I believe it may be possible to derive a rigorous reason for the Divine from metalogics.
Well, metalogic is really simple. Did you know that metalogic is merely the generalizing of logical connectives??? In other words, saying anything about a logical connective IS called metalogic!!! You will notice I say many things about these connectives. Well, all that logic is, is the generalizing of what can be said through the use of logical connectives.
Parmenides said "nothing IS not" which means "nothing doesn't IS" or "IS" doesn't apply to nothing.
It is a scientific fact that nothing does not exist somewhere. And even if one had a superconducting and supermagnetic box (which could remove magnetic and electric fields) that one could remove all of the gases, photons and charged particles from; you would still have the gravitational field in the box (which is a longitudinal radiation gradient)! m = ∇ x Φ (-∇A)/(n0 ς) therefore G ∝ ∇ς where ς is webers per cubic meter or the longitudinal radiation intensity.
This link discusses the history of the idea; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum#...interpretation
Four senses of “IS” can be meant;
generalization; identity (equivalents), [mankind IS homosapien]
implication (implies) [a man IS an animal]
predication (has the property of) [an orange IS the color orange]
existence; instantiation (exists as) [there IS truth]
Generalization has two antecedents;
Liken
Contrast
Which means;
Nothing likens not
Nothing contrasts not
Nothing generalizes not
Nothing implicates not
Nothing describes not
Nothing instantiates not
The contraposition of "nothing IS not" is "everything IS" or "everything does IS" or "IS" applies to everything.
meaning;
everything likens
everything contrasts
everything generalizes
everything implicates
everything describes
everything instantiates
The contraposition of "everything IS" is "one thing self-IS"
Or by implication; IF everything IS (or likens, contrasts, generalizes, implicates, describes, and instantiates) then everything generalizes one thing. But this one thing, is also a thing, in other words it self-IS;
meaning;
one thing self-likens => it self-harmonizes => it is autoimmune
one thing self-contrasts => it self-informs => it is an autodidact
one thing self-generalizes => it self-identifies => it is self-aware => it is sapient
one thing self-implicates => it is self-causal => it is self-deterministic (conscious) => it is self-reasoning
one thing self-describes => it is self-interested
one thing self-instantiates => it is self-generating => it is self-sustaining => it is self-sufficient
The contraposition of "one thing self-IS" is "one thing all-IS"
meaning;
one thing all-likens => it all-unifies => it is omnibenevolent
one thing all-contrasts => it all-informs (and from self-aware it all-teaches)
one thing all-generalizes => it all-identifies => it is all-aware => omniscient
one thing all-implicates => it is all-causal => it is all-deterministic (and from conscious => all-intentional (and from self-reasoning => all-reasoning => all-wise)
one thing all-describes => it is all-essence => monopantheistic
one thing all-instantiates => omnipotent and eternal.
here is some of the reasoning more explicitly;
Relevant implication suggests causation and is correlation. When it is impossible for there to be missing variables correlation necessarily is causation. Since all things are implicated here it is impossible for there to be missing variables. Thus this one thing is self-causal or all-causal
Note; "causal" is not in the same declension as "caused"; the latter refers to an event in time, the former refers to a process through time. Self-causal means self-deterministic or teleological. Self-determinism is consciousness. Thus cause is reason and causal is reasoning. Therefore; one thing is self-reasoning or all-reasoning
If this one thing is all-describing, all things must be made of it and get their essence from it. Which means the one thing is a monistic pantheism.
We have established that the one thing is an autoimmune, autodidact, sapient, consciousness, that is self-interested, self-sufficient, and omnibenevolent, making it an all-teacher, that is omniscient, and all-wise, as well as monopantheistic, omnipotent and eternal.
This essay about the one thing is part of it's self-describing, self-reasoning, and as an act of it being an all-teacher.
Well, metalogic is really simple. Did you know that metalogic is merely the generalizing of logical connectives??? In other words, saying anything about a logical connective IS called metalogic!!! You will notice I say many things about these connectives. Well, all that logic is, is the generalizing of what can be said through the use of logical connectives.
Parmenides said "nothing IS not" which means "nothing doesn't IS" or "IS" doesn't apply to nothing.
It is a scientific fact that nothing does not exist somewhere. And even if one had a superconducting and supermagnetic box (which could remove magnetic and electric fields) that one could remove all of the gases, photons and charged particles from; you would still have the gravitational field in the box (which is a longitudinal radiation gradient)! m = ∇ x Φ (-∇A)/(n0 ς) therefore G ∝ ∇ς where ς is webers per cubic meter or the longitudinal radiation intensity.
This link discusses the history of the idea; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum#...interpretation
Four senses of “IS” can be meant;
generalization; identity (equivalents), [mankind IS homosapien]
implication (implies) [a man IS an animal]
predication (has the property of) [an orange IS the color orange]
existence; instantiation (exists as) [there IS truth]
Generalization has two antecedents;
Liken
Contrast
Which means;
Nothing likens not
Nothing contrasts not
Nothing generalizes not
Nothing implicates not
Nothing describes not
Nothing instantiates not
The contraposition of "nothing IS not" is "everything IS" or "everything does IS" or "IS" applies to everything.
meaning;
everything likens
everything contrasts
everything generalizes
everything implicates
everything describes
everything instantiates
The contraposition of "everything IS" is "one thing self-IS"
Or by implication; IF everything IS (or likens, contrasts, generalizes, implicates, describes, and instantiates) then everything generalizes one thing. But this one thing, is also a thing, in other words it self-IS;
meaning;
one thing self-likens => it self-harmonizes => it is autoimmune
one thing self-contrasts => it self-informs => it is an autodidact
one thing self-generalizes => it self-identifies => it is self-aware => it is sapient
one thing self-implicates => it is self-causal => it is self-deterministic (conscious) => it is self-reasoning
one thing self-describes => it is self-interested
one thing self-instantiates => it is self-generating => it is self-sustaining => it is self-sufficient
The contraposition of "one thing self-IS" is "one thing all-IS"
meaning;
one thing all-likens => it all-unifies => it is omnibenevolent
one thing all-contrasts => it all-informs (and from self-aware it all-teaches)
one thing all-generalizes => it all-identifies => it is all-aware => omniscient
one thing all-implicates => it is all-causal => it is all-deterministic (and from conscious => all-intentional (and from self-reasoning => all-reasoning => all-wise)
one thing all-describes => it is all-essence => monopantheistic
one thing all-instantiates => omnipotent and eternal.
here is some of the reasoning more explicitly;
Relevant implication suggests causation and is correlation. When it is impossible for there to be missing variables correlation necessarily is causation. Since all things are implicated here it is impossible for there to be missing variables. Thus this one thing is self-causal or all-causal
Note; "causal" is not in the same declension as "caused"; the latter refers to an event in time, the former refers to a process through time. Self-causal means self-deterministic or teleological. Self-determinism is consciousness. Thus cause is reason and causal is reasoning. Therefore; one thing is self-reasoning or all-reasoning
If this one thing is all-describing, all things must be made of it and get their essence from it. Which means the one thing is a monistic pantheism.
We have established that the one thing is an autoimmune, autodidact, sapient, consciousness, that is self-interested, self-sufficient, and omnibenevolent, making it an all-teacher, that is omniscient, and all-wise, as well as monopantheistic, omnipotent and eternal.
This essay about the one thing is part of it's self-describing, self-reasoning, and as an act of it being an all-teacher.
Comment