TheologyWeb News - The Social World of the Bible - Honor and Shame, Part I

  • The Social World of the Bible - Honor and Shame, Part I

    .
    .
    .

    Honor and Shame, Part I
    What it is and why it's important


    When it comes to understanding how almost 100% of the ancient world and 70% of the present population1 think, and value, and view the world, one of the most integral and core values to start investigating is the concept of honor and shame. Honor and shame are so interwoven into the fabric of most of the world's cultures, including those shown in the Bible, that to stay ignorant of or simply to ignore it would be a fatal detriment to one's understanding of Scripture.

    Honor was so important that Greek historian and philosopher, Xenophon, in his work Hiero made it the sole distinction between humanity and the lower animals, and between a man and a mere human being2:

    Yes, Hiero, and herein precisely lies the difference between a man and other animals, in this outstretching after honour. Since, it would seem, all living creatures alike take pleasure in meats and drinks, in sleep and sexual joys. Only the love of honour is implanted neither in unreasoning brutes nor universally in man. But they in whose hearts the passion for honour and fair fame has fallen like a seed, these unmistakably are separated most widely from the brutes. These may claim to be called men, not human beings merely.
    David deSilva, a professor of the New Testament at Ashland Theological Seminary, lists several other examples of the value of honor as seen through ancient eyes. Firstly, Seneca, a Roman statesmen and philosopher, affirmed honor as a core value when he wrote, "The one firm conviction from which we move to the proof of other points is this: that which is honorable is held dear for no other reason than because it is honorable." Aristotle in Nichomachaen Ethics believed there were two reasons why a person would choose to undertake an action: either for honor or for pleasure. Isocrates taught his students to persue honor even over one's personal safety.3

    Examples of honor and shame within the Bible will be explored at a later time. The ubiquitous nature, however, of honor and shame remains uncontested by any scholar in the field. So what is honor? What is shame? Why is it so important to most people that has ever lived?

    The general idea behind honor isn't so hard to understand. In a nutshell, honor is "basically a claim to worth that is socially acknowledged."4 There is no convenient analog to honor in our own culture, however we might think of honor as "social credit", just as we might have a line of credit with a banking institution. This claim of worth (or, if you will, reputation) determines how well society at large values a person's contribution towards the greater good and consequently determines the role a person plays in it, be it a farmer or a member of the nobility. The antonym of honor is "shame", which means a lowering of a person's worth or reputation as acknowledged by society. You must notice the later part of this sentence - as acknowledged by society. This is crucial for one can not legitimately make a claim of honor that his or her society does not recognize and doing so would, in fact, accrue shame upon an individual. In other words, no peasant can claim to have the worth of a king and enjoy the benefits of it, nor can a person be falsely modest and claim to be of lower worth (not that the latter would have occurred frequently....).

    So why does honor play such a large role in these cultures? It's because these cultures are what anthropologist term a collectivist society. In the western world, such as America, most culture's are individualistic - meaning, as Daniel Bell puts it, "the fundamental assumption of modernity, the thread that has run through Western civilization since the sixteenth century, is that the social unit of society is not the group, the guild, the tribe, or the city, but the person."5. This runs counter to a collectivist society wherein a person always strives to achieve what is best for his or her in-group (more on that later) or society as a whole. This means that an individuals personal desires get subordinated to that of the collective group. As Malina puts it, "In collectivist cultures most people's social behavior is largely determined by group goals that require the pursuit of achievements that improve the position of the group. The defining attributes of collectivistic cultures are family integrity, solidarity, and keeping the primary in-group in 'good health'."6

    In the ancient world, civilizations were always on the brink of collapse and chaos. Scarcity of resources meant that a society could afford no dead-weight. Everybody must play their part to ensure their mutual survival or they would simply die. This might be hard to understand to an American living with a fully-stocked grocery section of a Wal-mart and an up-to-date hospital staffed with knowledgeable doctors and nurses down the street; but the fact of the matter is that the ancient world was tough to live in. The average life expectancy was only around 35 years! Therefore, naturally, groups came to value people who contributed to society in a positive way and thereby gave birth to honor as a core value.7

    Next time, we'll dive deeper into understanding honor and shame and explore how one can accrue honor or shame. Later, we'll investigate what's considered honorable given a person's status in life (male and female, young and old, wealthy, and so on) and the role honor and shame plays in the Bible.

