View Full Version : George Bush Will Set Fire To Your House
NotQiteEinstein
October 20th 2004, 02:39 PM
Shoot your dog, eat your best cold fried chicken, jam your Xerox machine, grope your wife, give nukes to the Crips and the Bloods, raise taxes on the poor to 110%, give Margaret Cho a two hour nightly "comedy" special, replace vegetables with sand on all high school cafeteria menus and require that all women be handcuffed to their basement radiators until they breed the requisite 3 Aryan children this countries needs. If minority women can't churn out the good stuff, they stay handcuffed. And -- oh yeah -- he'll reinstitute the draft.
Why doesn't John Kerry say all of these things instead of merely saying Bush will bring back the draft? I mean whenever he's asked "Why are you saying this when the president has denied it categorically?" He responds, "Well, he also said there were weapons of mass destruction. He has no credibility." Never mind the asinine cynicism involved in that Kerry also said he thought there were WMDs (don't make me go through the list of others who did as well). But if you aren't bound by evidence and the President's denials don't count, why not really cut loose with some scary scenarios. The president will require that all taco meat be replaced with blue cheese. A 500 foot nude statue of Helen Thomas will replace the Washington Monument -- that towering symbol of our phallocracy. Puppies will burn, kittens will fly, diapers will chafe -- all if George W. Bush is elected.
Arnold
October 20th 2004, 02:46 PM
Shoot your dog, eat your best cold fried chicken, jam your Xerox machine, grope your wife, give nukes to the Crips and the Bloods, raise taxes on the poor to 110%, give Margaret Cho a two hour nightly "comedy" special, replace vegetables with sand on all high school cafeteria menus and require that all women be handcuffed to their basement radiators until they breed the requisite 3 Aryan children this countries needs. If minority women can't churn out the good stuff, they stay handcuffed. And -- oh yeah -- he'll reinstitute the draft.
Why doesn't John Kerry say all of these things instead of merely saying Bush will bring back the draft? I mean whenever he's asked "Why are you saying this when the president has denied it categorically?" He responds, "Well, he also said there were weapons of mass destruction. He has no credibility." Never mind the asinine cynicism involved in that Kerry also said he thought there were WMDs (don't make me go through the list of others who did as well). But if you aren't bound by evidence and the President's denials don't count, why not really cut loose with some scary scenarios. The president will require that all taco meat be replaced with blue cheese. A 500 foot nude statue of Helen Thomas will replace the Washington Monument -- that towering symbol of our phallocracy. Puppies will burn, kittens will fly, diapers will chafe -- all if George W. Bush is elected.
:lmbo:
I just heard a Hillary quote: "They're (Republicans) more interested in tax cuts for the rich than for flu shots for the rest of us."
:rofl:
NotQiteEinstein
October 20th 2004, 02:53 PM
I read the fine print of the Bush plan. Did you know he's going to remove that pleasant fresh fragrance from thunderstorms? And the tiny bubbles in champagne are going to be replaced with gigantic, oafish bubbles that have no sense of elegance whatsoever!
Arnold
October 20th 2004, 02:56 PM
Go W! :cheers:
The Laughing Man
October 20th 2004, 03:03 PM
give Margaret Cho a two hour nightly "comedy" special
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGH!!!!!
Benster
October 20th 2004, 03:17 PM
I have heard that the president has pledged not to introduce the draft while he is in office. If this is true, then that is good new for the terrorists. It means that as long as they can prolong the chaos in Iraq, then we can be forced to withdraw. Because, in the case of their being not enough troops to defend the US, operate in other countries, and remain in force in Iraq, we will have to withdraw from Iraq; the draft not being an option (which it always is, BTW).
What if we were attacked by a foreign country?! How about 2,3,4 foreign countries? (The president has said: "Bring 'em on"!) What if we were forced to mobilize 2 or 3 defensive retaliations? What if the country was really at risk of being taken over? Even then?...NO DRAFT!?!? :lol:
Do you understand the principals of mathematics? IF the generals decide there aren't enough troops, then there will be; a) a draft, or b) a withdrawal/surrender. There is NO other option. No leader refuses the military more troops if the stakes are high enough. For you to believe that the president would NEVER institute the draft makes you one of the most gullible people in the country. This is an example of a politically expedient white lie.
