.
"Evolutionists do not understand OOL" is a headline statement not from me (although I have often said the same), it is a statement from Dr. James Tour - recognized as one of the 50 most influential scientists in the world today and author of over 500 research papers in the last 30 years.
In this article: http://christiannews.net/2014/10/13/...rigin-of-life/ Tour says several things that caught my eye. Here they are with a brief comment from me:
"Let me tell you what goes on in the back rooms of science-with National Academy members, with Nobel Prize winners," Tour stated. "I have sat with them, and when I get them alone, not in public-because it's a scary thing, if you say what I just said-I say, 'Do you understand all of this, where all of this came from, and how this happens?'"
The answer he inevitably receives, Tour explained, is: "no."
"Every time that I have sat with people who are synthetic chemists, who understand this, they go, 'Uh-uh. Nope.'" Tour said. "And if they're afraid to say 'yes,' they say nothing. They just stare at me, because they can't sincerely do it."
Those statements from Tour don't surprise me in the least. It agrees with other material that I've posted here on TWeb. There is FEAR within the "scientific" community - FEAR that if they spoke freely about what the evidence and logic indicates they'd be ousted as "pseudoscientists" ... they'd lose their grant money and possibly even their jobs.
At the Cornell Symposium back in 2011 we were at a dinner and one of the prominent participants used that same word - FEAR - to describe why many scientists including himself did not speak out. It's disgusting and shameful! Thank you, Evolutionists!
"From what I can see, microevolution is a fact; we see it all around us regarding small changes within a species, and biologists demonstrate this procedure in their labs on a daily basis. Hence, there is no argument regarding microevolution," he wrote in a blog post. "The core of the debate for me, therefore, is the extrapolation of microevolution to macroevolution."
Here again Tour says something that I have stated often here on TWeb. In my words: there is evolution (observable, testable science) and then there is Evolution (non-observable, non-testable extrapolation based on a BELIEF that something occurred).
Sadly and tragically (certainly where Evolution is concerned), in today's "science" we often find that extrapolation has replaced observation. The rock-solid foundation of true science has been substituted with beliefs based on a religious ideology (Materialism). So say I, Jorge.
"If evolution cannot account for life's existence, then how did life originate? Tour says the most reasonable answer is simple. "I believe fundamentally that God created us all," he told the Houston Chronicle."
As a good, true scientist, Tour simply follows the evidence to its logical conclusion.
Read 'em and weep, children.
Jorge
"Evolutionists do not understand OOL" is a headline statement not from me (although I have often said the same), it is a statement from Dr. James Tour - recognized as one of the 50 most influential scientists in the world today and author of over 500 research papers in the last 30 years.
In this article: http://christiannews.net/2014/10/13/...rigin-of-life/ Tour says several things that caught my eye. Here they are with a brief comment from me:
"Let me tell you what goes on in the back rooms of science-with National Academy members, with Nobel Prize winners," Tour stated. "I have sat with them, and when I get them alone, not in public-because it's a scary thing, if you say what I just said-I say, 'Do you understand all of this, where all of this came from, and how this happens?'"
The answer he inevitably receives, Tour explained, is: "no."
"Every time that I have sat with people who are synthetic chemists, who understand this, they go, 'Uh-uh. Nope.'" Tour said. "And if they're afraid to say 'yes,' they say nothing. They just stare at me, because they can't sincerely do it."
Those statements from Tour don't surprise me in the least. It agrees with other material that I've posted here on TWeb. There is FEAR within the "scientific" community - FEAR that if they spoke freely about what the evidence and logic indicates they'd be ousted as "pseudoscientists" ... they'd lose their grant money and possibly even their jobs.
At the Cornell Symposium back in 2011 we were at a dinner and one of the prominent participants used that same word - FEAR - to describe why many scientists including himself did not speak out. It's disgusting and shameful! Thank you, Evolutionists!
"From what I can see, microevolution is a fact; we see it all around us regarding small changes within a species, and biologists demonstrate this procedure in their labs on a daily basis. Hence, there is no argument regarding microevolution," he wrote in a blog post. "The core of the debate for me, therefore, is the extrapolation of microevolution to macroevolution."
Here again Tour says something that I have stated often here on TWeb. In my words: there is evolution (observable, testable science) and then there is Evolution (non-observable, non-testable extrapolation based on a BELIEF that something occurred).
Sadly and tragically (certainly where Evolution is concerned), in today's "science" we often find that extrapolation has replaced observation. The rock-solid foundation of true science has been substituted with beliefs based on a religious ideology (Materialism). So say I, Jorge.
"If evolution cannot account for life's existence, then how did life originate? Tour says the most reasonable answer is simple. "I believe fundamentally that God created us all," he told the Houston Chronicle."
As a good, true scientist, Tour simply follows the evidence to its logical conclusion.
Read 'em and weep, children.
Jorge
Comment