    Citations

    1. Bruce Malina and Richard Rohrbaugh, ed., The Social Sciences and New Testament Interpretation, (Massachusetts: Baker Academic, 1996), 44, 46. NOTE: We would do well to remember this lest we think the concept odd or quaint. The fact is, us Westerners are the oddballs to the majority of the world and they view us as strange. And, to a certain extent, we are inferior for our lack of a honor-shame paradigm.
    2. Xenophon, Hiero. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1175/1175-h/1175-h.htm
    3. David A. deSilva, Honor, Patronage, Kinship & Purity: Unlocking New Testament Culture (Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP Academic, 2000), 23-24
    4. Bruce J. Malina, The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology, 3rd ed. (Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001), 29.
    5. Daniel Bell, The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. (New York: Basic Books, 1976). 16.
    6. Bruce Malina and Richard Rohrbaugh. 47.
    7. David deSilva. 35.
    This article was originally published in blog: The Social World of the Bible - Honor and Shame, Part I started by Manwë Súlimo
    Comments 55 Comments
    1. apophenia's Avatar
      apophenia -
      Yes, impeccable timing. Coinciding with the conviction of Hamed and Mohammad Shafia and Mohammad's wife Tooba in the honor killing of four innocent women. No, it's not quaint at all. By all means, let's all kill our children if we disagree with them. What was that commandment again? Honor thy father and mother... or we'll stone you to death.
    1. Manwë Súlimo's Avatar
      Manwë Súlimo -
      Quote Originally posted by apophenia View Post
      Yes, impeccable timing. Coinciding with the conviction of Hamed and Mohammad Shafia and Mohammad's wife Tooba in the honor killing of four innocent women. No, it's not quaint at all. By all means, let's all kill our children if we disagree with them. What was that commandment again? Honor thy father and mother... or we'll stone you to death.
      Okay, I want you to try this again; but this time in comprehensible English. What point are you trying to make?
    1. fm93's Avatar
      fm93 -
      Are you going to do a post on the issue of when the Western paradigm shifted? I've read that Southern culture in the 1700s and perhaps into the 1800s was honor-based, and that honor cultures can still spring up in places like the inner-city "ghetto" areas (think of rap battles as riposte challenges). I'd like to discover when and how it changed to an individualistic, guilt-based culture.
    1. Manwë Súlimo's Avatar
      Manwë Súlimo -
      Quote Originally posted by fm93 View Post
      Are you going to do a post on the issue of when the Western paradigm shifted? I've read that Southern culture in the 1700s and perhaps into the 1800s was honor-based, and that honor cultures can still spring up in places like the inner-city "ghetto" areas (think of rap battles as riposte challenges). I'd like to discover when and how it changed to an individualistic, guilt-based culture.
      Not any time soon as I have read anything that talked about it - though an educated guess would be sometime around the Industrial Revolution. Honor is central to groups where everyone has to depend on everyone else for their livelihood, but an abundance of resources means less reasons to maintain strong interdependent networks which in turn leads one into individualism and so on.
    1. apophenia's Avatar
      apophenia -

      Thailand attempt to shame police officers backfires

      Quote Originally posted by Wikipedia View Post
      More recently, in 2007, the Bangkok, Thailand police switched to punitive pink armbands adorned with the cute Hello Kitty cartoon character when the tartan armbands that had been intended to be worn as a badge of shame for minor infractions were instead treated as collectibles by offending officers forced to wear them, creating a perverse incentive.