"We will most likely not need a draft, so why get everyone worked up about it. Pretend that there is a no-draft policy."
NotQiteEinstein
October 20th 2004, 03:27 PM
This just in:
He will put one of those
white gristly things in every burger
He will make it forever winter and never Christmas
The Laughing Man
October 20th 2004, 03:36 PM
It means that as long as they can prolong the chaos in Iraq, then we can be forced to withdraw.
Riiiiiiight. Well, considering how long it took for them to kill 1000 soldiers, they'll be able to force us to withdraw in about, oh, a hundred years or so.
NotQiteEinstein
October 20th 2004, 03:50 PM
Riiiiiiight. Well, considering how long it took for them to kill 1000 soldiers, they'll be able to force us to withdraw in about, oh, a hundred years or so.
I'm done trying to reason with libs, I just make fun of them.:hehe:
Sheepdog
October 20th 2004, 04:06 PM
I'm done trying to reason with libs, I just make fun of them.:hehe:
:lol:
you are a wiser man than I!
Arnold
October 20th 2004, 04:36 PM
I'm done trying to reason with libs, I just make fun of them.:hehe:
Right on brotha...
Liberals protest global warming: :flaming::flaming::flaming::flaming:
Arnold
October 20th 2004, 04:41 PM
I have heard that the president has pledged not to introduce the draft while he is in office. If this is true, then that is good new for the terrorists. It means that as long as they can prolong the chaos in Iraq, then we can be forced to withdraw. Because, in the case of their being not enough troops to defend the US, operate in other countries, and remain in force in Iraq, we will have to withdraw from Iraq; the draft not being an option (which it always is, BTW).
What if we were attacked by a foreign country?! How about 2,3,4 foreign countries? (The president has said: "Bring 'em on"!) What if we were forced to mobilize 2 or 3 defensive retaliations? What if the country was really at risk of being taken over? Even then?...NO DRAFT!?!? :lol:
Do you understand the principals of mathematics? IF the generals decide there aren't enough troops, then there will be; a) a draft, or b) a withdrawal/surrender. There is NO other option. No leader refuses the military more troops if the stakes are high enough. For you to believe that the president would NEVER institute the draft makes you one of the most gullible people in the country. This is an example of a politically expedient white lie.
"We will most likely not need a draft, so why get everyone worked up about it. Pretend that there is a no-draft policy."
The answer is called a MOAB (but I liked it better when it was called a daiseycutter). :bomb:
Michael Moore speaks to his adoring fans: :apple:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :baby::baby::baby::baby:
NotQiteEinstein
October 20th 2004, 06:57 PM
I hear Bush has a plan to come to our homes and print a bunch of documents to use up all our laser printer cartridges.
And he's going to ban bingo. Hear that, old people? He's going to take your bingo!
And George Bush is the reason your grandkids never call!
Arnold
October 20th 2004, 07:08 PM
John sKerry gives major speech on dealing with terrorism: :sos:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :yipee::yipee::yipee::yipee:
Ulmo
October 20th 2004, 07:21 PM
I'm done trying to reason with libs, I just make fun of them.:hehe:
:lol: :lmbo: :rofl:
The joy is that there is so much material to work with. :cheers:
Arnold
October 20th 2004, 07:25 PM
A John Edwards rally: :solly: "and the lame will walk..."
. . . . . . . . . . . :yipee::yipee::yipee::yipee:
Lily
October 20th 2004, 07:36 PM
This just in:
He will put one of those
white gristly things in every burger
He will make it forever winter and never Christmas
:shocked:
Arnold
October 20th 2004, 07:39 PM
Jacques Chirac rebuffs John sKerry's attempt to get France to send troops to Iraq: :potty:
Losvedir
October 20th 2004, 07:42 PM
I have heard that the president has pledged not to introduce the draft while he is in office. If this is true, then that is good new for the terrorists. It means that as long as they can prolong the chaos in Iraq, then we can be forced to withdraw. Because, in the case of their being not enough troops to defend the US, operate in other countries, and remain in force in Iraq, we will have to withdraw from Iraq; the draft not being an option (which it always is, BTW).
