PDA

View Full Version : OUR FEATURED MEMBER ARTICLE: Evangelizing Children by angie love



Trout
February 13th 2006, 04:18 PM
Evangelizing Children

by angie love

Besides being known as great Christian leaders, Jonathan Edwards, Amy Carmichael, Corrie Ten Boom and Dr. Isaac Watts have something else in common. They were all saved before they were ten years old, one as early as three. And according to Charles H. Spurgeon “a child of five, if properly instructed, can savingly believe as well as an adult.” Despite this wealth of personal testimony of childhood conversions, there is debate as to whether or not a child under the age of twelve can or should be told the Gospel and be given the chance to receive Jesus as their Savior.

There are four major philosophies of child evangelism, and only one of these actually proposes evangelizing children. The first is the traditional view that the Christian life of the child is brought about through his family. The thought behind this philosophy is that the child who is born in a Christian home is not lost since he is safe under “God’s covenant” by belonging to a Christian home. Christians who hold to this view on child conversion will baptize their children when they are infants, and believe that this baptism will keep them ‘safe’ until they are old enough (an adolescent) to choose to receive Jesus as their Savior. The main emphasis of this philosophy is on the family and the Christian home. The problem with this viewpoint is the fact that most of the children born are not born into Christian families. They don’t have the advantage of being brought up with the knowledge of the Lord. In fact, 70-80% of children don’t have Christian parents according to Dr. Martha Wright, the Vice President of Education for Child Evangelism Fellowship® .. Also lost in this philosophy is the personal aspect of salvation. The children aren’t encouraged to have a personal relationship with Jesus because they aren’t thought of as needing Him yet. According to Romans 3:23 “all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God,” even children born into Christian homes.

The second philosophy of child evangelism is the educational philosophy.

This viewpoint states that from a very early age the child should receive biblical education and through the process of knowing more about God and the Christian life he will receive Jesus as his Savior. The main emphasis is placed on education. It is thought that while learning about the Bible and gaining head knowledge of God, children will be saved when they are old enough to understand. In 1 Corinthians 2:14 the apostle Paul states that men will never understand the things of God, “But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.” Without the working of the Holy Spirit, no one, including children, can come to a saving knowledge of God. A dead plant can get all the love, sunlight, water and fertilizer available, but it will still be a dead plant, it is not going to come alive. Children, in the same way, will not become saved through Sunday school, memorizing Bible verses and going to a Christian church. In fact, according to George Barna, a leading researcher of the Evangelical church today, “there has been a 92% increase in the number of unchurched Americans in the last thirteen years. In 1991 there were 39 million unchurched Americans compared with 75 million currently” (www.barna.org). The children of these unchruched Americans won’t have the chance to learn about God at church since they won’t be there.

The Psychological philosophy of child evangelism is that children aren’t able to understand abstract concepts such as salvation, and don’t have the ability to reason. According to this viewpoint, children don’t have the mental capacity to receive Jesus as their Savior until they are around the age of 12. This philosophy is based largely on the work of psychologist Jean Piaget who studied the mental development of children. Piaget concluded that children before the age of about 12 can only grasp concrete ideas, and not abstract ideas. But this philosophy assumes that salvation is based on intellectual understanding. Salvation, in actuality, is based on faith not head knowledge as said in Ephesians 2:8-9: “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.” As with the first two philosophies, the working of the Holy Spirit is not mentioned or taken into consideration with the psychological viewpoint. While it is reasonable to say that children under the age of 12 can’t understand abstract thoughts, “abstract concepts can be understood through concrete ideas” (Martha Wright). Billy Graham, a well-known evangelist, said “I am certain that the Gospel is just as real to the small child as to the educated adult.”