      NYTimes: Cute Kitty Is Pink Badge of Shame in Bangkok

    1. Manwë Súlimo's Avatar
      Manwë Súlimo -
      No, I told you to make a point and you haven't. You're still rambling. Give me an argument with a definite conclusion - what's the point you're trying to make about honor and shame in the biblical world? This time when you answer, leave out Hello Kitty....
    1. fm93's Avatar
      fm93 -
      Quote Originally posted by Manwë Súlimo View Post
      This time when you answer, leave out Hello Kitty....
      That's hardly a fair thing to demand. He has to get his arguments from somewhere.
    1. fm93's Avatar
      fm93 -
      Quote Originally posted by Manwë Súlimo View Post
      Not any time soon as I have read anything that talked about it - though an educated guess would be sometime around the Industrial Revolution. Honor is central to groups where everyone has to depend on everyone else for their livelihood, but an abundance of resources means less reasons to maintain strong interdependent networks which in turn leads one into individualism and so on.
      I see. Yeah, that makes sense, given the data. Thanks.
    1. BronzeArcher's Avatar
      BronzeArcher -
      Quote Originally posted by fm93 View Post
      Are you going to do a post on the issue of when the Western paradigm shifted? I've read that Southern culture in the 1700s and perhaps into the 1800s was honor-based, and that honor cultures can still spring up in places like the inner-city "ghetto" areas (think of rap battles as riposte challenges). I'd like to discover when and how it changed to an individualistic, guilt-based culture.
      It would be with the Indy Rev as Manwë said. The development of the industrial West, rise of psychology, and thinking of people as individuals in the individualisic sense--

      Quote Originally posted by Geertz View Post
      as a bounded, unique, more or less intergrated motivational and cognitive universe, a dynamic center of awareness, emotion, judgment, and action organized into a distinctive whole and set contrastively both against other such wholes and against a social and natural background
      happens in the same timeframe that one might say they were dialectical processes. Psychology as an academic discipline began ~1870 with Wilhelm Wundt. In terms of the cultural processes that encourage more individualist behavior, urbanization, new management philosophies, and capitalist thinking were some of the big ones. If a hiring process completely detached from familial ties becomes normalized, if worker evaluation happens on an individual basis and performance is ultimate, if individual enterprise and profit is lauded as inherently good, then we have the modern West. (More or less.) Some of the anthropology on PNG describes how previously familial-based labor systems were radically affected by a mining company that used Western hiring practices; indigenous folk soon found out that having a cousin show up to do the work (hey, your kin formed a relationship with the guy... right?) was unacceptable.

      As for subcultures that models of h-s are more useful for, well, I would look at how their minority status was constructed by themselves and the wider culture, as well as the kind of economic opportunities they had. There are a lot of processes that can encourage the maintenance of strong in-group values, like stigma, "oppression," and the things that follow from it, like being barred from jobs that pay a living wage or education. These are processes of exclusion and othering which not only slow/prevent assimilation but make it socially and economically difficult for those who want to assimilate.

      I don't know much black history in America, but I do know that the construction of "Southern culture" took quite a lot of black culture and repackaged it as racially unmarked (i.e., white).

      Hope this helps.
    1. BronzeArcher's Avatar
      BronzeArcher -
      I am wondering if you think Manwë is, by describing cultural trajectories in the ancient Mediterranean, at the same time giving his moral approval to honor and shame cultures. Do you?

      It would certainly be a mistake for Christians to give wholehearted approval to a culture simply because their saints and prophets hailed from them.
    1. Manwë Súlimo's Avatar
      Manwë Súlimo -
      Quote Originally posted by BronzeArcher View Post
      I am wondering if you think Manwë is, by describing cultural trajectories in the ancient Mediterranean, at the same time giving his moral approval to honor and shame cultures. Do you?

      It would certainly be a mistake for Christians to give wholehearted approval to a culture simply because their saints and prophets hailed from them.
      Nothing constituted of human beings is wholly good....or bad. I think the Biblical cultural paradigm has a lot to recommend it - some aspects I would consider superior to my own - and some that is less than good, if not evil (and some of that was confronted by Jesus Himself). But good or bad, this is all beside the point. As someone that would like to be intellectually honest and one that's a historian in training, I have to try to understand an event in its proper context so that means I have to understand things like honor and shame.
    1. fm93's Avatar
      fm93 -
      Quote Originally posted by BronzeArcher View Post
      I am wondering if you think Manwë is, by describing cultural trajectories in the ancient Mediterranean, at the same time giving his moral approval to honor and shame cultures. Do you?