What if we were attacked by a foreign country?! How about 2,3,4 foreign countries? (The president has said: "Bring 'em on"!) What if we were forced to mobilize 2 or 3 defensive retaliations? What if the country was really at risk of being taken over? Even then?...NO DRAFT!?!? :lol:
Do you understand the principals of mathematics? IF the generals decide there aren't enough troops, then there will be; a) a draft, or b) a withdrawal/surrender. There is NO other option. No leader refuses the military more troops if the stakes are high enough. For you to believe that the president would NEVER institute the draft makes you one of the most gullible people in the country. This is an example of a politically expedient white lie.
"We will most likely not need a draft, so why get everyone worked up about it. Pretend that there is a no-draft policy."
I don't think it's too much of a problem because if a legitimate threat does arise then I think people will be more than happy to fight for their country again. It's just people have realized what an unnecessary mess Iraq is and have become disillusioned. I think if the country can't muster troops that should tell the leadership that they really should withdraw since it's not a war worth fighting.
Another option is the administration raises the pay for soldiers. That'll draw more if worst somehow comes to worst.
Arnold
October 20th 2004, 07:45 PM
John sKerry disembarking Air Force One in Paris: :sos:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :yipee::yipee::yipee::yipee:
NotQiteEinstein
October 20th 2004, 08:37 PM
This just in:
Pinstripes on cars will no longer be parallel
No more vitamin D in milk
Every apple will have a worm and potato chips will all be broken in half.
Arnold
October 20th 2004, 08:40 PM
This just in:
Pinstripes on cars will no longer be parallel
No more vitamin D in milk
Every apple will have a worm and potato chips will all be broken in half.
:hehe:
Arnold
October 20th 2004, 08:42 PM
Another John sKerry rally: :squidw:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :rtt::rtt::rtt::rtt:
Ben Franklin
October 20th 2004, 11:02 PM
I'm done trying to reason with libs, I just make fun of them.
That was a short trip...! Hey, BTW, I thought you WERE a liberal...?!
Arnold
October 20th 2004, 11:41 PM
Another John sKerry rally: :cirrobot:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :nails::nails::nails::nails:
Benster
October 21st 2004, 09:26 AM
Riiiiiiight. Well, considering how long it took for them to kill 1000 soldiers, they'll be able to force us to withdraw in about, oh, a hundred years or so.
But we can't afford to lose all our troops! Obviously. You don't usually win a war with no men left on the ground. You have to have back-ups, deployments in many positions. And you haven't even touched the argument about further deployments in other nations.
Do you believe the president when he states that he would never, under any circumstances, institute a draft?
Arnold
October 21st 2004, 11:07 AM
Let's see. W said he won't have a draft. He said he would bring troops home from Europe and S Korea. He said the military would get smaller and more specialized.
John sKerry criticized W's stance on bringing troops home from Europe and S Korea. John sKerry said he will increase the military by 40,000 troops.
Who do you think is most likely to institute a draft?
Benster
October 21st 2004, 11:40 AM
It's very unlikely that we'll see a draft any time in the future. That's not my point. But to promise that you'll never call for a draft is irresponsible. The draft is not really a choice. In certain circumstances, it is necessary.
But, to answer your question, I think that with a more responsive, careful president, and one without parasitic ties to Saudi Arabian oil sheikhs, we won't have so many wars to fight, terrorism will be less likely to bite us on the behind further down the road.
For the president to pledge that he will undergo military withdrawals is pie-in-the-sky. With his policies, withdrawals are not possible. His strategy is to pressure with threat. If you pull out the threats, where is the pressure? And the skinnier, more effective military is like the more sensitive war gaffe of Kerry's. It doesn't make sense. And Rumsfeld has been talking about it for 10 years, and done virtually nothing. What's needed are plans to win wars...not start more of them. On that, I think we can agree.
Arnold
October 21st 2004, 03:42 PM
But, to answer your question, I think that with a more responsive, careful president, and one without parasitic ties to Saudi Arabian oil sheikhs,
Oh sheesh!?! I thought we could have a resonable discussion, but I see now that you are just another of the left-wing liberal kook fringe: :yipee:
Ben Franklin
October 21st 2004, 04:05 PM
Let's see. W said he won't have a draft.
