Genesius
July 29th 2006, 10:17 AM
I've read that the early church essentially believed that the forgiveness of sins was for sins committed up until the point of baptism.
There seems to be evidence of a strong debate surrounding this issue within the church in the mid third century.
Emperor Decius had begun persecuting Christians for not sacrificing to the Roman Gods. Those Christians who did not 'betray' their confession, were of course martyred. A real problem arose, obviously, after the persecution ended and many 'betrayers' wanted to re-join the church.
There seems to be some evidence that the Bishop of Rome, Callistus was willing to forgive many sins, to allow believers back into the church. This notion of continual forgiveness of sins seems to be hotly debated in the early church, but I'm not sure if it was strictly between the Montanists and the Orthodoxy.
Note that apostasy was certainly not the only unforgiveable sin, adultery also seemed unforgiveable.
This doctrine seems to be crucial to the Christian faith. Is anyone else suprised that at this point --~200AD-- it was still a hotly contested debate?
Is this still legitimately debated among the church today?
If any insight, please share.
There seems to be evidence of a strong debate surrounding this issue within the church in the mid third century.
Emperor Decius had begun persecuting Christians for not sacrificing to the Roman Gods. Those Christians who did not 'betray' their confession, were of course martyred. A real problem arose, obviously, after the persecution ended and many 'betrayers' wanted to re-join the church.
There seems to be some evidence that the Bishop of Rome, Callistus was willing to forgive many sins, to allow believers back into the church. This notion of continual forgiveness of sins seems to be hotly debated in the early church, but I'm not sure if it was strictly between the Montanists and the Orthodoxy.
Note that apostasy was certainly not the only unforgiveable sin, adultery also seemed unforgiveable.
This doctrine seems to be crucial to the Christian faith. Is anyone else suprised that at this point --~200AD-- it was still a hotly contested debate?
Is this still legitimately debated among the church today?
If any insight, please share.