PDA

View Full Version : Important! Warning points program


dizzle
June 4th 2004, 01:45 PM
TheologyWeb members:

Soon we are going to be implementing a warning points system to aid us in moderation, and to aid you in knowing where and when you were moderated. We found in the past, and more especially as we grow, that it was difficult to keep track of who was moderated, when, where, and for what, and one moderator may not necessarily know what was going on or said in another area. Our system of all reported posts being viewable by all leadership alleviated that, but no one had time to review, or could be expected to remember, every single report and action. Also sometimes a moderation may happen several pages back in a thread, and if the notice was placed in the offending post itself, the member may not know they were moderated and may inadvertently repeat the offense. This new system will help alleviate all of the above, but of course not being perfect, but certainly an improvement.

For you the member, this is how it will work. It will be encumbent upon you (the decorum will be modified accordingly) to check the status of your account to see if you have been issued any warnings. It may be possible in the future to make it so that a PM or email is automatically sent when this happens, but for right now you can view your warnings in your User Control panel under Warnings or just by going here (http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/warn.php?do=ViewMyWarnings)

Whenever a moderator has to intervene because of you for any reason, a warning/notice will be issued. These warnings will have assigned a point scale. Most warnings/notice (in line with our generally lenient moderation) will have zero points attached, especially for things that are more administrative in nature such as double posting, posting threads in the wrong area, or minor violations (ie those that right now are edited without an official moderator notice).

On the next level, the most common warnings will be attached with the value of one point (or if it is more blatant two points). The types of offenses that will fall in this categories are the ones that generally earn a public moderator’s notice. If the post is really out there in violation in the totality the circumstance, it could earn three points. We anticipate such being rare.

However, if a violation is a repeat, the points will increase. For instance a repeat violation of a one point offense, will result in a two point warning, if it happens again, it will be three points, and again it will be four points.

Now why are these points important? If a member earns 10 points within a six month period, said member will automatically be placed into moderation with the potential for suspension upon admin review. After six months, the record of warnings/notices will remain in place, but the points will drop off of consideration to count towards the total of 10. When a member is placed in moderation, a personal plan of rehabilitation will be discussed with the member for getting things back on track.

There are some things which would be automatic banishment such as posting clear pornography. Other things will be five point offenses such as dropping the F-Bomb or having a post littered with profanity, even if asterisked.

There are also several offenses which are automatic three point offenses such as arguing with a moderator notice in the thread or playing games with our participant privacy/anomymity rule (only because we find that the most inane childishly stupid thing to do).


We are planning on implementing this starting next weekend.

anthrogirl
June 4th 2004, 01:54 PM
There are also several offenses which are automatic three point offenses such as arguing with a moderator notice in the thread or playing games with our participant privacy/anomymity rule (only because we find that the most inane childishly stupid thing to do).

We are planning on implementing this starting next weekend.
sounds good. what is the participant privacy/anonymity rule? how does one play games with it? if i need to ask, do i need to know :smile: ?

thanks,
anthrogirl

dizzle
June 4th 2004, 01:57 PM
Here is the rule

In conjunction with our Privacy Statement please respect the anonymity of other posters on TheologyWeb. Any member may choose to keep their personal information such as name and location from being published on this forum even if such information is common knowledge elsewhere. Additional personal information such as occupation, training, background, etc. may be removed if: it is not easily obtainable public information elsewhere; can only be referenced by blatantly violating a request for the privacy of a member’s name; or is just generally disruptive to the forum. Once a member invokes this privilege, his reasons for doing so are just as private as the information itself. This section, like the Privacy Statement can be over-ruled in cases of need to protect to protect TheologyWeb or its other members from intentional or unintentional interference, harm, or deception.

One plays games with it by trying to thinly disguise references to personal information that they are aware another member wishes not to be a part of this forum.

So that this thread does not get side-tracked by this topic - I do ask that any further questions on the anonymity rule or how one plays games with it to be directed to me in private (your question was fine Anthro - you had no idea because we have never had an ounce of problems ever with you)

Seasanctuary
June 4th 2004, 09:31 PM
Do warning points count toward me getting a custom pet?

spl_cadet
June 4th 2004, 09:47 PM
How about good points as well?

dizzle
June 4th 2004, 10:37 PM
that is what pearls and rep are for.

speaking of pearls, you are a pearl hog, get rid of some of those!

Tickle Me Goody
June 4th 2004, 10:50 PM
that is what pearls and rep are for.
rep? What rep? Do you mean those itsy-bitsy, teeny-weeny little bars that we appleless Twebbers used to have?

speaking of pearls, you are a pearl hog, get rid of some of those!
Never cast pearls before hogs. (Catch that theological stement, Dee Dee?)

gg

Sheepdog
June 5th 2004, 01:23 AM
brilliant idea! whoever thought of this has rep points coming a soon as WUC unviels the new rep system.

dizzle
June 5th 2004, 08:02 AM
brilliant idea! whoever thought of this has rep points coming a soon as WUC unviels the new rep system.

WUC has been burning the candle at three ends and working on numerous projects at once. It will be worth it though.

$cirisme
June 5th 2004, 10:15 AM
WUC has been burning the candle at three ends and working on numerous projects at once. It will be worth it though.
It includes a Bayesian filter that automatically neg reps people who say "wuc" or any variation.

:wink:

jason
June 6th 2004, 12:47 AM
Perhaps with the new system people who are in moderation for repeated bad behavior could get a little training wheels icon on their posts.

Jason

dizzle
June 10th 2004, 06:57 AM
This starts this weekend guys!