Hate website's doctrine

[boxy]

I was watching HBO today, and a program was on about hate groups (strangely they only showed WHITE hate groups) and the internet. I can't recall many of the sites mentioned, but one was called "Christian Identity." Anyway, I thought I'd post a link to their doctrine and their alleged biblical justifications. Analyze and discuss...


http://www.kingidentity.com/doctrine.htm

[TheFiveSolas]

Good topic. Welcome to TWeb!

Also, would you post some of the beliefs that you found most offensive. That would help spur discussion.

[Ric]

Yesterday @ 09:28 PM post located here (http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&postid=100791#post100791)
boxy:

I was watching HBO today, and a program was on about hate groups (strangely they only showed WHITE hate groups) and the internet. I can't recall many of the sites mentioned, but one was called "Christian Identity." Anyway, I thought I'd post a link to their doctrine and their alleged biblical justifications. Analyze and discuss...


http://www.kingidentity.com/doctrine.htm

It's a good topic, but I can't look at that site without getting so mad that I might just spit! :rant:

[Socrates]

The best specific answer to this odious group is from teh Christian Research Journal, Identity: A ‘Christian’ religion for white racists (http://www.equip.org/free/DI100.htm).

I also recommend AiG's book One Blood (http://www.answersingenesis.org/onlinestore/gateway.asp?PageType=detail&UID=10-2-114), because this has a chapter splattering pseudo-biblical justifications for white supremacy that the likes of this ‘Christian identity’ use. The AiG article Y-chromosomes confirm Genesis teaching about Abraham (http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2/4304news5-16-2000.asp) splatters anti-semitism and British Israelitism on both scientific and biblical grounds, i.e. obnoxious doctrines that characterize ‘Christian identity’ . As for ‘Christian identity's’ nonsensical prohibition on "whites" marrying non-whites, the AiG article Inter-racial marriage: Is it biblical? (http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/4119.asp) demonstrates the fallacy of this, and tweaks their noses with with the great pic (copied below) of a Caucasian man with his lovely Chinese bride.

[Omega Red]

From THAT web-site "WE BELIEVE that the Man Adam (a Hebrew word meaning: ruddy, to show Blood, flush, turn rosy) is father of the White Race only." blah, blah, blah.

Which ever way you look at how Adam came into this world as the father of modern man (out of Africa or out of Eden - somewhere in the Middle East) his skin colour wouldn't have been white no matter how many thousands of years of artistic expression would allow.

These guys are seriously mentally ill. How do you help them? Councelling, education?

:sad:

[dizzle]

Stoning? (j/k)

[Evangel]

i am sickened :eww: