While the two cases aren't identical, I'm thinking the freedom of expression applies. Robertson was expressing his beliefs about homosexuality based on his understanding, while Sterling was expressing his beliefs about what races his girlfriend should associate with based on HIS understanding. Both, as far as I could see, were entitled to express those views despite my agreement or disagreement with them.
Was it fair to treat Sterling differently than Robertson because of what he said?
Was it fair to treat Sterling differently than Robertson because of what he said?
Comment