The fourth and final philosophy on child evangelism is the viewpoint held by Child Evangelism Fellowship. The Gospel should be presented to children at the earliest age possible so that the Holy Spirit can work on the kids’ hearts, and they can receive Jesus as their Savior. Then, in light of the heart change that occurred when they were saved, the child will grow in the Lord and will develop Christian character. According to this philosophy, the biblical requirement for salvation is childlike faith, as opposed to faith based on reason and intelligence. This final viewpoint is the viewpoint that Christians should take on child evangelism, given the wealth of scripture verses supporting it. There are many verses in the Old Testament book of Deuteronomy addressing children. Deuteronomy 4:1-10 is a key passage in the Old Testament concerning children. In verses nine and ten, the Israelites are charged to remember what the Lord has done for them. The warning given in verse nine is that if they didn’t constantly remind themselves of the Lord’s guidance and hand in their lives, they would forget what He has done for them, and His commandments would depart from their hearts. He urged them to teach the Lord’s commandments to their children and to tell them all the powerful works that He had performed. The Hebrew word for children in verse ten is bên, which means a son as a builder of the family name. The people of Israel were charged to pass down with the family name the commandments of God. Not only were the Israelites told to know what the commandments were, but according to verse nine, it was assumed that the Law was in their hearts. They weren’t supposed to only pass down head knowledge of the Law to their children, but to teach their children to hide it in their hearts.

Deuteronomy 6:1-9 also emphasized the importance God placed on the children knowing Him and His laws. Verse two in this passage refers to keeping God’s commandments and statutes. Not only are the men told to keep God’s Law, but his son, and his “son’s son” were expected to know it and keep it as well. It was expected that the Israelites teach their children the way of the Lord, and not only to obey God but, according to verse six, they were to have God’s words in their heart. They were told in verses seven through nine how to give their children a love for the ways of God. They were to “teach them diligently,” to talk of God’s words all throughout the day, to have them as a sign on their hand and forehead and to “write them upon the posts of thy house, and on thy gates.” Deuteronomy 11:18-21 states: “Therefore shall ye lay up these my words in your heart and in your soul, and bind them for a sign upon your hand, that they may be as frontlets between your eyes. And ye shall teach them your children, speaking of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, when thou liest down, and when thou risest up. And thou shalt write them upon the door posts of thine house, and upon thy gates: That your days may be multiplied, and the days of your children, in the land which the LORD sware unto your fathers to give them, as the days of heaven upon the earth” (King James Version). Not only are the Israelites called to have God’s words in their own hearts and souls, they are told to teach them to their children. They were encouraged to talk about God’s works all the time: when they were at home, traveling, going to bed and waking up. In Deuteronomy 31:9-13 Moses told the people to gather every seven years at the feast of the tabernacles and hear the word being read to them. In verse twelve, Moses tells them to not only gather the men, women and aliens to listen to the Law being read to them, but they were told to also gather the children. The rest of the passage goes on to explain why the children should be there to hear what God’s law says, “that they may learn, and fear the LORD your God, and observe to do all the words of this law: And that their children, which have not known any thing, may hear, and learn to fear the LORD your God, as long as ye live in the land whither ye go over Jordan to possess it” (King James Version). Letting the kids hear what the Lord has spoken, and learn about who God is, will encourage them to have a personal relationship with God. They will see that God is not just interested in adults.

Children are also spoken of in the book of Psalms. In chapter 78 the psalmist charges the people to make known the wonderful works of God to their children. “We will not hide them from their children, shewing to the generation to come the praises of the LORD, and his strength, and his wonderful works that he hath done” (King James Version). In verse five, fathers are commanded to make God’s works known to their children so, “that the generation to come might know them, even the children which should be born.” The works of the Lord were to be such a part of the children’s lives that they tell their own children. Why should the children know God’s mighty works? There are four reasons listed in verses seven and eight: (1) set their hope in God, (2) not forget His works, (3) keep His commandments and (4) not be like their rebellious fathers who did not put their trust in the Lord. It is interesting to note that the first reason listed is a matter of the heart. They were to set their hope in Him, to believe and trust that he would take care of them. They weren’t only to have head knowledge of God, but to have a trusting relationship with Him, to know Him personally.