Never say never...! Watch out, North Korea...!
You can run, but you can't... ah, never mind...
He said he would bring troops home from Europe and S Korea.
SEE...!? I told ya Bush wrote off them South Korean gooks...!
Bush is royally screwing over South Korea...! (http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?t=38521&highlight=korea)
He said the military would get smaller and more specialized.
He ain't lyin...! And it's only one speciality: Rifle training...!
John sKerry criticized W's stance on bringing troops home from Europe and S Korea.
Yeah, you know, if Dubya'd said keep 'em, Kerry'd said take 'em out...! That guy...!
John sKerry said he will increase the military by 40,000 troops.
Sounds like the exact amount Bush said he'd reduce...! Hm...?
Who do you think is most likely to institute a draft?
Who wants ta fight anywhere, anytime...? Bush...!
Arnold
October 21st 2004, 04:15 PM
What!?! Am I cursed? TWO liberal kook fringe nuts in a row: :yipee::yipee:
Arnold
October 21st 2004, 04:21 PM
SEE...!? I told ya Bush wrote off them South Korean gooks...!
Typical liberal nut. I'm sure at another time he could rip off a terrific rant about how conservatives are so racist.
Liberal hypocrite: :yipee:
Ben Franklin
October 21st 2004, 04:27 PM
What!?! Am I cursed? TWO liberal kook fringe nuts in a row
Hey, hey, hey...! That's MR. Liberal Kook Fringe Nut ta you...! :hrm: An' ya better take a cold, hard, look in th' mirror, pal, 'coz I'm countin' THREE...! :yipee::yipee::yipee:
Arnold
October 21st 2004, 04:45 PM
Liberals respond to news of Castro's fall: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :egad::egad::egad::egad:
Then they hear he only fell to the ground and was not seriously hurt: :yipee::yipee::yipee::yipee:
Ben Franklin
October 21st 2004, 04:50 PM
Typical liberal nut. I'm sure at another time he could rip off a terrific rant about how conservatives are so racist.
Liberal hypocrite
Don't get all cry-baby on me now, Arnold...! Ya gotta good parody rant goin' here, an' I'm gettin' in on th' action...! Ya gotta problem wi' 'dat...?! :ahem:
Ya mean, youse wuzn't serious 'bout da draft question-thingy...? :huh::huh:
Ben Franklin
October 21st 2004, 04:51 PM
Liberals respond to news of Castro's fall: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :egad::egad::egad::egad:
Then they hear he only fell to the ground and was not seriously hurt: :yipee::yipee::yipee::yipee:
:rofl:
c0bra
October 21st 2004, 04:55 PM
I heard that if Bush becomes president the likelihood of papercuts will increase 100%, cookies will be neither chewy nor crunchy and we'll have Y2K for real this time!
Arnold
October 21st 2004, 04:55 PM
John sKerry goes to the bathroom: :jaltus:
Benster
October 22nd 2004, 01:09 PM
Who's "we"? I never considered for a minute to involve you in a discussion. For a time, I actually thought you were an Artificial Unintelligence program!
You are clearly stuck in the rut of using smilies in substitution for actual words and sentences. This is what you call discussion? Here are some of your posts. Do you think you might be relying a little too much on graphics in your arguments...Ooh, maybe a tad?
" :yipee: "
"Liberals protest global warming: :flaming::flaming::flaming::flaming: "
" :lmbo:
I just heard a Hillary quote:...
:rofl: "
"Go W! :cheers: "
"A John Edwards rally: :solly: "and the lame will walk..."
. . . . . . . . . . . :yipee::yipee::yipee::yipee: "
"John sKerry gives major speech on dealing with terrorism: :sos:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :yipee::yipee::yipee::yipee: "
Another John sKerry rally: :squidw:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :rtt::rtt::rtt::rtt:
Just a representative sample. You have a real addiction on your hands, my friend. Lame, even for a sophomore.
