PDA

View Full Version : Buchanan condiment assault redux: What the MSM didn't report



The Laughing Man
April 11th 2005, 06:17 PM
The background behind the assult is very disturbing, but not surprising. It was actually the climax to a larger series of typically liberal intolerance and harassment:

The Story Behind the Campus Assault on Pat Buchanan (http://www.flynnfiles.com/archives/culture2005/the_story_behind_the_campus_assault_on_pat_buchanan.html)

According to a Western Michigan University senior, Pat Buchanan wasn't the only conservative assaulted on campus last Thursday. Matt Hall, who organized the Buchanan speech, alleges that a woman's studies professor pushed him from behind and boxed him out after he attempted to retrieve a torn-down poster from the professor's classroom hours before the lecture.

The dousing of Pat Buchanan with salad dressing one week ago today was prefaced with WMU's advisor to student organizations denouncing the event in his newspaper column, professors using class time to label Buchanan a "racist," a faculty-directed effort that resulted in the removal of more than 2,500 fliers promoting the event, and a professor allegedly assaulting the student organizer of the lecture. While a non-WMU student attacked Buchanan, the College Republicans who hosted the commentator believe WMU faculty and administrators created a climate that encouraged the assault.

The professor-student conflict took place in the early afternoon last Thursday. "I saw three girls going around tearing down the Pat Buchanan signs," explained WMU student Jeff Tirrell. "As I went to wait outside my class I saw that they were taking the torn-down fliers into a classroom and handing them to a professor." Tirrell alerted College Republican Chairman Matt Hall that a professor was assigning her students to rip down posters promoting the Buchanan event. Hall then confronted the professor, Edith Fisher, in a classroom in Dunbar Hall.

Seeing his $30 glossy poster promoting the Buchanan speech impaled on the pole holding a Mexican flag, Hall attempted to retrieve his club's property. According to Hall, Fisher shoved him from behind and then elbowed him aside when he tried to take his sign. "No, this is official university property and it's been confiscated," Dr. Fisher allegedly told him. Fisher hasn't responded to emails sent Monday requesting her side of the story.

Several witnesses note that Fisher then crumpled up the large promotional poster and threw it in the trash. At this point, Hall noticed scores of his fliers in the garbage bag. Fisher, several witnesses claim, started screaming at Hall. "I was kind of shocked," Hall explained to me. The incident occured during Fisher's class, Introduction to Women's Studies, with the professor informing Hall: "You're intruding on my class, please leave."

That night, twenty-four-year old community college student Samuel Mesick rushed the podium and dumped a large cup of ranch dressing on Pat Buchanan as he spoke. "The campus police were unable to stop the assault on Buchanan," witness Jason Miller told me, "but responded very rapidly to protect the assailant." In fact, the mohawked assailant screamed for the police when a burly College Republican apprehended him. As for Buchanan, "He was pissed," according to Miller, who wondered if the sixty-six-year old pundit was going to take a swing at the man who disrupted the event. Remarking that he didn't even like ranch dressing, Buchanan stopped the question and answer period and returned to his hotel. The event ended prematurely and Mesick was released on $100 bond.

"This was institutionally acceptable," WMU student Matt Hall believes. "Professors telling their students to tear down fliers. Professors telling students that Pat Buchanan is a racist and a bigot. A professor physically attacking me, a student. An administrator, the advisor to registered student organizations, denouncing the Buchanan speech in his newspaper column. This sort of thing adds up and creates an institutional atmosphere where it becomes acceptable to treat people like scum."

A leftist student's assault on Patrick Buchanan at Western Michigan University generated nationwide attention. Allegations of a leftist professor's assault on a conservative student didn't make headlines. It should have.

:no: Shameful and disgusting, but somehow I think these people are really proud of that assault.

Arnold
April 11th 2005, 06:49 PM
Apparently speech is only free when it is :yipee:iberal speech.

Nicholas
April 11th 2005, 06:50 PM
If this happened it was wrong.

Arnold
April 11th 2005, 06:57 PM
If this happened it was wrong.

Good for you Nicholas - an honest liberal. :thumb:

Truly a rare breed!

