Announcement

Collapse

Prayer Requests and Praise Reports Guidelines

Post your prayers, your words of encouragement, edification and help to another in this thread.

This area is strictly non-debate, all faiths or non-faiths are allowed.

Please keep in mind the rules: here
See more
See less

Good News for Fellow Ministers....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Good News for Fellow Ministers....

    The challenge to the Minister's Housing Allowance has been defeated.

    http://www.guidestone.org/NewsRoom/N...lowance-Upheld

    Source: GuideStone.org

    DALLAS — The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned a lower court’s ruling that the minister’s housing allowance was unconstitutional. In the decision by the Chicago-based appeals court, it determined that the plaintiffs lacked standing to file the suit.

    The appeals court vacated the trial court’s judgment and remanded with instructions to dismiss the case. The plaintiff’s only recourse would be to seek review by the U.S. Supreme Court.

    The appeal was in response to a December 2013 decision by Wisconsin federal judge Barbara Crabb, who had declared the tax-free housing allowance unconstitutional. At the time of her ruling, she stayed the ruling, keeping it from taking effect, until the appeals process could run its course.

    © Copyright Original Source



    Remember, this is not a debate area --- if you wish to argue this, please start a thread. If you have questions, feel free to ask.
    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

  • #2
    I was watching for this one. I view it as an example of something we could have avoided with due diligence.

    http://tektonticker.blogspot.com/201...cs-coming.html

    Comment


    • #3
      I don't get it. If the finding was they didn't have standing, how could they even try the Supreme Court?
      Watch your links! http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/fa...corumetiquette

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by DesertBerean View Post
        I don't get it. If the finding was they didn't have standing, how could they even try the Supreme Court?
        They would have to validate to SCOTUS somehow that they have standing, or con somebody who could legitimately claim "standing" to be their case.
        The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

        Comment

        Related Threads

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by Cow Poke, 04-13-2024, 08:13 AM
        18 responses
        92 views
        2 likes
        Last Post Cow Poke  
        Started by whag, 03-21-2024, 11:19 AM
        2 responses
        28 views
        4 likes
        Last Post Littlejoe  
        Started by Thoughtful Monk, 02-11-2024, 02:47 PM
        5 responses
        54 views
        2 likes
        Last Post Thoughtful Monk  
        Started by mossrose, 11-24-2023, 02:46 PM
        32 responses
        220 views
        1 like
        Last Post rogue06
        by rogue06
         
        Started by Cow Poke, 07-18-2023, 07:27 PM
        40 responses
        391 views
        4 likes
        Last Post Cow Poke  
        Working...
        X