Ben Franklin
October 22nd 2004, 06:11 PM
BTW, when I read the thread title, I assumed it meant Bush was moonlighting as an insurance arsonist...! Boy, was I wrong...! :ahem: :rofl: :hrm: :teeth:
Sheepdog
October 22nd 2004, 06:56 PM
i found this thread mildly entertaining :hehe:
Arnold
October 22nd 2004, 07:00 PM
Who's "we"? I never considered for a minute to involve you in a discussion. For a time, I actually thought you were an Artificial Unintelligence program!
You are clearly stuck in the rut of using smilies in substitution for actual words and sentences. This is what you call discussion? Here are some of your posts. Do you think you might be relying a little too much on graphics in your arguments...Ooh, maybe a tad?
" :yipee: "
"Liberals protest global warming: :flaming::flaming::flaming::flaming: "
" :lmbo:
I just heard a Hillary quote:...
:rofl: "
"Go W! :cheers: "
"A John Edwards rally: :solly: "and the lame will walk..."
. . . . . . . . . . . :yipee::yipee::yipee::yipee: "
"John sKerry gives major speech on dealing with terrorism: :sos:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :yipee::yipee::yipee::yipee: "
Another John sKerry rally: :squidw:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :rtt::rtt::rtt::rtt:
Just a representative sample. You have a real addiction on your hands, my friend. Lame, even for a sophomore.
Ahhh... notice the humor in the thread title and most of the posts...
:doh: Oh wait, silly me, you are a liberal: :yipee: You are totally humorless: :glare:
To you everything must be properly framed in doom and gloom. Sorry, but many of us here are conservatives and we like to laugh, even if it is from sophmoric little smilies.
BTW I'm glad they bother you to the point you would be so nice as to go to the trouble to showcase them in one post.
---------------------------------
"No, no little Benster, you can't actually knock sense into yourself with a hammer..." :metro:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ."Here let me help': :bonk:
Losvedir
October 22nd 2004, 07:08 PM
Ahhh... notice the humor in the thread title and most of the posts...
:doh: Oh wait, silly me, you are a liberal: :yipee: You are totally humorless: :glare:
To you everything must be properly framed in doom and gloom. Sorry, but many of us here are conservatives and we like to laugh, even if it is from sophmoric little smilies.
BTW I'm glad they bother you to the point you would be so nice as to go to the trouble to showcase them in one post.
---------------------------------
"No, no little Benster, you can't actually knock sense into yourself with a hammer..." :metro:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ."Here let me help': :bonk:
I can't tell if I'm going crazy or you're getting cleverer.
Sheepdog
October 22nd 2004, 07:13 PM
yeah. one thing about conservatives, the seem to actually have a better sense of humor.
this site is evidence of that: www.evilconservatives.com
Arnold
October 22nd 2004, 07:14 PM
I can't tell if I'm going crazy or you're getting cleverer.
Maybe you are developing a sense of humor: :rofl:
:wink:
Next thing you know, you'll be a conservative: :cheers:
Benster
October 25th 2004, 09:47 AM
Smiley humor might be funny if it was actually created by you. But it's more like those lame Ziggy cartoons.
Here's what some outsider wrote about TWeb:
I get the idea that most of those who post to the list are high
schoolers or college students with moronic senses of humor. Their idea
of replying to someone is to fill a post with smilies
It's not that funny. Do you want to hear something really funny?
Arnold
October 25th 2004, 11:13 AM
Smiley humor might be funny if it was actually created by you. But it's more like those lame Ziggy cartoons.
Here's what some outsider wrote about TWeb:
I get the idea that most of those who post to the list are high
schoolers or college students with moronic senses of humor. Their idea
of replying to someone is to fill a post with smilies
It's not that funny. Do you want to hear something really funny?
Get lost sourpuss.
NotQiteEinstein
October 25th 2004, 01:56 PM
Smiley humor might be funny if it was actually created by you. But it's more like those lame Ziggy cartoons.
Here's what some outsider wrote about TWeb:
I get the idea that most of those who post to the list are high
schoolers or college students with moronic senses of humor. Their idea
of replying to someone is to fill a post with smilies
It's not that funny. Do you want to hear something really funny?
Something really funny:
John Kerry Meets with the Queen of England. He asks her, "Your Majesty, how do you run such an efficient government? Are there any tips you can give me?"
