PDA

View Full Version : "unintelligent design"



jimmybob479
February 21st 2006, 10:20 PM
I saw a magazine that had this title - I never read it since I was taking a test but I googled that and came up with a site that reminded me of something I wanted to post about a long time ago. The argument usually goes as follows: If God is intelligent, why are there so many extinct species? For a more precise quote of the typical thing I've heard, here is a direct quote from an article published:

"The fossil record shows that 23 different elephantlike species, including woolly mammoths, have arisen and died out during the past 5 million years, victims of an inability to adapt to changing conditions. Only Asian and African elephants remain. If an all-knowing designer was responsible for that work, [biologist Kenneth] Miller said to applause, 'it's distinctly substandard, because nearly every one became extinct. If you want to accept intelligent design, you'd damn well better account for' the numerous examples of failed species."

I havent read through the plethora of information in this section of the forums, so maybe someone has already asked something similar to this...

How would you respond?
(note: I'm not entirely decided myself on the issue of creation. I'm leaning towards OEC but am open to the fact that many true believers hold to theistic evolution and such. I do not believe it effects the core essentials of Christianity.)

One Bad Pig
February 22nd 2006, 06:12 PM
I don't think God created every single species we have today, but rather each kind. Each kind would have produced any number of species, some of which may have died out due to climate changes and other factors. The Flood would also have culled many species. Another thing that the critics overlook is the Fall of man, and how that impacted God's heretofore perfect creation.

jason
February 22nd 2006, 06:52 PM
I wonder why Miller as a bioligist thinks he is qualified to make comments on theology ? Worse yet, I bet he was talking as a "Scientist" about the question of ID, so why is a "scientist" talking about theology ?

Jason

jimmybob479
March 3rd 2006, 09:18 PM
I wonder why Miller as a bioligist thinks he is qualified to make comments on theology ? Worse yet, I bet he was talking as a "Scientist" about the question of ID, so why is a "scientist" talking about theology ?

Jason
Someone actually linked to the article on a news site which i was referring to, maybe it will give more insight to what I was talkign about, here it is:

http://www.discover.com/issues/mar-06/cover