OOPS, Did I bust Kent Hovind?

[Butters]

I just recieced this E-mail from the Smithsonian Institute,


Your correspondence of 30 March 2003 regarding Kent Hovind has just
been
received in this office. We have forwarded your request to the
Institution's Department of Anthropology at the National Museum of
Natural History, from which a response will be forwarded if helpful
information is available.

Thank you for your interest in the Smithsonian Institution.


>>> I saw this and wondered if you have publicly
challenged this man, and demanded a retraction. This
is a very serious charge, and it seems to me that he
should have to answer for it.

The Smithsonian Institute [sic] has 33,000 sets of
human remains in their basement right now as you are
reading this. Many of them were taken while the
people were still alive. They were so desperate to
find missing links, so desperate to prove their theory
that they murdered people to prove it.
Source: Unmasking the False Religion of Evolution
Chapter 4 - a transcript of Kent Hovind's early
sermons circa 1996. Still available at
http://home1.gte.net/dmadh/hovind4.htm

Thank you

I doubt anything will ever come of it, I'm sure they were aware of this, but, who knows?

[Bald Ape]

I'm sure they'll respond - just as soon as they've found a new place to hide all the bodies...

[Dr.GH]

Well. I find that "Dr. Dino's" legal problems are rather more complex than I had thought.

http://www.bestmessageboard.com/DispThreads.php

[Socrates]

Who gives a monkey's about Hovind? It's only dishonest evolutionists and Rossites resorting to "guilt-by-association" ploys who pretend that he's typical of creationists. See Aig's critique www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/1011hovind.asp

[tgamble]

Today @ 06:23 AM post located here (http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=75238#post75238)
Socrates:

Who gives a monkey's about Hovind?

Ignoring your typical nastiness and insults, there are plenty of people who gives a "monkey's about hovind."
http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?postid=75271#post75271

Despite your dishonest claims to the contrary, evolutionists do not claim that Hovind is typical of creationists. I've often pointed out to Hovind defenders that he's a quack even by creationist standards.

btw, who gives a monkey's what AIG thinks about Hovind? Certainly not Hovind's followers.

[Socratism]

The issue is not whether there are creationists who make up extra-biblical explanations that are not necessarily true, but rather whether the teaching of scripture that God created the universe and Earth only a few thousand years ago is true.

If creationists are wrong about the extra-biblical details they hypothesize so what? This only puts their stories into the same erroneous category as the ones which claim that the universe and Earth are billions of years old and that life was a natural consequence of chemicals plus billions of years.

[tgamble]

04-23-2003 @ 06:28 PM post located here (http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=76747#post76747)
Socratism:

The issue is not whether there are creationists who make up extra-biblical explanations that are not necessarily true, but rather whether the teaching of scripture that God created the universe and Earth only a few thousand years ago is true.

And, of course, it's not true!


If creationists are wrong about the extra-biblical details they hypothesize so what? This only puts their stories into the same erroneous category as the ones which claim that the universe and Earth are billions of years old and that life was a natural consequence of chemicals plus billions of years.

You've yet to present any evidence that the earth is NOT billions of years or that evolution isn't true.

[GrayPilgrim]

04-21-2003 @ 10:16 PM post located here (http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=75160#post75160)
Dr.GH:

Well. I find that "Dr. Dino's" legal problems are rather more complex than I had thought.

http://www.bestmessageboard.com/DispThreads.php

Your link does not work.