"Well," says the Queen, "the most important thing is to surround yourself with intelligent people."
Kerry frowns. "But how do I know the people around me are really intelligent?"
The Queen takes a sip of tea. "Oh, that's easy. You just ask them to answer an intelligent riddle." The Queen pushes a button on her intercom. "Please send Tony Blair in here, would you?"
Tony Blair walks into the room. "Yes, my Queen?" The Queen smiles. "Answer me this, please, Tony. Your mother and father have a child. It is not your brother and it is not your sister. Who is it?"
Without pausing for a moment, Tony Blair answers, "That would be me."
"Yes! Very good," says the Queen.
Kerry goes back home to ask John Edwards, his vice presidential choice the same question.
"John. Answer this for me. Your mother and your father have a child. It's not your brother and it's not your sister. Who is it?"
"I'm not sure," says John Edwards. "Let me get back to you on that one." Edwards goes to his advisors and asks every one, but none can give him an answer.
Finally, he ends up in the men's room and recognizes Colin Powell's shoes in the next stall. Edwards shouts, "Colin! Can you answer this for me? Your mother and father have a child and it's not your brother or your sister. Who is it?" Colin Powell yells back, "That's easy. It's me!"
Edwards smiles, and says, "Thanks!" Then, Edwards goes back to speak with Kerry.
"Say, I did some research and I have the answer to that riddle. It's ColinPowell."
Kerry gets up, stomps over to John Edwards, and angrily yells into his face,
"No, you idiot! It's Tony Blair!"
BA DA Bump :bravo: thank you thank you
Arnold
October 25th 2004, 02:14 PM
Lol!
Sheepdog
October 25th 2004, 06:00 PM
I get the idea that most of those who post to the list are high
schoolers or college students with moronic senses of humor. Their idea
of replying to someone is to fill a post with smilies
It's not that funny. Do you want to hear something really funny?
LOLOLOLOL!!!11!one
t4ht 1z |_4mm3rzzzzz!!!111 LOLOLOLOLOL j00 n00bs!!!!
:mossrose: :banana: :ponder: :fencing: :eek: :b_stomp: :broccoli: :dizzy: :b_mickey: :badger: :b_evil: :sos: :a4h: :bunny: :cucumber: :shrug: :b_bow: :yog: :apple: :banana: :b_cowboy: :juggle: :violin: :cirrobot: :cheshire: :jaltus: :carrot: :b_evil: :b_unripe: :outtie: :bonk: :whip: :joy: :yipee: :ale: :highfive: :baby: :rando: :b_woot: :stop: :poke: :matrixed: :argue: :flaming: :b_lame:
NotQiteEinstein
October 25th 2004, 07:23 PM
Smiley humor might be funny if it was actually created by you. But it's more like those lame Ziggy cartoons.
Here's what some outsider wrote about TWeb:
I get the idea that most of those who post to the list are high
schoolers or college students with moronic senses of humor. Their idea
of replying to someone is to fill a post with smilies
It's not that funny. Do you want to hear something really funny?
"There can be only none" :mossrose:
Arnold
October 25th 2004, 07:53 PM
LOL! LOL! You guys are priceless... LOL!
flipper
October 25th 2004, 08:36 PM
Losvesdir:
I can't tell if I'm going crazy or you're getting cleverer.
I've put him to work, beavering away to try to come up with a more amusing line of schtick. Perhaps it's paying off as he stretches himself to the very limit of his ability? Yes, it may be more smilies, but at least it's fields of smilies. So well done there.
Anyway, Ahn-nold, I'm tempted to ask you who your favorite comedians are, as you seem to be wallowing in the delusion that liberals aren't funny?
Not only are we funny, we're brilliantly so. Also debonair, urbane, thoughtful, and shockingly sexy. And caring. Yes, there are humorless liberals just as there are humorless conservatives but generally the startlingly witless are like geese, they tend to congregate on the wings.
Arnold
October 25th 2004, 08:51 PM
Losvesdir:
I've put him to work, beavering away to try to come up with a more amusing line of schtick. Perhaps it's paying off as he stretches himself to the very limit of his ability? Yes, it may be more smilies, but at least it's fields of smilies. So well done there.
