PDA

View Full Version : ARTICLE: "The Passion of Christ": What the Movie Could Not Show


STR Ambassador
February 10th 2004, 05:09 PM
Jesus was not a victim. No one took His life from Him. Not Jews. Not Romans. He gave it willingly and purposefully. It was the reason He was born.

The Christ of “The Passion”: What the Movie Couldn’t Show
by Greg Koukl

“The Passion of the Christ” is an historically precise, visually stunning, and viscerally moving portrayal of the crucifixion of Jesus. Yet the most important detail of Jesus’ final hours is not in the film.
What viewers do not see cannot be filmed. While three hours of darkness cloak the cross a transaction takes place that has been planned since the dawn of time.
This transaction entails a crucial fact obscured by the controversy surrounding the film: Jesus was not a victim. No one took His life from Him. Not Jews. Not Romans. He gave it willingly and purposefully. It was His choice, what He wanted. In fact, it was the reason He was born. From the beginning, as predicted in the ancient scrolls, a divine plan had been unfolding.

Though conceived by a miracle, Jesus has humble beginnings. He is born, as the prophet foretold, in Bethlehem, in a manger, among lowly people of modest circumstance. Yet there is a persistent testimony in those early days that He is no ordinary child. The statements of the angel Gabriel, Jesus’ mother Mary, Zacharias the priest, the heavenly host at His birth, Simeon and Anna in the temple, and the magi all center around one message: Jesus is the very Son of God, the promised Messiah of Israel, and the Savior of the world.
After John the Baptist begins preaching in the wilderness, Jesus quietly initiates His ministry, yet His time of obscurity is short. Jesus' popularity accelerates and begins to eclipse that of John, who dutifully steps aside, giving Jesus the spotlight.
Soon it is impossible not to take sides. Unconventional from the outset, Jesus challenges both the practices and the prejudices of a religious establishment He openly confronts. This endears Him to the common people who flock to Him in great numbers. He speaks with authority and vigor, investing old truths with fresh, new insight. He works miracles—healing, casting out demons, even raising the dead.
Jesus quickly becomes a phenomenon, inciting curiosity and interest wherever He goes. His following grows rapidly, but knowing these loyalties run shallow He does not entrust Himself to anyone. It will not be long before the masses become disenchanted. Jesus does not yield to the agenda of any group. Instead, He speaks the truth and lets the chips fall where they may.
The party soon ends. Jesus does not just criticize the leaders; He condemns the people as a whole as wicked and sinful. After miraculously feeding thousands, He laments openly to the masses that they come to Him merely to have their stomachs filled. They do not hunger for the Bread that brings eternal life, Jesus Himself. His listeners respond with shock, disappointment, and derision. It becomes clear that following Jesus brings hardship and difficulty, not glory, power, and prosperity. The people turn away from Jesus en masse and most of His disciples depart. Though the twelve remain, one, Jesus notes, “is a devil,” portentous of a time of growing opposition that now awaits Him.
As the group of Jesus' followers dwindles, He withdraws, spending more time in obscure areas and gentile regions while He invests Himself in training the twelve. Peter's confession that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, is a testimony to the Apostles' deepening commitment to this enigmatic man. Jesus gives them a glimpse of His glory at the Transfiguration and talks plainly of His imminent death, though they do not understand.
Jesus’ conflict with the people, especially the religious leadership, intensifies. He attacks their doctrine, conduct, dress—anything indicative of shallow religious piety that hides the spiritual poverty within each of us. He leaves nothing untouched, rebuking religious self-righteousness more than anything else. He has patience with repentant sinners and those with weak faith, but He has none for religious hypocrisy. Spiritual pride hardens the heart, preventing a humble admission of guilt. It is the most pernicious obstacle to restoring an authentic relationship with the Father. Jesus’ unrelenting assault calcifies His opposition who now actively plot His death.
The circumstances ripen for disaster as Jesus' hour of decision rapidly approaches. Calvary looms before Him; Jerusalem is now Jesus' only objective. He knows what awaits Him. The raising of Lazarus hardens the resolve of His enemies. The Triumphal Entry creates a surge of attention, but the celebration rings hollow. In a matter of days the same people will demand His death, trading “Hosanna” for “Crucify Him.” In spite of the imminent danger to His life, Jesus stands boldly against religious hypocrisy and its root cause, unbelief.
Passion week is not only the end of Jesus' journey, it is the final resolution of thousands of years of prophecy, promise, and expectation. The die is cast; the final act of the drama is about to be played out. Jesus' life will soon be in the hands of those who hate Him, but it is the Father, not Jesus’ enemies, who is in control.
In a matter of hours the Messiah will be dead, but those hours tick by slowly. Some of the time Jesus spends with the ones He loves the most, those to whom He has given every waking moment for the last three years. He gathers them close to prepare them for the dark days ahead. The rest of His time is spent in agony, humiliation, and suffering.

Crucifixion is a cruel form of execution, generally reserved for slaves and rebels. Death is agonizing and slow, the result of shock, exposure and, eventually, asphyxiation. Hanging from a cross constricts the diaphragm, inhibiting breathing. The only way to get air is to release pressure on the arms by pushing up against the nails that pierce the feet, requiring continual effort that could go on for days. Exhaustion eventually overtakes the victim and he suffocates.
For Jesus, though, the pain of the cross pales in the face of a greater anguish. There is a deeper torment that cannot be seen, one no camera can capture and no words can express, more excruciating than nails pinning Jesus’ body to the timbers, more dreadful than lashes ripping flesh from His frame. It is a dark, terrible, incalculable agony, an infinite misery, as God the Father unleashes his fury upon His sinless Son as if guilty of an immeasurable evil.
Why punish the innocent One? Nailed to the top of the cross is an official notice, a certificate of debt to Caesar, a public display of Jesus’ crime: “The King of the Jews.” The cross is payment for this crime. When punishment is complete, Caesar’s court will cancel the debt with a single Greek word stamped upon the parchment’s face: tetelestai. Finished. Paid in full.
Being king of the Jews is not the crime Jesus pays for, however. Hidden to all but the Father is another certificate nailed to that cross. In the darkness that shrouds Calvary from the sixth to the ninth hour, a divine transaction is taking place; Jesus makes a trade with the Father. The crimes of all of humanity—every murder, every theft, every lustful glance; every hidden act of vice, every modest moment of pride, and every monstrous deed of evil; every crime of every man who ever lived—these Jesus takes upon Himself as if guilty of all.
At the last, it is not the cross that takes Jesus’ life. He does not die of exposure, or loss of blood, or asphyxiation. When the full payment is made, when the last of the debt melts away and the justice of God is fully satisfied, Jesus simply dismisses His spirit with a single Greek word that falls from His lips: “Tetelestai.” It is finished. The divine transaction is complete.
You see, there are actually three passions in “The Passion of the Christ.” The passionate intensity of God’s anger at us for our sins collides with the passionate intensity of God’s love for us, causing the passionate intensity of the agony of the cross to be shouldered by God Himself in human form.

The story is told of a king who, having discovered a theft in the royal treasury, decrees that the criminal be publicly flogged for this affront to the crown. When soldiers haul the thief before the king as he sits in his judgment seat, there in chains stands the frail form of the king’s own mother.
Without flinching, he orders the old woman to be bound to the whipping post in front of him. When she is secured, he stands up, lays down his imperial scepter, sets aside his jeweled crown, removes his royal robes, and enfolds the tiny old woman with his own body. Bearing his back to the whip, he orders that the punishment commence. Every blow meant for the criminal lands with full force upon the bare back of the king until the last lash falls.
In like manner, in those dark hours the Father wrapped us in His Son who shields us, taking the justice we deserve. This is not an accident. It was planned. The prophet Isaiah described it 700 years earlier:

Surely our griefs He Himself bore….He was pierced through for our transgressions. He was crushed for our iniquities. The chastening for our well-being fell upon Him, and by His scourging we are healed. All of us like sheep have gone astray. Each of us has turned to his own way. But the Lord has caused the iniquity of us all to fall on Him.

No other man did this. No other man could. Jesus alone, the perfect Son of God, He paid the debt so that whoever trusts in Him will not perish under God’s punishment, but have life with Him fully and forever. Jesus is the Savior of the world. Without Him the world could not be saved from its overwhelming debt.

Permit me to share a final story. Harry Ironside used to tell about a young Russian soldier who, because his father was a friend of Czar Nicholas I, had been made paymaster in one of the barracks.
The young man meant well, but his character was not up to his responsibility. He took to gambling and eventually gambled away a great deal of the government’s money. In due course the young man received notice that a representative of the czar was coming to check accounts, and he knew he was in trouble.
That evening he got out the books and totaled up the funds he owed. Then he went to the safe and got out his own pitifully small amount of money. As he sat and looked at the two he was overwhelmed at the astronomical debt versus his meager funds. He was ruined.
The young soldier determined to take his life. He pulled out his revolver, placed it on the table before him, and wrote a summation of his misdeeds. At the bottom of the ledger where he had totaled up his illegal borrowings, he wrote: “A great debt! Who can pay?” He decided that at the stroke of midnight he would die.
As the evening wore on the soldier grew drowsy and eventually fell asleep. That night Czar Nicholas, as was sometimes his custom, made the rounds of the barracks. Seeing a light, he stopped, looked in, and saw the young man asleep. He recognized him immediately and, looking over his shoulder, saw the ledger and realized all that had taken place.
He was about to awaken him and put him under arrest when his eye fastened on the young man’s message: A great debt! Who can pay? Suddenly, with a surge of magnanimity, he reached over, wrote one word at the bottom of the ledger, and slipped out.
When the young man awoke, he glanced at the clock and saw that it was long after midnight. He reached for his revolver to end his life. But his eye fell upon the ledger and he saw something he had not seen before. There beneath his writing, “A great debt! Who can pay?” was written a single word: “Nicholas.”
He was dumbfounded. It was the Czar’s signature. He said to himself, “The czar must have come by when I was asleep. He has seen the book. He knows all. Still he is willing to forgive.”
The young soldier then trusted the word of the czar. The next morning a messenger came from the palace with exactly the amount needed to meet the deficit. Only the czar could pay, and the czar did pay.
We compare God’s righteousness to our own tawdry performance and we ask: “A great debt to God! Who can pay?” But then the Lord Jesus Christ steps forward and signs His name to our ledger: “Jesus Christ.”
Only Jesus can pay, and He does. He has completed the transaction. He has canceled the debt. It is finished. It only remains for us to trust in His promise.
That is something “The Passion of the Christ” does not reveal. It is something no movie could ever show.


Stand to Reason - www.str.org

RumTumTugger
February 10th 2004, 07:48 PM
Food for thought while watching The Passion. I shall keep this in mind. thank you for posting this.

Mr. Mulatto
February 16th 2004, 04:26 PM
Did you already see "The Passion of Christ" Mr. Koukl?

John Reece
February 17th 2004, 08:24 AM
Mel did good on Primetime last night.

:thumb:

Amazing Rando
February 19th 2004, 12:18 AM
Mel did good on Primetime last night.

:thumb:

He sure did! And hey- this is a fantastic article! Thanks!

EZ to Confuze
February 19th 2004, 12:34 AM
The article is great, and I realize that Gibson couldn't show the forgiving of debts through the movie, but I believe that was never his job. his job was to make a movie that moved people to have to take a position on Christ's death and to do something with that. As Christians it is our job to fill in the gaps to non-Christians who see the movie. It is imperitive that they find out about what Jesus did for them and Christians need to tell them.

Mr. Mulatto
February 26th 2004, 02:59 AM
exactly! So many guests on talk shows talk about how Gibson didn't give enough historical context to the film, and never efficiently explained why Jesus died. I don't believe he wanted to go there. That would be a 5 hour movie or longer. You'd have to start with the Old testament and move your way up until John, that would be movie longer than 5 hours! Like others here have said, Gibson wanted to just paint a picture of the agony Jesus chose to go through for some reason. It's our job to explain that reason.

Oh yes, Mr. Koukl did an awesome job with the article. It was easy to read, and had a more story-telling format to it than other articles. If I had his writing ability, I'd be "money" (good to go).

rmwilliamsjr
March 3rd 2004, 04:50 PM
Gibson with his very RC idea of suffering, desires for us to recapitulate and relive Jesus' pain and suffering, in order that we understand what he went through or is it more? It is not Jesus' suffering that saves us, it is first His active obedience throughout His life and second the bearing on the cross the sins of the people and having God the Father turn from Him in disgust and hatred for the sins upon Him. As this thread's essay points out, these 3 hours are invisible in the movie and not depictable.

Being king of the Jews is not the crime Jesus pays for, however. Hidden to all but the Father is another certificate nailed to that cross. In the darkness that shrouds Calvary from the sixth to the ninth hour, a divine transaction is taking place; Jesus makes a trade with the Father. The crimes of all of humanity—every murder, every theft, every lustful glance; every hidden act of vice, every modest moment of pride, and every monstrous deed of evil; every crime of every man who ever lived—these Jesus takes upon Himself as if guilty of all.

and it is at this crucial point that the movie betrays its RC theology. It desires that we identify with and feel Jesus' pain. It is setting up the typical exchange relationship that underlies RC theology. We make a deal with God, whether the deal is ascetism or monasticism, walking the stations of the Cross, or saying 12 Hail Mary's, or bigger issues like purgatory. They all seem to involve trying to strike a deal with God, somehow to pay for the unpayable, to make a deal and participant in our salvation.
By imagining the suffering, by putting ourselves in his place, we pay part of the penalty that is due sin. But the problem is that it is not the suffering that pays the penalty for sin. It is the death of Jesus, the utter turning away from the person of Christ, the breaking of this incredible bond of love that existed from before the foundation of the world. This love within the Trinity that motivated God to create and to redeem this world. The penalty for sin is the death and utter separation of the sinner from God. Not lashing, not torture, not the spilling of innocent blood. These are images, like the Pascal lamb, the scapegoat, things to direct our attention to the big issue.

And by concentrating on the horrific, on the violence, Gibson shows his RC theology that God demands suffering as a result of sin, this bargin that we attempt to strike with God that somehows pays the price of sin. By being in pain, by being tormented human beings thing that they can pay the price, even the score, contra-act the sin. This is what underlies RC oral confession and the following penitence. An exchange relationship.

Rather Jesus by living a sinless life as a man fullfilled the covenant of works that God made with Adam and renewed with Moses. His active obedience saved him, this made him the proper sacrificial lamb, the one without blemish or spot, that could bear the sins of God's people. And it is on the cross that this was accomplished, not with roman lashes, not with a bloody sacrifice, this are incidental, this are fullfillment of OT prophesies. But they are not the point, they are at most fingers pointing at the moon, not the moon. Jesus carried the sins of His people on his shoulders while on the cross, and the penalty was death and separation from God, something that Jesus in his god-nature had never experienced. Just as the temple curtain was torn, so too was the trinity torn. where justice was fullfilled and love bore the burden.

mrsnacks
March 3rd 2004, 09:24 PM
Greg writes that Jesus was not a victim. He gave His life and the Jews And The Romans didn't take His life. Why couldn't both be true ? They did crucify Him , and He gave His life also . Am I missing something here ? In Greg's statement it comes across that no one is to be held responsible for Jesus' death. The Jews And Romans of that time wouldn't be guilty of crucifying our Savior and they are off the hook .

As one who holds To orthodox preterism - I see the events surounding 70 Ad as a judgement upon Israel for rejecting and crucifying Jesus and not repenting of their unbelief ." Those who reject the Son rejects the Father. "