OK, so when our military is involved in an operation, and there is "collateral damage", the liberals scream bloody murder. So launched a whole class of "smart bombs" and missiles, to hit specific targets while doing as little collateral damage as possible.
Why, then, when the liberals take on something like healthcare, does the collateral damage have to be so catastrophic.
This reminds me of the "bread ministry" we had at one Church. They had an old blue van that was constantly breaking down, it had horrible gas mileage, and they used this to collect "day old bread" from the local grocery stores. They would bring the bread to our fellowship hall, and every Tuesday morning, it was "bread day", where people from the community could come in and fight and crawl all over each other to get the best muffins, cakes, pastries, breads, pies, etc.
I had our finance guy do a quick calculation of how much this "ministry" was costing us, and we determined that we could FEDEX a loaf of bread to TEN TIMES as many people as we were "serving", and be way ahead of the game.
What problem has the government "solved" that doesn't entail massive collateral damage?
Wouldn't it have been cheaper just to provide FREE MEDICAL CARE to the poor? Heck, the cost of the WEBSITE ALONE would go along way toward helping poor people.
(deep breath)
Why couldn't the healthcare "solution" be more of a "surgical strike" than a nuclear war?
OK, that's my rant for today.
Why, then, when the liberals take on something like healthcare, does the collateral damage have to be so catastrophic.
This reminds me of the "bread ministry" we had at one Church. They had an old blue van that was constantly breaking down, it had horrible gas mileage, and they used this to collect "day old bread" from the local grocery stores. They would bring the bread to our fellowship hall, and every Tuesday morning, it was "bread day", where people from the community could come in and fight and crawl all over each other to get the best muffins, cakes, pastries, breads, pies, etc.
I had our finance guy do a quick calculation of how much this "ministry" was costing us, and we determined that we could FEDEX a loaf of bread to TEN TIMES as many people as we were "serving", and be way ahead of the game.
What problem has the government "solved" that doesn't entail massive collateral damage?
Wouldn't it have been cheaper just to provide FREE MEDICAL CARE to the poor? Heck, the cost of the WEBSITE ALONE would go along way toward helping poor people.
(deep breath)
Why couldn't the healthcare "solution" be more of a "surgical strike" than a nuclear war?
OK, that's my rant for today.
Comment