Jack777
April 11th 2005, 07:10 PM
There are a lot of instances of physical assaults on people who are Bushies and conservative. Some guy got the waddings beaten out of him because he was for Bush getting elected. Professors are openly discriminating against students and lowering grades if they have any views contrary to theirs. Aside from people who advocate violence and urge kids to kill their parents and other things like that college students have to listen to rants instead of getting taught whatever they signed up for. They teach that terrorists are right and the United States is wrong. The Hamas Covenant states plainly the intentions of terrorists and it is the total eradication of all Jews, Christians, and non-Muslims. Yet this is what professors teach is right. Honestly it amounts to borderline treason, but what else is new? I am starting to think tactics such as using authority as a professor to do unlawful things and enlist students to do so requires some sort of criminal action against them. They advocate my death and that of my progeny and I think they should go first, not me. I find violence against us because we differ to be increasingly more bold. People from other countries in favor of Jihad against us also join in these kinds of things, such as a Palestinian supporter punching out a Navy guy outside a base in Puerto Rico. The protests during the inauguration were a disgrace and had all these threats against us. I am getting fed up.

People tried to defend an innocent woman and the Left was filled with hatred for us because of it. Their mode of threatening and carrying out violence is a pattern.

jason
April 11th 2005, 07:17 PM
:no: Shameful and disgusting, but somehow I think these people are really proud of that assault.
What do you expect ?

I think the problem is that you are mistaking many on the radical left for adults and not spoilt little kids with an entitlement mentality.

Jason

KeepinItReal
April 11th 2005, 07:23 PM
The background behind the assult is very disturbing, but not surprising. It was actually the climax to a larger series of typically liberal intolerance and harassment:

The Story Behind the Campus Assault on Pat Buchanan (http://www.flynnfiles.com/archives/culture2005/the_story_behind_the_campus_assault_on_pat_buchanan.html)
Thanks for posting this article!

brother vinny
April 11th 2005, 07:28 PM
Uh, is this what is considered ad-dressing the guest speaker? :outtie:

FreeBrightMind
April 11th 2005, 07:28 PM
Ranch dressing?! Thank gawd it wasn't chunky blue cheese! :lol:

AtheistArchon
April 11th 2005, 08:21 PM
- :hehe:

Amazing Rando
April 12th 2005, 03:15 PM
And just for sheer liberal giggles, here's that photo of Buchanan covered in salad dressing again. Oh what the heck... it's too good to view only once!

Pilgrim
April 12th 2005, 03:43 PM
is this for real? I can't help but notice it was a headline on April 1st.

Amazing Rando
April 12th 2005, 03:50 PM
It was. I started a thead on this already, but Jinx chose a new thread to post his new insight into the case.

Pilgrim
April 12th 2005, 04:27 PM
ahh. While a can appreciate the protestors spunk...come on, that's just stupid. Surely there are more productive ways of making ones objections known?

Arnold
April 12th 2005, 04:40 PM
ahh. While a can appreciate the protestors spunk...come on, that's just stupid. Surely there are more productive ways of making ones objections known?

:cheers: To you and Nicholas - sensible liberals.

Pilgrim
April 12th 2005, 04:43 PM
:cheers: To you and Nicholas - sensible liberals.
With all do respect, I'm not a liberal. Well, on some issues I am, but by and large, I am a moderate.

Arnold
April 12th 2005, 04:47 PM
With all do respect, I'm not a liberal. Well, on some issues I am, but by and large, I am a moderate.

OK. I just have trouble telling the difference sometimes. :wink:

Nonetheless, I'm sure you won't mind being lumped in with Nicholas - he's the most pleasant liberal on the board. :teeth:

wfaber
April 12th 2005, 04:52 PM
Was it a tossed salad?

Nicholas
April 12th 2005, 05:08 PM
Nonetheless, I'm sure you won't mind being lumped in with Nicholas - he's the most pleasant liberal on the board

Me? Pleasant? I'm sure you could find some people who might disagree with that description... :wink:

Arnold
April 12th 2005, 06:41 PM
Me? Pleasant? I'm sure you could find some people who might disagree with that description... :wink:

Yeah - but who is a harsher critic of liberals than me? :teeth:

Nicholas
April 12th 2005, 06:42 PM
Yeah - but who is a harsher critic of liberals than me?

Point taken.

Jack777
April 13th 2005, 01:48 PM
The horns are distracting somewhat though.

Paul
April 13th 2005, 02:11 PM
Everyone thinks they are moderate. The alternative is immoderate.

Jack777
April 13th 2005, 02:18 PM
Has anyone noticed that moderates and liberals are turning more to condiments, pies, and cereals to express anger and violence? Is there some book circulating underground by the Communists for Constant Change and the Conservatives for Constant Compromise about food? They starved Terri Schiavo to death in front of God and national TV. This is a pattern. What is next? Don't tell me, I don't want to know.

Pilgrim
April 13th 2005, 02:34 PM
No, I have not noticed that. But, you know, if your dillusions are working for you, stick with them.

Nicholas
April 13th 2005, 02:42 PM
They starved Terri Schiavo to death in front of God and national TV. This is a pattern.

