIC. I AM NOT. I AM A CLASSICAL PENTECOSTAL. I DONT LIKE THE TERM CHARISMATIC BECAUSE THAT CAN MEAN A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS. :)

George Blaisdell
February 24th 2003, 03:37 PM
BILL WRITES

WHERE DID YOU GET THE IDEA THAT I LAID MY HANDS ON THEM

Maybe I misunderstood you saying that they [Catholics] came to you to receive the gift of tongues... You do criticize them...

AND THEN CRITICIZED THE RESULTS. THEY WERE LAYING THEIR HANDS ON EACH OTHER. I HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.

Oh...

Look, I am sorry that I have intruded...

geo

Bill S
February 24th 2003, 06:21 PM
George,

I did say that a Catholic priest came to my home for me to pray for him to recieve tongues but I did not do it. The only thing I did was take him through a lot of scriptures on salvation for about an hour.

Im not sure just where you are coming from. Anyway, I think you many have been offended by talking about "Mary". I think it is time for me to call it quits on this thread unless someone has a question.

Bill S
June 11th 2004, 01:37 PM
Criticizing Catholics won't help. Nor will laying your hands upon them at their request, and THEN criticizing them for the results of what it is that YOU have done... In what you have given them...
geo


Did I say I laid hands on them for the Baptism? Not that I remember. I would only give them the Gospel/