Tweet
It's a deep read, but a great one for those who like textual criticism.
http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/20...new-testament/
http://deeperwaters.wordpress.com/20...new-testament/
-
-
Veritas vos Liberabit<>< Learn Greek <>< Look here for an Orthodox Church in America<><Ancient Faith Radio
sigpic
I recommend you do not try too hard and ...research as little as possible. Such weighty things give me a headache. - Shunyadragon, Baha'i apologist -
Do the authors (or could you) provide any examples of Ehrman's inconsistencies on this issue? Thanks!אָכֵ֕ן אַתָּ֖ה אֵ֣ל מִסְתַּתֵּ֑ר אֱלֹהֵ֥י יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל מוֹשִֽׁיעַ׃Comment
-
No. They really don't go into that. I think the work itself is a demonstration.Comment
-
Can you please clarify with some examples of what you are saying about Ehrman's different (contradictory?) positions?Originally posted by Apologiaphoenix View Postאָכֵ֕ן אַתָּ֖ה אֵ֣ל מִסְתַּתֵּ֑ר אֱלֹהֵ֥י יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל מוֹשִֽׁיעַ׃Comment
-
http://rosetta.reltech.org/TC/vol03/Ehrman1998.html
In spite of these remarkable [textual] differences, scholars are convinced that we can reconstruct the original words of the New Testament with reasonable (although probably not 100 percent) accuracy. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings 3rd ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), 481.Comment
Comment