OK, new game here!!

[Bill the Cat]

It'll make no sense, but I want everyone to go back and find their first post and paste it in here. Let's see who was talkin about what the first time they registered!!

[Bill the Cat]

Here's my contribution. It was a response to SteveCarr...


Steve, it's called an implied phrase. It's like saying " are we going to stop at this rest stop or the next one. One is implying rest stop. And according to JP the word world (inserted by KJV translators) is, in the Greek, aeon. It's not in the Greek, nor the literal english, but it's implied. Wow you really know how to beat that dead horse.

[markporter]

well, ok.....if you insist.


sorry to disturb the flow of the conversation....but I have a few thoughts on th OP, firstly miller's article at http://www.christian-thinktank.com/gr5part2.html raises some interesting points.....

Secondly, I think there is somewhere in the Bible in which Jesus is talking to the pharisees and says something along the lines of 'if you couldn't see the truth then you wouldn't be judged, it is the fact that you can see it and are rejecting it that's the problem' (of course that could be my imagination, but I don't think it is). I think one clear example of this is satan.....he knows that God is good and he knows the punishment which he has chosen, but he choses to value his own pride above that....I think it is made clear in the Bible where we see the demons asking Jesus if he has come to punish them.

Hell in my opinion is the state of having a broken relationship with God, and thus all the good things which he gives.

Anyway, that's the end of my interlude.....go back to whatever you were discussing now.


(http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=119151#post119151)

[Xavier]

Okay... This is my first post here so bear with me...

I think Science has just proven that God has a sense of humor...

This article is from CNN:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/...reut/index.html

That's right folks... The universe is shaped like a soccer ball... Need any more proof than that????

Xavier

If you care for a link, sry I don't have it handy.... :teeth:

[Xmansmommy]

Ummmmmm, my actual first post has long since gone to the great TWeb post heaven in the sky! :shocked: Er.....uhhhhh.....I think anyway. :doh:

[Xavier]

Have you done a search for it, XMM???

[Em7add11]

Em7: (http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=989#post989)
The sky is blue because of those mind control waves travelling through the sky. It's the same reason that water appears blue. Mind control waves/drugs are blue.

That's the earliest one I could find. My first 3-4k have since been pruned I guess.

[markporter]

http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=3574#post3574 ?

[Xavier]

XMM reveals she does know more than she lets on... :teeth:

[Xmansmommy]

I find it hard to believe that I waited a whole 2 days to say something. I know me. :teeth: But here's what TW says is my first post nonetheless....

I'm an Acts 9 dispensationalist with OV tendencies ;)

Posted here (http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=123&perpage=16&pagenumber=1).

Wow, what a long way I've come since then. :hrm:

:xmm:

[Xmansmommy]

Em7add11:

That's the earliest one I could find. My first 3-4k have since been pruned I guess.

:lmbo:

[Xavier]

Cross-Posting... :doh:

:teeth:

[NSMinistries]

Pruned I tell ya...:nsm:

[Xmansmommy]

And just where is yours :nsm:? :whip:

[NSMinistries]

They cut mine a long long time ago... Guess it wasn't worth keeping... :hrm:

[Xmansmommy]

Awwwww {{{:nsm:}}} Well you can do like I did, and post the first thing they do still have. :teeth:

[bar Jonah]

RightIdea:
Ironic that I am predestined to disbelieve Calvinist predestination. ;)

:thumb:

I haven't changed a bit, have I? :lol:

[Ian Potts]

Well being quite new to TWeb my first post wasn’t that long ago. The VERY first was just in the welcome thread for me:-


Thanks for the welcomes!

Hello Solly - nice to be here.

I look forward to joining in the discussions here.

:smile:

Ian


Does the welcome thread count as a post? If not…
…my first real post was about accents:-


The trouble with accents is that if you move around much, especially in your formative years, your speech can get really messed about.

I have lived in Wales, then Surrey (near London), then Cornwall (far South West of England) and now Devon. My accent has chopped and changed so much I probably sound a little bit like this:

:eww:

[mossrose]

http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=7690&highlight=samesex+marriage

This was my first "intelligent" post. Didn't know it would open such a can of worms......

or did I?

:angeldevil:

[RumTumTugger]

Earliest one I could find was

Iraq

found here (http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?postid=2426#post2426)

I was trying to get my avatar.

[johnnybanano]

Well, here's mine, it was a response to a thread concerning Genesis 18:21 I think.

05-09-2003 @ 08:25 AM post located here (http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=91904#post91904)
johnnybanano:

It is my opinion that God is not necessarily omniscient. God has the full capability of knowing anything. That does not mean that he automatically does. He has countless angel servant/messengers who are capable of looking into any area of God's interest. It is a common theory among Old Testament scholars that most of the occasions when "the LORD said...", it was an angel of the LORD speaking. I believe that the Spirit of God is also capable of scouring the earth or able to "...go down now..." to Sodom that he might see if the Sodomites had done according to its outcry.
The verse states "...its outcry, which has come to Me." This indicates that God had somehow recieved an outcry either from a messenger or from the Sodomites themselves. If the outcry was directly from the Sodomites to God, then most likely the only reason God needed to "...go down..." to Sodom was for verification, much the same way that someone would check for a burn when their child had touched a hot stove. We saw them touch the stove; we know that the stove was hot; yet, we still check their hand to verify that there is a burn. Okay, so it's not the best example.
ANYWAY. Had God received the outcry by message of an angel or the Spirit, which was also probably what would be
"...go[ing] down...", then he would not necessarily be able to automatically know the behavior of the Sodomites.

All righty. Well, I don't know if this has answered your question but I hope it has. If you have any questions feel free to email me or whatever. My address should be on the profile.

[DunnySaze]

Mine was this one, sparring tentatively with socratism over at the Origin of Life thread. Ironically, I have just used several of those same arguments just today. Looks like I'm going full circle.

http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?postid=85413#post85413

[Queen]

Mine is too long and too darn serious.... :tongue:

[luv1another]

Posted: 03-11-2003 at 09:56 PM



I would agree with Jaltus I believe their is two types of tongues,
but I would call them public and private... although there could be possibly 3 types since there is the public type that needs interpretation as well as the one where like in acts everyone knew what was being said, and then private for praying between you and God.
IMHO

in Christs Love
luv1another

ok this is the first one they still have... but my first was to Xmansmommy in the welcome thread :smile:

[Rushing Jaws]

## Mine is on this (http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6453) thread :blush: :ahem: :smile: ##