Making Judgments About The Supreme Court’s Latest Decision About Abortion

[dizzle]

I just about lost it reading Linda P. Campbell’s syndicated column (www.realcities.com/mld/dfw/news/columnists/linda_campbell/17137857/17137857.htm) about the Supreme Court’s abortion decision not being simple or neat. Let me take some of her points one by one, as she explains her abhorrence of any controls over any abortion, in addition to the barbaric sucking out of a baby’s brain after the head emerges from the birth canal (partial birth abortion).

****

Abortions out of shame, embarrassment, or inconvenience are a horrible, despicable disaster. An Abortion to save the life of the mother is self-defense. There. I dared to judge.

http://www.drlaura.com/blog/2007/05/01/making-judgments-about-the-supreme-courts-latest-decision-about-abortion/

[Sheepdog]

"How far do we want to let lawmakers and zealots reach into our most personal and private decisions when they haven’t a clue about what’s best for us?”

I wonder if this writer has, or would, talk a person out of committing suicide. (That would be, of course, a personal and private decision, and what right does she have being a "zealot" about end of life matters?)