PDA

View Full Version : Archaeology's great hoax


Bob Jenkins
October 27th 2003, 05:47 PM
http://www.religionnewsblog.com/html/4841-Archaeology_s_great_hoax.html

Item 4841 • Posted: Sun, Oct. 26 2003 • Weblogged by Religion News Blog

The Grand Rapids Press (USA), Oct. 26, 2003
http://www.mlive.com
By Pat Shellenbarger


In a storeroom of the Michigan Historical Museum, state archaeologist John Halsey examined the newly acquired artifacts purported to be the remnants of an ancient Middle Eastern civilization that settled in Michigan thousands of years ago.

He pointed to the pictures engraved on slate tablets, telling stories from the Old Testament.

Here's God directing Adam to the Garden of Eden. Here's Eve. Here's the apple tree. Here's God banishing them from the Garden. Here's Moses with the Ten Commandments. And here's a scene depicting the crucifixion of Christ.

But, wait a minute, how did that get in there?

"If you're going to tell an Old Testament story," Halsey said, "Jesus shouldn't be there."

It's one of many indications the so-called "Michigan Relics," once hailed as the greatest archaeological discoveries since Pompeii, are fakes.

"It's the physical evidence of the largest archaeological fraud in the state's history," Halsey said, then, on further reflection, he added: "It is arguably the largest archaeological fraud ever in this country, and the longest running."

More than a century after the first relics were discovered, some people still believe them to be authentic. Some influential members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (the Mormons) once considered them evidence of the church's connection to a Near Eastern culture in ancient America. The Mormon Church for decades kept a large collection of the artifacts in its Salt Lake City museum, but never formally claimed them to be genuine.

This past summer, after scholars examined the relics and declared them fakes, the church donated the 797 objects to the Michigan Historical Museum, which plans to exhibit them beginning next month.

James Scotford claimed he found the first relic -- a large clay casket -- while digging a post hole on a Montcalm County farm in October 1890. He hurried into the nearby village of Wyman to announce his discovery, touching off a frenzy of digging all over the Lower Peninsula.

Over the next 30 years, thousands more artifacts -- tiny caskets, amulets, tools, smoking pipes and tablets -- were found, including some in Kent County. The items were made of clay, copper and slate, and most bore the mark "IH/," which some interpreted as a tribal signature or a mystic symbol. Some thought it was a variation on IHS, the ancient Hebrew symbol for Jehovah.

A syndicate was formed in Stanton to corner the market and sell the items to the highest bidder, perhaps the Smithsonian Institution.

Oddly, nearly all were found when Scotford, a former magician and sleight-of-hand expert, was present.

Almost from the beginning, skeptics cast doubt on the finds, among them University of Michigan Latin Professor Francis Kelsey who in 1892 called them forgeries. He noted the inscriptions on some of the relics appeared to be a "horrible mixture" of ancient alphabets, such as hieroglyphics and cuneiform, and spelled nothing.

The clay tablets appeared to have been molded on a machine-sawed board, Kelsey said.

But the relics had their vocal promoters, chief among them Daniel Soper, a former Michigan Secretary of State, forced to resign because of corruption. In the early 1900s, Soper teamed with Scotford to sell the objects. They enlisted the support of the Rev. James Savage, priest at Most Holy Trinity Catholic Church in Detroit.

Historians and archaeologists today believe Savage, who became the most avid collector, was not privy to the scam, but was duped to give the finds credibility. Savage believed the artifacts were left by the Lost Ten Tribes of Israel or a colony of ancient Jews. He became an easy mark for Soper and Scotford, Halsey said, because the artifacts confirmed his religious beliefs.

"They were very clever in who they picked as their marks," Halsey said.

Typically, Scotford and Soper would invite prominent members of a community -- a postmaster, a wealthy farmer, a sheriff -- to accompany them on their digs. Scotford would point out a likely place to dig, and, when an object was found, which it inevitably was, he would invite his guest to remove it from the ground. Those accompanying Scotford and Soper were asked to sign affidavits, attesting the items were authentic, because they saw them removed from the ground.

The finds soon drew worldwide attention from those who believed and those who didn't. Publications from The New York Times to The Nation reported on the controversy surrounding the finds.

Soper and Scotford were incensed when anyone questioned the objects' authenticity, and tried to discredit their critics.

When some experts said the unfired clay objects would quickly dissolve in Michigan's damp soil, the pair uncovered fired clay objects. When some said the slate tablets showed the marks of modern saws, chisels and files, Scotford and Soper unearthed crude saws, chisels and files fashioned from copper. When some questioned what happened to the makers of the relics, a tablet surfaced depicting a battle with Indians.

Over time, the story behind the finds changed. Some said the relics were the work of Egyptian Coptics. Some speculated they were the charms of wandering Japanese Buddhist monks.

Notably, wherever Scotford went, more artifacts were found. When he moved to Detroit, pieces were unearthed in Southeast Michigan. Eventually, relics were found in 16 Michigan counties, all baring the IH/ imprint.

Halsey and other modern archaeologists believe Scotford and his sons were making the relics, and Soper was marketing them. Some neighbors complained the pounding coming from Scotford's shop kept them awake at night. In 1911, Scotford's stepdaughter signed an affidavit saying she saw her stepfather making the relics, but she insisted the statement remain secret until after her mother's death.

Despite all evidence to the contrary, some still believe the relics prove foreigners settled here centuries before Columbus sailed.

"To call them an outright fraud is a big mistake by the archaeological professionals," said Wayne May, a self-described "armchair archaeologist" and publisher of the Ancient American, a Wisconsin-based magazine dedicated to the proposition that overseas visitors arrived here long before Columbus.

May conceded some of the Michigan Relics may be fake, but "I believe there's a lot of pieces that are not fraudulent," he said, reached while leading a tour of Ohio burial mounds. "Some day something's going to give, and it's going to prove there were (foreign) people here long before Columbus."

Savage died still believing the Michigan Relics were genuine. He bequeathed his large collection to Notre Dame University. In 1960, a pair of Mormon missionaries found the collection there, and Notre Dame gladly donated it to the church.

In 1977, the church asked Richard Stamps, an Oakland University archaeology professor and practicing Mormon, to examine the relics. Stamps concurred with the conclusions of earlier scholars the relics were fakes. The copper relics, he said, were made from ordinary commercial copper stock, not hammered copper ore. The copper had been treated with chemicals to produce the green patina of aged copper, Stamps said.

The slate tablets appeared to have been cut using the English measuring system of inches and feet and were too smooth and uniform to have been fashioned by an ancient civilization, he said. The slate apparently came from quarries on the New York-Vermont border, he said, and may have been scavenged from a Detroit slate yard.

In 1998-99, Stamps again studied the relics in the Mormon collection and again pronounced them fakes in an article published in 2001 in BYU Studies, a Latter-Day Saint journal.

"Poor Father Savage. I feel so sorry for this Catholic father," Stamps said. "I think Scotford was cranking these things out and slipping them into the ground, and I think Savage didn't have a clue. I think he (Scotford) probably had some sleight-of-hand technique."

Last June, Stamps visited the Slate Valley Museum on the New York-Vermont border and asked workers there to examine several of the relics. The workers could identify the specific quarry each piece came from and what it originally was made to be: a window sill, a shingle or other construction pieces. But one trapezoidal tablet still puzzled Stamps. In the next room, he looked at a display of items made from slate, including a laundry tub. On closer examination, he noticed the end pieces of the tub were trapezoids, exactly matching the tablet.

"It was obvious," Stamps said. "That was a buzz for me."

Through Stamps, the Mormon Church decided to donate its collection to the Michigan Historical Museum in Lansing. It arrived there recently, and workers began preparing the Michigan Relics for an exhibit opening Nov. 15 and running through Aug. 15.

"We thought it was such an important collection historically," Halsey said, "and, since Michigan was the setting of all the finds, that this is where it belonged."