There are two accounts in the Gospels where Jesus spoke specifically regarding children. The first is Matthew 18:1-14. The disciples asked Jesus who the greatest in the kingdom of heaven was. Jesus calls a little child to him. The Greek word for little child in this passage is paidión which means “a child under seven years of age” (Dictionary of New Testament Theology Vol. 1.p.283). Before Jesus told His disciples who the greatest in the kingdom of heaven was, He wanted them to know what was required to be in the kingdom of heaven in the first place. Jesus was using this paidión as an object lesson. In verse three Jesus says, “Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.” “Little children” once again is the Greek word paidión. The word “converted” is the Greek word strepho which means to turn, change, voluntarily turning from sin. What Jesus was saying is that children, even little children under the age of seven, can be saved. If they have the capability to be saved, they must need to be saved. They can voluntarily turn from their sin and trust in Him to be their Savior, just as readily as adults. He was telling the disciples that for someone to even enter into the kingdom of heaven they must become as little children by having simple faith and trust in Him. In verse four Jesus, with the “paidión” still in His arms, answers their question of who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven: “Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.” Back in this time period children were viewed as less then important. People didn’t think that it was important to value children. Jesus shattered that concept by telling His disciples that the greatest in the kingdom of heaven is anyone who humbles himself, who brings himself down to the level of children. And in verse five He makes His point clear: “And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me.” Not only did Jesus say that one must humble himself as a little child to enter heaven, but He said that if someone welcomes a child in His name, they welcome Him. “To serve or minister to a child is to serve Christ Himself” (Martha Wright). Jesus was giving high priority to children. Following, in verse six Jesus says: “But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” Not only did Jesus say that one must become as a little child to enter into His kingdom, but He said that if anyone even offended a little child it would be better for them if they were dead! At this point, the Greek word for children changes from the word paidión, to mikros, which means little or small, in reference to age or station. For that reason, some people think that Jesus is referring to a new believer here. While mikros does refer to new believers in other passages in the Bible, it does not make sense for it to be referring to new believers in this passage. For one thing, Jesus is holding a little child in His arms while he is talking about children. Then, in verse fourteen, Jesus, while still using the word mikros, says that “it is not the will of your Father which is in heaven, that one of these little ones should perish.” He can’t be referring to new believers in this passage because perish means to be lost eternally in a place of punishment. Believers, once they have received Jesus as their Savior, are saved. They are not in danger of perishing. It is highly unlikely that Jesus would mean ‘new believer’ because as He is talking He is holding a little child in his arms, and earlier, He specifically was speaking of children. He also wouldn’t talk about new believers perishing, since they are already saved. Going back to verse ten of Matthew 18, Jesus warns His disciples to not despise little children because “in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven.” These little ones, which are highly esteemed by Jesus, have angels who see God all the time. It is clear that Jesus placed a high priority on children. Verses eleven through fourteen contain the parable of the lost sheep. While some may say this parable is only for adult believers, one must conclude that, within the context, Jesus was also including children as His sheep, confirming that children can be saved.

The second account of Jesus speaking directly about children comes in the book of Mark. In Mark 10:13-16 Jesus’ disciples saw that parents were bringing their children to Jesus to have Him bless them. The disciples rebuked them, and tried to get them to go away. They thought that Jesus was too busy to take time out to bless the children. When Jesus saw what His disciples were doing, he was “much displeased” and said to them “Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God.” According to Sam Doherty, the former CEF® regional director for Europe, “Children (and those who become like children) can enter the kingdom of God. Let the children come to Christ.” Instead of hindering them in their search for salvation, we should be showing them the Way. In verse fifteen of Mark chapter ten Jesus, once again, stresses the fact that if one wants to be saved and enter the kingdom of heaven, they must come to Jesus like a child. Finally, in verse sixteen, Jesus took the children up in His arms and blessed them. The Greek word for children in this passage of scripture is paidión, which, as stated before, means a child less than seven years of age. Through these two passages in the Bible, it is clear that children held a special place in Jesus’ heart. He warned His disciples to not despise them or offend them, and took them up in His arms and blessed them.

The books of the Gospels aren’t the only books of the New Testament where children are directly referenced. Ephesians 6:1-4 addresses children specifically. The book of Ephesians, as noted in Ephesians 1:1-3, was written to the “saints which are at Ephesus.” The word ‘saints’ means holy ones or believers. Paul gave a direct command to the believing children in Ephesus in chapter six, verse one: “Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right.” The Greek word for children is teknión which means small sons or daughters. Since this letter is directed specifically to the believers in Ephesus, it is safe to say that the children addressed in 6:1 were believers.

