PDA

View Full Version : LaHaye Vs. Hanegraaff: Let’s Get Ready to Rumble!


studyhound
December 31st 2004, 12:17 AM
Pair Takes Fight to Ring in Pay Per View Event
ATLANTIC CITY, NJ – The latest dust-up between two of America’s most prominent evangelical leaders has taken a bizarre turn. On January 29th, from the Trump Hotel in Atlantic City, Hank “The Bible Answer Man” Hanegraaff, and Tim “Rapture Ready” LaHaye will take their public feud to the squared circle in a 12 round bout sponsored by Tyndale House - the publishing house of LaHaye’s “Left Behind” series, and Hanegraaff’s latest, “The Last Disciple.”

The pay per view event is a match up pitting two outspoken proponents of diametrically opposed eschatological views. LaHaye is a pre-millennial dispensationalist, who believes the church will be “raptured” before the onset of a future world wide tribulation where the Antichrist rules the world for seven years prior to Christ’s second coming. Hanegraaff is sympathetic towards the partial preterist view of the end times, which holds that most Bible prophecy was fulfilled in the first century, and the next prophetic event on God’s calendar is the bodily return of Christ to the earth.

At a pre-fight press conference from the lobby in the Trump Hotel, Hanegraaff got in this verbal jab, saying, “Ol’ Tim better hope he’s right, and that he is raptured before the 29th of January. Otherwise, he’s gonna get a mud hole stomped in him.”

LaHaye, mocking Hanegraaff’s well known use of acronyms such as M.A.P.S. (Manuscript Evidence, Archeology, Prophecy and Statistics) to teach and memorize apologetics, fired back, “Hey Dutchboy, I got an acronym for ya - K.O.”

Hanegraaff, displaying the verbal nimbleness that has made him famous on his national radio call-in show, replied, “Oh, you wanna go there, do ya? How ’bout this one: T.L. is S.O. L.”


:hehe:


:sh:

spiritmech
December 31st 2004, 12:20 AM
LOL. No biting ears off either, gentlemen!

Dave G
December 31st 2004, 12:22 AM
"To be the Bible Answer Man, you gotta beat the Bible Answer Man. Whooo!"

Xavier
December 31st 2004, 12:22 AM
:fight:

studyhound
December 31st 2004, 12:27 AM
“All I can say is, eat your vegetables, take your vitamins, and say your prayers Hanegraaff. Watcha gonna do when Rayford Steele, Buck Williams and Tribulation Force-a-mania run wild on you!? Can you smell what the Rock of our salvation is cookin’!?”

dizzle
December 31st 2004, 12:29 AM
I liked the graphic

spiritmech
December 31st 2004, 12:37 AM
"Can you smell what the Futurist is cookin'????"

Xavier
December 31st 2004, 12:39 AM
"Can you smell what the Futurist is cookin'????"
Birmstone?

spiritmech
December 31st 2004, 12:40 AM
Birmstone?

That's funny on so many different levels.

studyhound
December 31st 2004, 12:40 AM
:lmbo:

AllDay
December 31st 2004, 12:52 AM
"To be the Bible Answer Man, you gotta beat the Bible Answer Man. Whooo!"
I am both entertained by the hilariousness of your comment and embarassed that I know EXACTLY what you're talking about. :lol:

dynomite
December 31st 2004, 01:39 AM
"To be the Bible Answer Man, you gotta beat the Bible Answer Man. Whooo!"

HYSTERICAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lest we forget, he is a Four Horseman. Spooky!

Raptor
December 31st 2004, 07:53 PM
One from my fav wrestler as a kid...

"Just when you think you got all the answers, I come along and change the questions!"

dynomite
January 2nd 2005, 06:26 PM
One from my fav wrestler as a kid...

"Just when you think you got all the answers, I come along and change the questions!"

Who was that?

Raptor
January 2nd 2005, 08:58 PM
Who was that?
Roddy Piper.

Chief of Staff Lizard
January 3rd 2005, 06:26 PM
Now that's a pay per view I would actually pay to view.

Anyone want to take a wager? :deal:

I'll take Hanegraaff and give you 3 to 1 odds.

Terral
January 4th 2005, 01:40 PM
Faramir:
Faramir >> Now that's a pay per view I would actually pay to view. Anyone want to take a wager? I'll take Hanegraaff and give you 3 to 1 odds.
Since the Preterist and Dispensationalist explanations are both wrong, then why make a wager on who is farther from the truth? I hope the best arguments from both sides are presented here, so that we have the opportunity to show the flaws and inconsistencies in their interpretations.

In Christ,

Terral

studyhound
January 4th 2005, 05:47 PM
Faramir:

Since the Preterist and Dispensationalist explanations are both wrong, then why make a wager on who is farther from the truth? I hope the best arguments from both sides are presented here, so that we have the opportunity to show the flaws and inconsistencies in their interpretations.

In Christ,

Terral
:doh: Thanks for missing the point of the thread. Here, $, theres a dollar now go buy a sense of humor.

:sh: