PDA

View Full Version : I want to do a verbal debate on Daniel 9

dizzle
April 8th 2004, 09:58 PM
I am looking for a mainline futurist of the dispensational (mainstream, not Acts9 or 28) to do a Paltalk debate as my opposition on Daniel 9. Any takers?
Chief of Staff Lizard
April 8th 2004, 10:57 PM
How about a former mainstream futurist. :deal:

:grin:
dizzle
April 8th 2004, 11:04 PM
You want to debate me? I would hate to have to hurt you that badly.
studyhound
April 8th 2004, 11:13 PM
Oh to bad you dont want to debate a Acts 28er - would like to see you go toe to toe with Daywalker on this topic, he has a um . . . . . . inuque view on it. :lolo: (J/K DW (kinda:blush: )


sounds fun :ddw:
dizzle
April 8th 2004, 11:25 PM
Too many other issues come into play with an Acts9 or Acts28er. I want to remain pretty focused and deal with what the a large segment of the Church today believes.
Rubia Warren
April 8th 2004, 11:29 PM
:huh: I don't even think anybody here fits that bill, are there any at TWeb who are not Acts9 or 28 who believe that way?
dizzle
April 8th 2004, 11:40 PM
:huh: I don't even think anybody here fits that bill, are there any at TWeb who are not Acts9 or 28 who believe that way?

Plenty.
Chief of Staff Lizard
April 9th 2004, 09:56 AM
Plenty.
Yeah, but how many are brave enough to take on Dee Dee, queen of TF?


Come on somebody step up to the plate.

:chicken:

:grin:
dizzle
April 9th 2004, 02:17 PM
AJ and I are going to be having a Daniel 9 discussion in the Tennis Court that will be really good, not a debate. That will be a good complement to Studyhound's Revelation thread and the Matthew 24 thread I have.
dizzle
April 10th 2004, 11:03 AM
Come on guys I need a vict... err opponent.

where are all the capable mainline futurists?
dizzle
April 10th 2004, 11:03 AM
more accurately dispies?
Chief of Staff Lizard
April 10th 2004, 11:23 AM
Come on guys I need a vict... err opponent.

where are all the capable mainline futurists?
We've all become preteris. :lmbo:


:grin:
dizzle
April 10th 2004, 11:28 AM
Listen I am nowhere near as deadly in verbal debates as written ones, so there is a good chance I may actually <gasp>lose</gasp> if I have a good opponent. Iwant to strengthen my verbal abilities. Come on, the prospect that I may lose a debate should be motivation enough for you to find me an opponent.

I am also willing to do one on Matthew 24. This would not have to be a dispie opponent, just a mainline futurist.
dizzle
April 10th 2004, 11:29 AM
And I reserve the right to refuse any opponent. I want one that I think is pretty good. NO offense, but SirYapAlot need not apply.
Rubia Warren
April 10th 2004, 01:54 PM
OH! I wish someone would step up to the plate! I would love to be there for this! I was taught in this way about Daniel 9 and believed it for quite a while. I'd love to see the two views go head to head.
Ted
April 10th 2004, 05:24 PM
DeeDee,

Before you do the debate, be sure to read Chapter 3 of I Want to be Left Behind.

Ted
dizzle
April 14th 2004, 09:12 AM
I have read it, thank you. I am going to be taking some notes from it.
Agent Yoshi
April 15th 2004, 02:32 AM
You want to debate me? I would hate to have to hurt you that badly.

ROFL LMBO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Agent Yoshi
April 15th 2004, 02:35 AM
I am looking for a mainline futurist of the dispensational (mainstream, not Acts9 or 28) to do a Paltalk debate as my opposition on Daniel 9. Any takers?

If I had the time, I'd take you up on my views of Daniel 9, but I need to majorly start finishing the Redesign of my site (http://tests2.ancient-paths.net/) (yeah, i know it's not much yet) and finish updating 2 of my articles.
Lion
August 24th 2004, 04:26 PM
Dee Dee, I have known Ted since he was born so am reasonably sure I don't fit the bill,since I'm not a dispie. I admire your efforts. Are all the dispensationalists dead or converted? I'd like to see a good debate on that.
prewrathrap
August 24th 2004, 08:44 PM
Does a progressive dispie count and are you still open for a debate? Plus I am not sure you can take my view of Daniel 9. There is no 70th week of Daniel. I am still futurist though and as my name implies a PREWRATH position.

Shalom
Mark
dizzle
August 24th 2004, 09:17 PM
It is not that I can't "take it" - it is that I want to debate a majority position/popular position in the church thus my desire for a mainline dispie.
~JM~
January 5th 2007, 10:35 PM
I'd love to see you debate a mid to latter Acts dispensationalist, but you are correct, too many issues to deal with.
dizzle
January 6th 2007, 02:36 AM
Time for an avatar :)

I forgot about this thread. I have wanted to do a verbal debate for quite some time on this or Matthew 24. I have never done a structured verbal debate and want the experience, and am nowhere near as proficient (if I may fool myself to think I am proficient) in verbal as I am in writing.
Barraco
January 8th 2007, 07:39 PM
Does a progressive dispie count and are you still open for a debate? Plus I am not sure you can take my view of Daniel 9. There is no 70th week of Daniel. I am still futurist though and as my name implies a PREWRATH position.

Shalom
Mark

wow...how did all these views come up? I got lost in all the dispensationalism....Its funny that the early Church fathers and even those in the days of Reformation never followed beliefs structured in such a way.