In the book of Colossians, which was written for the saints, or believers in Colosse (Colossians 1:1-2), Paul also directly addresses children: “Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord (3:20-21).” These children, teknións, had to be believers, since the letter was written to believers. These children couldn’t come to know the Lord as their Savior without someone telling them the Gospel.

Titus 1:6 is also another account of believing children in the early church. Elders were expected to have “faithful children not accused of riot or unruly.” For the children to be faithful, they have to have faith in the first place.

It would seem reasonable to assume that these three passages are the first examples of child evangelism. These children had to come to know the Lord as their Savior somehow and according to Romans 10:17: “So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.” Someone had to tell them the Good News.

Coming to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ at a young age is not a rarity. In fact, according to George Barna, “43% of all Americans who accept Jesus Christ as their savior do so before reaching the age of 13.” James Dobson, founder and chairman of Focus on the Family, was saved at the age of three, as well as Anne Graham Lotz, the daughter of Billy and Ruth Graham. Matthew Henry, a well-known writer of Bible commentaries, who was saved at the age of 11 said, “It is of great happiness to know the Holy Scriptures from our childhood. The age of childhood is the learning age; and those who would get true learning must get it out of the scriptures” (The Biblical Basis for Child Evangelism, page 58). Sharing the Gospel with kids at an early age, gives them the chance to live the whole rest of their lives for God. “We wonder how old a child needs to be before he can be born again by God’s Holy Spirit. I would encourage you to turn the question around. Ask rather, how young can he come to Christ for salvation…After all, who is it who works salvation in a heart? Is it not Almighty God, the One who created the soul in the first place?” (Alan D. George: Don’t forget the Children, page 23.)

Children are at the right place in their lives to come to know the Lord as their Savior as observed through testimonies of great Christian leaders who have been saved before they reached the age of 12. The Body of Christ has a great responsibility to share the Gospel with kids while they are at this stage in their lives. According to the U.S. Census Bureau the population of the U.S. in 2000 was 281,421,906, of those 25.7% are under the age of 18. And only 7% of the population claims to be Evangelical (George Barna). Evangelical Christians need to share the Good News with these kids who don’t live in Christian homes and who already have the capacity for child-like faith in Jesus since they are children.

The great Christian leaders of tomorrow are the children of today. The Bible clearly states through Old Testament scriptures, through Jesus speaking specifically of little children and through Paul addressing believing children in His letters to the church in Ephesus and Colosse that children have the capacity and the need to receive Jesus as their Savior. For “all we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned, every one, to his own way; and the LORD has laid on Him the iniquity of us all” (Isaiah 53:6). Children need to be saved from their sins just as much as adults do. The Bible, statistics and personal testimonies from people who were saved as children back up this fact. The Christian church today has the chance to make a difference in the lives of these children: to either give them the chance to receive Him as their Savior, or to neglect one of the biggest missions fields in the world.

500



The articles featured in this section are written by members of Tweb. Many of our members are not accustomed to heated debate. This section is moderated accordingly.

If you have any questions as to what is allowed and what isn't, please ask a member of the Tweb staff.

Thanks

T. Paine
February 17th 2006, 05:11 PM
Paine,

Your post violates the decorum in this particular corner of Tweb. Your comments would be welcomed in either Apologetics or the Locker Room. However here, in this thread, they are not allowed.

Any questions about this notice, or the rules here, please don't hesitate to ask me.

Trout


The Psychological philosophy of child evangelism is that children aren’t able to understand abstract concepts such as salvation, and don’t have the ability to reason. According to this viewpoint, children don’t have the mental capacity to receive Jesus as their Savior until they are around the age of 12.

I would strongly disagree with you assertion that children do not have the ability to reason. The first time you got burned you began to learn not to touch things that were hot...did you not? The assertion that a child can not understand the abstract concepts of christian dogma is entirely correct though. That is why you have to wait before you can get them to wrap thier heads around the concept of a god who has created a place of eternal torture, agony and unending pain if they do not love him but at the same time try to convince them that he loves them. There is no reason involved there, only indoctrination.



In 1 Corinthians 2:14 the apostle Paul states that men will never understand the things of God, “But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.” Without the working of the Holy Spirit, no one, including children, can come to a saving knowledge of God.