Anyway, Ahn-nold, I'm tempted to ask you who your favorite comedians are, as you seem to be wallowing in the delusion that liberals aren't funny?
Not only are we funny, we're brilliantly so. Also debonair, urbane, thoughtful, and shockingly sexy. And caring. Yes, there are humorless liberals just as there are humorless conservatives but generally the startlingly witless are like geese, they tend to congregate on the wings.
Well duder has shown some potential, and at least can take a joke at his expense. And Ben Franklin and Losvedir have shown some hope on this thread, but the rest of the liberals here at TWeb seem to be of those who "tend to congregate on the wings", including you.
Ben Franklin
October 25th 2004, 09:05 PM
And Ben Franklin and Losvedir have shown some hope on this thread...
Thanks, Arn-man...! Speaking for myself, (paraphrasing Dick Cavett on Groucho Marx), I'm serious, but never when you want me to be...! :lol:
Arnold
October 25th 2004, 09:08 PM
Thanks, Arn-man...! Speaking for myself, (paraphrasing Dick Cavett on Groucho Marx), I'm serious, but never when you want me to be...! :lol:
I wouldn't want it any other way Ben: :yipee:
flipper
October 25th 2004, 09:42 PM
Well duder has shown some potential, and at least can take a joke at his expense. And Ben Franklin and Losvedir have shown some hope on this thread, but the rest of the liberals here at TWeb seem to be of those who "tend to congregate on the wings", including you.
No, no, NO!
F-. Again
The tiny amount of progress you have made has been completely reversed by this post. For now, I grow weary of your slaw-jacked idiocy and you may withdraw from my presence. Before our next session I expect you to have practiced your "help me suck less" scales until your simpering little brain starts to bleed out of your ears. Now go!
Arnold
October 25th 2004, 10:08 PM
No, no, NO!
F-. Again
The tiny amount of progress you have made has been completely reversed by this post. For now, I grow weary of your slaw-jacked idiocy and you may withdraw from my presence. Before our next session I expect you to have practiced your "help me suck less" scales until your simpering little brain starts to bleed out of your ears. Now go!
Oh I get it - this is supposed to be an example of liberal humor.
OK then - ha ha ha little flipper liberal: :yipee:
[Hope you feel better now...]
NotQiteEinstein
October 26th 2004, 12:46 AM
No, no, NO!
F-. Again
The tiny amount of progress you have made has been completely reversed by this post. For now, I grow weary of your slaw-jacked idiocy and you may withdraw from my presence. Before our next session I expect you to have practiced your "help me suck less" scales until your simpering little brain starts to bleed out of your ears. Now go!
I cannot believe how incredibly stupid you are. I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. You are trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid collapsed on itself so far that even the neutrons have collapsed. Stupid gotten so dense that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. You emit more stupid in one second than our entire galaxy emits in a year. Quasar stupid. Nothing in our universe can really be this stupid. Perhaps this is some primordial fragment from the original big bang of stupid. Some pure essence of a stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that we know. I'm sorry. I can't go on. This is an epiphany of stupid for me. After this, you may not hear from me again for a while. I don't have enough strength left to deride your ignorant questions and half baked comments.
BA DA Bump :bravo: thank you thank you
Arnold
October 26th 2004, 12:58 AM
Yeah! What he said...
And you're not very smart either... :rasberry:
flipper
October 26th 2004, 02:13 AM
Now Arnold, I know you're eager to be let out of your heated kennel to go toe-to-toe with the big dogs, but this sort of thing just illustrates what a dreadful mistake that would be. A lavender-scented be-pompomed, pomandered, primped-out pooch such as yourself should never take the risk of yapping at his betters, even if he thinks he's safely under the protection of a Big Dog (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_02.php). Alas, in this case your protector is just an ineffectual cardboard cut out. Any idiot could have seen that except, apparently, yourself.
See, NotQuiteEinstein is not above taking credit for other people's work. I knew immediately when I read it because, unlike most of his bleating and maundering or the other example of plagiarism that I bothered to check (no doubt there are more), this was actually quite well written.