He added that "we're fully cognizant that no matter what we do, people are going to believe in them."

It may be significant that no more relics were found after Scotford died in the 1920s. Soper eventually moved to Chattanooga, and both men went to their graves insisting the objects were authentic.

Ironically, they had wanted the aura of legitimacy that a museum exhibit would give their finds -- although not one portraying them as the greatest archaeological con men in American history.

"They'd call us cowards and scoundrels," said Steve Ostrander, preparing the items for display, to which Halsey added: "They'd be after our jobs."

NeilUnreal
November 7th 2003, 02:19 PM
Thanks, I love fringe and cult archaeology, fringe epigraphy, and archaeological hoaxes of every kind.

-Neil

sylas
November 9th 2003, 05:24 AM
11-07-2003 @ 06:19 PM post located here (http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=274874#post274874)
NeilUnreal:

Thanks, I love fringe and cult archaeology, fringe epigraphy, and archaeological hoaxes of every kind.

-Neil

Then you will enjoy this, as well. :hijacked:

Archaeologist exposed as fraud (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/1008051.stm)
and
Archaeological fraud in Japan (http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/s420235.htm)

This concerns a fraud which has rocked Japanese archaeology relating to the Palaeolithic (stone age). Shinichi Fujimura was famous for many finds, over nearly twenty years. All of that is now discredited. He planted the evidence, which had been the foundation for claims of ancient occupation for Japan, including what had been claimed as evidence for some of the world's oldest human dwellings.

Whether Fujimura's motives were linked to a misguided nationalism, I cannot say. But his finds were seized upon by some nationalistic groups as evidence that Japan has a uniquely ancient cultural history. The scandal is not merely in the fraud itself; but in the failure of the community to uncover it much earlier, and in charges that those who questioned these findings were repressed.

The relevance of this example to TheoWeb is indirect, but should be clear with some broad hints. A major difficulty with archaeology in many areas is that the findings are linked to political or other claims relating to the present.

There is another region of world which is of enormous archaeological interest, but where the interest is often linked to strong pressures to establish certain results. This presents real difficulties for a fair examination and evaluation of any finds.

Cheers -- Silas

NeilUnreal
November 9th 2003, 01:27 PM
Thanks, Silas. Yes, I remember when this story broke.

I don't know why hoaxes appeal to me so much. Of course, being an honest guy, I like them best when they aren't done for personal gain and so aren't so much frauds as they are tricks or willingly-overlooked mistakes. It's even better when they are undetected until the original hoaxer has passed away (or makes a death-bed confession).

Lost treasure stories, etc. appeal to me as well.

I guess I view them as a kind of mass entertainment with at least a certain amount of willing participation by the dupes -- in the sense that they go into it thinking the mystery would be really cool if it were true. Kind of like big-time wrestling!

Two of my favorite hoaxes / probable historical mistakes are the Oak Island Treasure and the Beale Cipher.

-Neil

markporter
November 9th 2003, 01:32 PM
TheoWeb

ooh, that's an abbreviation I haven't come across before.

Yog^sothoth
November 19th 2003, 12:04 PM
my favorite archaeology fraud comes from the discovery by leaky of Homo Habilis. One of my professor of archaeology's mentors was in the field at oldevai gorge when leaky reported his findings. This mentor says, and he tells this to all his archaeology professors, that leaky took bones from as many skeletons as he could find and pieced them together to make the skeleton he called homo habilis. Supposedly, Leaky didn't know that this mentor of hers was watching.

It's a lot of fun archaeology hoaxes! There are so many it's sad.....

sylas
November 19th 2003, 11:14 PM
Yesterday @ 04:04 PM post located here (http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=297615#post297615)
Yog^sothoth:

my favorite archaeology fraud comes from the discovery by leaky of Homo Habilis. One of my professor of archaeology's mentors was in the field at oldevai gorge when leaky reported his findings. This mentor says, and he tells this to all his archaeology professors, that leaky took bones from as many skeletons as he could find and pieced them together to make the skeleton he called homo habilis. Supposedly, Leaky didn't know that this mentor of hers was watching.

It's a lot of fun archaeology hoaxes! There are so many it's sad.....

There are indeed a lot of hoaxes; but this is the first time I have heard Homo habilis listed as one of them. I'm skeptical of this account of events, but remain very interested in good faith to have some references relating to this claim.

Homo habilis is a very early species in the Homo genus, and morphologically a clear transitional between Australopithicenes and later Homo species. What this means is that there can be difficulties in deciding whether a particular fossil instance should be allocated to habilis or to an Australopithecine species.

The Leakeys did not, as it turns out, put together a lot of different fossils to make a skeleton. They found a number of fragmentary specimens in the early 1960s, but these remain clearly distguished as different individuals. From the list of specimens (http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/specimen.html#habilis) at talkorigins: OH 7. Lower jaw, cranial fragments, some hand bones.
OH 8. Foot bones.
OH 13. Lower jaw, teeth, fragments of upper jaw and cranium.
OH 16. Teeth, and a badly crushed partial skull.
These finds cannot be, and were not, combined into a single skeleton. They were, however, sufficient in detail to infer a new species, transitional between Australopithecines and Homo erectus.

Even if one disagrees with the identification of a new taxon, it would be unjust to label this a hoax without some indication of a deliberate attempt at fraud. Piltdown was a hoax, for example. I certainly hope you have more foundation than mere disagreement on the identification of legitimate fossil finds to support the very serious charge of hoax!

Since these finds by the Leakeys, there have been many other finds by other paleontologists which are presently identified as Homo habilis, with varying degrees of confidence: OH 24. Fairly complete but crushed cranium. (Found by Peter Nzube, also at Olduvai Gorge).
KNM-ER 1470. The most famous habilis fossil; a skull found by Bernard Ngeneo in Kenya. Also KNM-ER 1481, leg bones found some kilometers away. A different individual, of course, but tentatively the same species.
OH 62. Skull, teeth, arm and leg bones, found by Tim White in 1986.
OH 65. A complete upper jaw and and parts of the lower face, found in 1995.
KNM-ER 1805, KNM-ER 1813, Stw 53. Other finds, with some dispute on identification; whether they should be allocated to habilis, or to a species of Australopithicene, or other species.Cheers -- silas

Yog^sothoth
November 22nd 2003, 03:45 AM
I only know what my professor, who shall remain nameless as well as her mentor, spoke in class. I have very little interest in physical anthropology so i have no pursued this any further. I will say that this same professor has pointed out that the homo habilis remains seem to be smaller, or female remains of an australpithocene.

If you're wondering. my interest lies in culture anthropology exclusively.

sylas
November 25th 2003, 10:52 PM
11-22-2003 @ 07:45 AM post located here (http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=307871#post307871)
Yog^sothoth:

I only know what my professor, who shall remain nameless as well as her mentor, spoke in class. I have very little interest in physical anthropology so i have no pursued this any further. I will say that this same professor has pointed out that the homo habilis remains seem to be smaller, or female remains of an australpithocene.

If you're wondering. my interest lies in culture anthropology exclusively.

OK. You may be interested that Homo habilis means handy man, because the fossils were found in an area with many instances of the oldest known tool culture; the Oldowan culture (http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo/homo_3.htm). However, discussion of this kind of cultural development is very difficult when so much of basic physical anthropology is not accepted. We are getting off topic, so I'll not expand on the matter here. I may take it up in another thread.

For now, I'll just note for the record that the charge of fraud in this instance has not been not justified. If you are don't want to name people making such serious charges or present the background details, it would (I try to suggest gently) be much better to refrain also the charge itself. The notion of a mentor for the Leakeys is actually very funny, as is the idea of picking up bones from many skeletons.

Cheers -- Silas

Yog^sothoth
November 26th 2003, 12:23 AM
you misunderstand me and I know all about oldowan tools......but that's cool.