I've been beat over the head quite a bit with this one. I was a evangelical fundamentalist once. Heavily involved in lay ministry. Spent at least four nights a week at church working or studying or praying. For several years. I've been baptised. I never set foot in a public school until college. Had bible study every day growing up. But when I began to use my critical thinking skills, and asking questions that made folks uncomfortable I decided to leave the fold. Then I was told That "I never was a REAL christian (tm.) to begin with" Even when the same folks told me that the sacred spook er...I mean..the holy spirit was given me as soon as I was saved and accepted JC. Go figure?


According to the U.S. Census Bureau the population of the U.S. in 2000 was 281,421,906, of those 25.7% are under the age of 18. And only 7% of the population claims to be Evangelical (George Barna).

At last, critical thinking and reason are making a comeback.



Children need to be saved from their sins just as much as adults do. The Bible, statistics and personal testimonies from people who were saved as children back up this fact.

A good evangelical friend of mine sent his daughter to Azuza Pacific. She was raised "with the lord", private christian schooling and the whole bit. After one semester she attempted suicide. Where was the sacred spook then? All the hundreds of times I spent on my knees praying for god to give me direction and to help me with my problems with addiction, where was the sacred spook then? Your article is well written but still bothers me nonetheless. Children need to be taught how to use logic, reason and critical thinking skills more than they need to be force fed the mythology of this era.

T. Paine
February 17th 2006, 05:14 PM
Don't really like the question mark under my name....but Deist was not an option. I am a deist in the classical sense of Franklin, Jefferson and Paine.

Peace to All
-Gus

{Tim}
February 18th 2006, 11:46 AM
Meh. You might try to be a little more polite there, Mr Paine, if you want a civil debate. However, I do agree with your point that children can indeed learn; in fact, I've found that they can understand quite a bit, if it's actually explained in terms they can follow. From a Christian perspective, I think the verses about "childlike faith" may be a clue that children can understand "enough", however much that is...

However, my main beef with the article was that, as far as I can see, approaches 2 and 4 are virtually identical, except for emphasis -- and the author heavily criticises approach #2 for failing to mention the role of the Holy Spirit in salvation. While I would agree that faith cannot be based only on abstract knowledge about God, this is not the same as saying we can have faith without knowledge at all. Indeed, a faith which denies reason and intelligence will only result in what happened to "T Paine", as he shared above. (I would assume you actually agree with at least some of this, since you reference the deuteronomy verses telling children to learn the law of God.)

In any case, I would say you should teach the child about God -- his character, as well as abstract knowledge "about" him -- and allow the Holy Spirit to do its work.

Finally, I had some other miscellaneous nitpicks, but I'm too tired to post them right now. Maybe later. Overall, I want to say that I support you in ministering to children, even if I don't agree with everything you wrote. :ahem:

Trout
February 18th 2006, 12:44 PM
Meh. You might try to be a little more polite there, Mr Paine, if you want a civil debate. However, I do agree with your point that children can indeed learn

:huh: That was the authors point as well.

{Tim}
February 19th 2006, 01:10 AM
:huh: That was the authors point as well.
Hmm... I was responding to the comment that it was "reasonable" to say that children under the age of 12 can't handle abstract concepts -- while I agree to an extent, I think the statement is too generalised... they can handle some, if explained in a non-complicated way, and it also varies between different kids. :shrug:

Barbarossa
February 21st 2006, 02:46 PM
I don't think that the average child under 12 has the capacity to fathom what is being pushed on them, and are not discriminatory, which makes child evangelism simply brain-washing. If you want to share the word, share it with their parents. A child brought into the fold without the support of their parents will never stay in the long run.

angie love
February 21st 2006, 08:36 PM
In reply to "brain washing" and "saving the parents before the kids."