I cannot believe how incredibly stupid you are. I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid... This is an epiphany of stupid for me. After this, you may not hear from me again for a while. I don't have enough strength left to deride your ignorant questions and half baked comments.
BA DA Bump thank you thank you
"BA DA Bump thank you thank you" In-deed, NotQuiteEinstein.
I own you. Get used to it.
And Arnold? Back in your box! Shoo!
NotQiteEinstein
October 26th 2004, 02:59 AM
Now Arnold, I know you're eager to be let out of your heated kennel to go toe-to-toe with the big dogs, but this sort of thing just illustrates what a dreadful mistake that would be. A lavender-scented be-pompomed, pomandered, primped-out pooch such as yourself should never take the risk of yapping at his betters, even if he thinks he's safely under the protection of a Big Dog (http://www.politicsforum.org/images/flame_warriors/flame_02.php). Alas, in this case your protector is just an ineffectual cardboard cut out. Any idiot could have seen that except, apparently, yourself.
See, NotQuiteEinstein is not above taking credit for other people's work. I knew immediately when I read it because, unlike most of his bleating and maundering or the other example of plagiarism that I bothered to check (no doubt there are more), this was actually quite well written.
"BA DA Bump thank you thank you" In-deed, NotQuiteEinstein.
I own you. Get used to it.
And Arnold? Back in your box! Shoo!
Dude I'm posting humor. It's called the Ultimate flame it's been circulating the net for years. Your a real SHerLOCK.:ahem:
flipper
October 26th 2004, 03:08 AM
Shouldn't have posted the "thank you thank you" bit then, should you?
If you cut and paste without attribution then you leave yourself vulnerable to great big jerks like myself. It's as wise a strategy as going on the Jerry Springer show in the hopes of getting delicate psychological counseling. Had I been you, I would have openly tagged it as a cut and paste and indicated that it's all the target is worth. Contemptuous and economic - ideal for the vindictive slacker.
Arnold
October 26th 2004, 07:56 PM
Shouldn't have posted the "thank you thank you" bit then, should you?
If you cut and paste without attribution then you leave yourself vulnerable to great big jerks like myself. It's as wise a strategy as going on the Jerry Springer show in the hopes of getting delicate psychological counseling. Had I been you, I would have openly tagged it as a cut and paste and indicated that it's all the target is worth. Contemptuous and economic - ideal for the vindictive slacker.Look flipper, I understand it is not fun to be the butt of other's jokes when you don't have any whit or humor to respond with yourself. It's just that you are such a perfect target because you such an accomodating sourpuss who wishes to prove it over and over again.
---------------------------------
"Now little flipper, we already went through this about knocking sense into yourself with a hammer."
"And no, you can't knock humor into yourself with a hammer either": :metro:
flipper
October 26th 2004, 09:11 PM
Hmmm.
Arnold, all joking aside, how old are you? Are you still in school?
Arnold
October 26th 2004, 09:16 PM
Hmmm.
Arnold, all joking aside, how old are you? Are you still in school?
Oh flipper :yipee: - I hardly think we've dated enough for you to know such intimate details.
flipper
October 26th 2004, 11:34 PM
Well your 2nd-to-last-post just sounded... young. I've not yet reached the stage of willingly holding flame wars with school kids, no matter what sort of a lippy young upstart they might be.
So, school's out for now. I'm abandoning hostilities and will instead respectfully request that you be a little less rude, particularly to people whose political ideologies you vehemently disagree with.
I prefer to waste my efforts excoriating cranky old Conservatives without a polite bone in their bodies, and too old to know better.
Arnold
October 27th 2004, 08:16 PM
Well your 2nd-to-last-post just sounded... young. I've not yet reached the stage of willingly holding flame wars with school kids, no matter what sort of a lippy young upstart they might be.
So, school's out for now. I'm abandoning hostilities and will instead respectfully request that you be a little less rude, particularly to people whose political ideologies you vehemently disagree with.
I prefer to waste my efforts excoriating cranky old Conservatives without a polite bone in their bodies, and too old to know better.
Well that's a shame flipper :yipee: You're such an easy target and quite inspiring. I'll miss your voluteering to be the head for my hammer: :bonk:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.