Announcement

Collapse

LDS - Mormonism Guidelines

Theists only.

Look! It's a bird, no it's a plane, no it's a bicycle built for two!

This forum is a debate area to discuss issues pertaining to the LDS - Mormons. This forum is generally for theists only, and is generaly not the area for debate between atheists and theists. Non-theists may not post here without first obtaining permission from the moderator of this forum. Granting of such permission is subject to Moderator discretion - and may be revoked if the Moderator feels that the poster is not keeping with the spirit of the World Religions Department.

Due to the sensitive nature of the LDS Temple Ceremonies to our LDS posters, we do not allow posting exact text of the temple rituals, articles describing older versions of the ceremony, or links that provide the same information. However discussion of generalities of the ceremony are not off limits. If in doubt, PM the area mod or an Admin


Non-theists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 forum without such restrictions.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Mormon "Elders" in Unexpected Discussion.

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Mormon "Elders" in Unexpected Discussion.

    I found this to be pretty good.
    Tags: None
  • #2
    I don't know... he kept complaining that they were dominating the conversation, but he himself was dominating the conversation.
    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

    Comment

    • #3
      Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
      I don't know... he kept complaining that they were dominating the conversation, but he himself was dominating the conversation.
      I think it's more that that's what they were trying to do. To me, it looked like they were going to try and "answer the question he should have asked".

      Comment

      • #4
        Originally posted by Cerebrum123 View Post
        I think it's more that that's what they were trying to do. To me, it looked like they were going to try and "answer the question he should have asked".
        Yeah.
        The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

        Comment

        Previous template Next
        widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
        Working...
        X