I appreciate this post because it shows what child evangelists deal with in the Church. The notion that kids can't be kept in Christ without their parents creates a very weak picture of God. Is the Holy Spirit unable to keep the saved child saved without the help of the almighty parents? This is a statement that is thrown out with no facts or reasonable theology to back it up.
Consider some testimonies from real life Christians.
Dr. Martha Wright, a Floridian who grew up with non-believing parents. Wright was saved at age seven in a neighborhood Good News Club. She later became a missionary and then began to train missionaries for Child Evangelism Fellowship, first in South America and later at the Children’s Ministries Institute™ in Missouri. As a missionary trainer she has prepared thousands of workers to take the Gospel into almost every corner of the globe. Those missionaries have, in turn, won thousands more to the Lord. God has used the life of this one unchurched child, then, to grow his kingdom exponentially. Imagine the consequences if child evangelism efforts hadn’t reached that seven-year-old. While it’s quite possible Wright would have become saved at some other time in her life, it is likely she wouldn’t have worked for the Lord in the same way. Instead of growing exponentially through her work, the Body of Christ might have lagged exponentially instead.
And when contemplating the Body of Christ it does seem reasonable that God would be pleased to call people into the Body at a young age since this gives them the maximum number of years to do the work of Christ. A person who is saved at 45 might have 25 years to do the work of Christ, and that would be after much discipleship and sanctification to undo the toll of a life of sin. A child who is saved, on the other hand, might have three times as many years to work in the Body and wouldn’t have a life of sin to unlearn. The words of the great English preacher Charles H. Spurgeon, a renowned advocate for child evangelism, ring true on this point.
“A child of five, if properly instructed, can savingly believe as well as an adult. My conviction is that our converts from among the children are among the best that we have. I should judge them to have been more numerously genuine than any other class, more constant, and in the long run, more solid.”
How about Grace Tan. She grew up in Hong Kong, and despite have anti-Christian parents was saved at age 10. She too has grown to become a missionary trainer and has equipped hundreds of missionaries to serve the Lord in the Asia-Pacific region of the globe.
As for brain washing this anit-child evangelism philosophy is largely based on secular research by developmental psychologists like Sigmund Freud, Jean Piaget, Lawrence Kohlberg, Erik Erickson and others. These psychoanalysts have developed various but similar theories on child development outlining at what ages different parts of the brain develop. As Christian leaders have sought degrees from seminaries and elsewhere these secular theories have shaped teachers at these institutions and affected how those seminaries look at child evangelism. While this “psychological” theory of child evangelism has no basis in scripture it is subtly appealing based on worldly knowledge. The work of these psychoanalysts indicates that children don’t begin to think in concrete or literal terms until age 7 or 8. Beyond that, children don’t develop logical thinking or understand symbolism until about age 12. Based largely on this data some Christian leaders and others argue children shouldn’t be evangelized until around age 12, when they can reason, understand logic and grasp symbolism. Without such intellectual tools the child cannot make a decision for Christ.
Of course, symbolism, logic and reason are all what might be called human intelligence. It should be remembered that salvation comes not by what a person knows but what a person believes (Acts 16:31). A person might be filled with head knowledge about Jesus, God and the Bible but lack the key ingredient of faith. Remember, Christ said adults must become like children to be saved. Adults, then, need to overcome the obstacles of reason, logic and the whole of adult intelligence to get back to the place of a child where reason and logic don’t interfere with saving faith.
To further refute the psychological theory, it would be well to fight science with science. Others in the field of psychoanalysis and anthropology offer ample evidence to show that very young children can savingly believe in God. Secular psychoanalyst Ana-Maria Rizzuto studied how children knew God in their lives. For her book The Birth of the Living God: A Psychoanalytic Study she studied many children, including a daughter of militant atheists. At age 7 the girl locked herself in her room – she was scared her parents would find her – and prayed on her knees for a long while. She prayed “please let there be a God.” Here the young girl knew she was committing a great disobedience to her parents but could not resist the desire to call out to God in faith. In much more of Rizzuto’s work, there is clear evidence that very young children have a deep desire for faith and actually believe in God. In fact, Rizzuto’s study led her to conclude that children become conscious of God between the age of two and three. Other psychoanalysts/anthropologists have offered similar evidence.
Secular psychoanalyst and anthropologist Robert Coles studied children in many different cultures and countries, focusing on kids as young as 8. One child told Coles about her relationship with Jesus:

"When I pray to Him, I thank Him for coming here, and I tell Him I look forward a lot to seeing Him . . . When I get to Heaven . . . I wonder what He’ll say to us! . . . I think He’ll smile, though. My mom says you should think of Jesus as your best friend . . . He’s not like us . . . He’s God."

