Answers in Genesis and Reasons to Believe: new books against each other's positions

[Socrates]

AiG has released Refuting Compromise -- see introductory chapter (http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/rc/intro.asp).

RtB has produced A Matter of Days, and the introductory chapter is also online. But now the RTB demands registration before accessing its articles, so you'll have to make do with AiG's point-by-point rebuttal (http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2004/0601critique.asp).

[apostate]

I think the most amusing part of the whole creationism debate is to watch creationists sling mud at each other.

Please read the forum guidelines before posting. Thank you.

[Abigail]

Are you even supposed to be posting in cosmogony?

[apostate]

who knows?

[Abigail]

Try reading the guidelines and then you'll know :ahem:

[apostate]

but where's the fun in that?

[Abigail]

but where's the fun in that?
:haha:(apostate)

[A Beautiful Truth]

But now the RTB demands registration before accessing its articles, so you'll have to make do with AiG's point-by-point rebuttal (http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2004/0601critique.asp).

Why would having to register stop one from getting both sides of the story?

With AiG, only one side is presented. But that is the way AiG likes to work, right?

[dizzle]

Charleen, that dig was unnecessary.

Anyways though

But now the RTB demands registration before accessing its articles,

Then register. Or maybe Charleen can get permission from RTB for us to reproduce the chapter here so that our members can see it without registering. We could maybe have a thread in which special permission is given to post both items in thier entirely here.

That would be nice.

[A Beautiful Truth]

See if this works

http://www.reasons.org/resources/products/a_matter_of_days/index.shtml?main

I am leaving on a trip and can try to contact RTB about it when I get back.

Thanks

Charleen

[Socrates]

Why would having to register stop one from getting both sides of the story?

With AiG, only one side is presented. But that is the way AiG likes to work, right?
Nope, you got both sides of the story -- AiG's response incorporates RTB's book intro. RTB is the only one with only one side presented. Charleen's lovely double standards are at work again :bonk:

[learning]

Here's a link to the homeschool sonlight's list of books, which have the two sides of the story of YEC, OEC, you can read the blurb about the books to see which is which.
I should say one book doesn't have the two sides, but they list books with different sides.
www.sonlight.com/books-cstudies-evolution.html

[Tickle Me Goody]

Here's a link to the homeschool sonlight's list of books, which have the two sides of the story of YEC, OEC, you can read the blurb about the books to see which is which.
I should say one book doesn't have the two sides, but they list books with different sides.
www.sonlight.com/books-cstudies-evolution.html (http://www.sonlight.com/books-cstudies-evolution.html)
Well I really caught it for listing some sites on another thread but it looks like it may be O.K. here (given that learning did it). For seeing all sides of a scientific issue, I would suggest:
http://www.asa3.org/


gg

[A Beautiful Truth]

Nope, you got both sides of the story -- AiG's response incorporates RTB's book intro. RTB is the only one with only one side presented. Charleen's lovely double standards are at work again :bonk:

I am beginning to wonder if even responding to you somehow looks bad upon my intelligence.

So AiG's response incorporates RTB's book intro. Is that sort of like the YEC book Creation and Time (written purposefuly with the exact title of Dr. Ross's book)incorporating parts of Dr. Ross's Creation and Time to give an unbiased review?

[Socrates]

I am beginning to wonder if even responding to you somehow looks bad upon my intelligence.
:haha: What intelligence: :huh:

So AiG's response incorporates RTB's book intro. Is that sort of like the YEC book Creation and Time (written purposefuly with the exact title of Dr. Ross's book)incorporating parts of Dr. Ross's Creation and Time to give an unbiased review?
:cry: Stop whinging. :rant: When was the last time RTB gave AiG's viewpoint an unbiased review.

[Socrates]

Here's a link to the homeschool sonlight's list of books, which have the two sides of the story of YEC, OEC, you can read the blurb about the books to see which is which.
I should say one book doesn't have the two sides, but they list books with different sides.
www.sonlight.com/books-cstudies-evolution.html
It would be a good "learning" tool to study AiG's very detailed response to Sonlight's pro-old-earth view at www.answersingenesis.org/docs2004/0322holzmann.asp

[Socrates]

Then register.
Why should I? I'm delighted that RTB has made it harder for people to extract the misleading compromise from the site :bonk:

In any case, the AiG response has clearly differentiated RTB's book from their comments.

[A Beautiful Truth]

:haha: What intelligence: :huh:


:cry: Stop whinging. :rant: When was the last time RTB gave AiG's viewpoint an unbiased review.

Thing is, you presented AiG's presentation as if it were unbiased. My point remaims.

You are officially back on my ignore list for another week because of your continued insults. I choose not to discuss in such an immature manner.

~Charleen

[Socrates]

Thing is, you presented AiG's presentation as if it were unbiased.
Not possible. AiG and I explicitly deny that there is such a thing as an unbiased presentation.

[Sinai]

AiG has released Refuting Compromise -- see introductory chapter (http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/rc/intro.asp).

RtB has produced A Matter of Days, and the introductory chapter is also online. But now the RTB demands registration before accessing its articles, so you'll have to make do with AiG's point-by-point rebuttal (http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2004/0601critique.asp).

Thanks for posting this information.

[Sinai]

Not possible. AiG and I explicitly deny that there is such a thing as an unbiased presentation.
Very good point, Doc. AiG, RTB, TO and other similar websites all tend to present data and discussion from each site's own particular bias.