Just wondering, but where would something have to be to not be in front of God?

KeepinItReal
April 13th 2005, 02:43 PM
Just wondering, but where would something have to be to not be in front of God?
Good question...

KeepinItReal
April 13th 2005, 03:02 PM
http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=7145

No Leniency for Leftist Hatemongers
by Patrick X. Coyle
Posted Apr 13, 2005

"…though liberals do a great deal of talking about hearing other points of view, it sometimes shocks them to learn that there are other points of view."
--William F. Buckley
National Review
Jan 11, 1956.

On March 31, 900 students, faculty and community members gathered in a Western Michigan University lecture hall to hear Pat Buchanan talk about immigration and the culture war. The conservatives on campus, led by Young America's Foundation (YAF) supporter Matt Hall, had worked tirelessly to bring Buchanan to their campus. They had a track record of hosting and organizing many successful events featuring YAF speakers and convinced the school to provide them with a substantial portion of Buchanan's honorarium. As in most cases though, YAF underwrote a portion of the fee because the school didn't cover his entire honorarium......................

KeepinItReal
April 14th 2005, 10:08 AM
It's only funny until someone loses a pie
Posted: April 13, 2005
7:40 p.m. Eastern

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43792

© 2005 Ann Coulter

Liberals enjoy claiming that they are intellectuals, thrilled to engage in a battle of wits. This, they believe, distinguishes them from conservatives, who are religious fanatics who react with impotent rage to opposing ideas. As one liberal, Jonathan Chait, put the cliche in the New Republic: Bush is an "instinctive anti-intellectual" and his administration hostile to "fact-driven debate." In a favorable contrast, Clinton is "the former Rhodes scholar who relished academic debates." Showing his usual reverence for fact-checking, the New York Times' Paul Krugman says the Republican Party is "dominated by people who believe truth should be determined by revelation, not research."

I'm not sure how these descriptions square with the fact that liberals keep responding to conservative ideas by throwing food. (Remember the good old days when liberals' "fact-driven" ideas only meant throwing money at their problems?) *click link for rest*

Jack777
April 14th 2005, 11:06 AM
There is an expression, "in front of God and everybody," I altered. I guess its always in front of God, just not always on national TV...


Okay, okay, now they are spiking chili at Wendy's with body parts. Food as a means to wealth, food as a place to store extra fingers....cereal abuse allegations...

Food and water, then food and now its back to water. First food and now water. The contractor that was captured by the terrorists was helping bring clean water to the people in Iraq. The Death Culture has this thing about food and water and making people pay dearly. Is this something like a lesson they are teaching us? Some lady in a hospice was being starved and dehydrated and complained that she was hungry and thirsty so the doctor gave her enough morphine to shut her up and she died some time ago. If you are Pro Life, its food in the face.

Pilgrim
April 15th 2005, 10:04 AM
It's only funny until someone loses a pie
Posted: April 13, 2005
7:40 p.m. Eastern

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43792

© 2005 Ann Coulter

Liberals enjoy claiming that they are intellectuals, thrilled to engage in a battle of wits. This, they believe, distinguishes them from conservatives, who are religious fanatics who react with impotent rage to opposing ideas. As one liberal, Jonathan Chait, put the cliche in the New Republic: Bush is an "instinctive anti-intellectual" and his administration hostile to "fact-driven debate." In a favorable contrast, Clinton is "the former Rhodes scholar who relished academic debates." Showing his usual reverence for fact-checking, the New York Times' Paul Krugman says the Republican Party is "dominated by people who believe truth should be determined by revelation, not research."

I'm not sure how these descriptions square with the fact that liberals keep responding to conservative ideas by throwing food. (Remember the good old days when liberals' "fact-driven" ideas only meant throwing money at their problems?) *click link for rest*
As usual, the typical Tweb fallacy of confusing the action of one nut job with the intent of an entire group. It is such reasoning that leads to racism and bigotry.

jason
April 15th 2005, 05:24 PM
Everyone thinks they are moderate. The alternative is immoderate.
I'm not a moderate. Politcally I wish to be as far to the Christ as I can possibly be.

Jason

Amazing Rando
April 15th 2005, 05:31 PM
I'm not a moderate. Politcally I wish to be as far to the Christ as I can possibly be.

Jason

Then I would suggest you read The Politics of Jesus (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0802807348/qid=1113600563/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i1_xgl14/102-0868831-6847323?v=glance&s=books&n=507846) and Jesus and Politics: Confronting the Powers (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0801027845/qid=1113600563/sr=8-2/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i2_xgl14/102-0868831-6847323?v=glance&s=books&n=507846). They'll help you conform your politics to Christ. :teeth: