You don't want to attend a gay marriage? That's your right.
Your church doesn't want to officiate at a gay marriage? That's your right.
You don't want to socialize with a gay couple? That's your right.
You want to speak out against homosexuality or gay marriage? That's your right.
You want to believe homosexuality is sinful? That's your right.
Any of the above I would support, would help defend, would contribute to your legal defense if sued, and would protest if you faced legal sanction. However, your right to do these things does not defend you from the social response (including disagreement). If you get called a bigot because you do the above things, well, that's pretty much your problem.
You want to impose your views on others via secular law? I oppose this.
Is that really so hard to understand? Or am I still "repressing" your rights ... at least in your views?
Your church doesn't want to officiate at a gay marriage? That's your right.
You don't want to socialize with a gay couple? That's your right.
You want to speak out against homosexuality or gay marriage? That's your right.
You want to believe homosexuality is sinful? That's your right.
Any of the above I would support, would help defend, would contribute to your legal defense if sued, and would protest if you faced legal sanction. However, your right to do these things does not defend you from the social response (including disagreement). If you get called a bigot because you do the above things, well, that's pretty much your problem.
You want to impose your views on others via secular law? I oppose this.
Is that really so hard to understand? Or am I still "repressing" your rights ... at least in your views?
Comment