Here Mary has her theology right, she knows Jesus is God. She considers Jesus her best friend and looks forward to seeing Him. While much of Mary’s theology – whether she knows about the cross, sin and the resurrection – isn’t presented, it seems likely that, given what we are told, she believes in Jesus. Another young girl, this one a poor, uneducated Brazilian child with an ailing mother told Coles about her relationship with Jesus.

"When I leave [the shack where she lived] to go on a walks and tell Him what’s on my mind, He doesn’t give me the time of day. If I shout, He shuts up. If I tell Him how much I love Him, He won’t blink – no sounds. But if I’m really in low spirits and not thinking of Him – thinking of myself and worrying what will happen to us, what will happen next to us – it’s then that He takes me by surprise, completely. I hear Him and He’ll say, ‘Margarita, you are looking too far ahead. First, try to get to the evening, the sunset; then try to get to the morning, the sunrise.’ When I hear Him, I feel calmer."

Margarita gives an awesome description of her prayer life and personal relationship with Jesus. Many adults would likely have similar testimonies of Jesus speaking to them. And the way Jesus responds to her seems like something Jesus would say. Compare what Jesus says to Margarita with what Jesus says in the Bible in Matthew 6.

"Do not worry then, saying ‘What will we eat?’ or “What will we drink?’ or ‘What will we wear for clothing?’ For the Gentiles eagerly seek all these things; for your heavenly Father knows that you need all these things. But seek first His kingdom and His righteousness, and all these things will be added to you. So do not worry about tomorrow; for tomorrow will care for itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own."

If you're not worn out yet consider the importance that Jesus placed on kids, evidenced best in Matthew 18:3-6, but solidified in Mark 10:13-16. Here Jesus was teaching adults and people began to bring their children (Greek: paidión, a child 7 and younger) to him that he might bless them. Famously, the disciples rebuked the people, apparently feeling that Jesus was too busy with important adult matters to be bothered with children. Notice Jesus’ classic reaction – one of intense negativity. “When Jesus saw this he was indignant.” The Greek word for indignant here is aganakteo. The word indicates a shocking disgust or anger. Vine’s Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words says aganakteo is “to grieve, primarily meant to feel a violent irritation, physically.” It’s the sort of anger born from somebody doing something so unconscionable or stupid that the angry party simply cannot believe someone could be so cruel, mean or ignorant that they would commit the offense. It’s probably a similar feeling most Americans had on the morning of 9-11.
The only other time the Bible records Jesus being indignant in this way is in Mark 3:5 when the Pharisees rebuked Him in their hearts for wanting to heal a man’s crippled hand on the Sabbath. Jesus was “grieved at their hardness of heart.” The Greek word translated “grieved” here is similar in meaning to aganakteo. Here Jesus was shocked that the Pharisees could be so hard-hearted that they would not rejoice that a man was healed, even if it was on the Sabbath. In the same way, Jesus was shocked to despair that His own disciples would be so hard-hearted that they would forbid young children from coming to Him. Those that argue against child evangelism should consider Jesus’ reaction here and take stock that they – like the disciples – don’t forbid their young children from coming to Christ. In fact, Jesus is very specific, warning “do not hinder them” from coming to Him.
Instead of keeping children away, the Lord welcomed them and noted “the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.” Heaven belongs to those who humble themselves as children and can accept Christ with child-like faith. Note the Lord didn’t say Heaven belongs to all children, but rather “such as these.” And Jesus welcomed the children and blessed them. If Christians are to be like Christ they must similarly not hinder children from coming to Him.

Considering the research from secular scientists working with young children, it would be difficult to argue that children are not mentally developed enough to have a personal relationship with Jesus and wholeheartedly believe in Him. Given both the secular and biblical evidences for rejecting the psychological philosophy of child evangelism it seems this pattern of thinking should be removed from the Church at all costs. In its stead – and in the stead of similarly flawed philosophies that children are too young to come to Christ – should be a philosophy of evangelizing kids as early as possible to see them won to the Lord and placed in a lifetime of service for His Kingdom.