      It would certainly be a mistake for Christians to give wholehearted approval to a culture simply because their saints and prophets hailed from them.
      Well, I certainly don't think the ancient culture was perfect--some of the ways in which they expressed and sought honor were undoubtedly misguided--but I don't see anything inherently wrong with the ideals of honor and shame. Westerners have knee-jerk reactions to things like honor-killings, but such things are problematic mainly because they've been stripped of their context--we no longer live in a society that was at constant threat of descending into chaos. So the fact that honor-killings still occur in isn't really an innate problem of honor itself.

      Where some members of honor-shame cultures went wrong, IMO, was in spending so much energy seeking honor from and ascribing honor to men that they neglected to do so to and for God.
    1. BronzeArcher's Avatar
      BronzeArcher -
      Quote Originally posted by Manwë Súlimo View Post
      Nothing constituted of human beings is wholly good....or bad. I think the Biblical cultural paradigm has a lot to recommend it - some aspects I would consider superior to my own - and some that is less than good, if not evil (and some of that was confronted by Jesus Himself). But good or bad, this is all beside the point. As someone that would like to be intellectually honest and one that's a historian in training, I have to try to understand an event in its proper context so that means I have to understand things like honor and shame.
      Bah, I was quoting one of apophenia's posts since I was responding to him. His responses would make more sense if he was attacking what he thought was an implicit approval of the culture.
    1. ThePuppyTurtle's Avatar
      ThePuppyTurtle -
      It is a fact that everyone before 2000 years ago and 70% of the world today reject Christianity.
    1. Manwë Súlimo's Avatar
      Manwë Súlimo -
      Quote Originally posted by ThePuppyTurtle View Post
      It is a fact that everyone before 2000 years ago and 70% of the world today reject Christianity.
      Is this supposed to be an argument or just your inane fartings that you try to pass off as profound?
    1. Chrawnus's Avatar
      Chrawnus -
      Quote Originally posted by ThePuppyTurtle View Post
      It is a fact that everyone before 2000 years ago and 70% of the world today reject Christianity.
      That everyone before 2000 years ago rejected Christianity implies that they knew that there would be something like it in the first place. Unless they could look into the future I would hardly say that the appropriate word is "reject".
    1. fm93's Avatar
      fm93 -
      Quote Originally posted by ThePuppyTurtle View Post
      It is a fact that everyone before 2000 years ago and 70% of the world today reject Christianity.
      Is this supposed to be a subtle attempt to argue that the honor-shame paradigm is incompatible with Christianity? Too bad the facts still stand against you. You've still provided no argument or evidence to show that Christianity isn't founded on the paradigm. In fact, you kind of ran away from the "Questions about Patron/Client Relationships" thread when pressed to do so.

      Also, it's a fact that Christianity is rapidly declining in the guilt-cultured West and rapidly spreading in the honor-cultured East.
    1. Manwë Súlimo's Avatar
      Manwë Súlimo -
      Quote Originally posted by fm93 View Post
      Are you going to do a post on the issue of when the Western paradigm shifted? I've read that Southern culture in the 1700s and perhaps into the 1800s was honor-based, and that honor cultures can still spring up in places like the inner-city "ghetto" areas (think of rap battles as riposte challenges). I'd like to discover when and how it changed to an individualistic, guilt-based culture.
      Heh, in my reading, I came across the probable answer. It does appear to be due to the Industrial Revolution, or at least it was one of the prime movers.
    1. Teallaura's Avatar
      Teallaura -
      Quote Originally posted by MS View Post
      nor can a person be falsely modest and claim to be of lower worth (not that the latter would have occurred frequently....).
      Um, MS, I don't think this is actually true. My own knowledge is very limited, but what I've been reading about Japan, especially Modern Japan, the use of false modesty to curry honor is somewhat common. The analog is when someone self-effaces in order to gain sympathy. Evidentally, false modesty or even out right self-effacement will work much the same way in their society.

      Guest: "Oh, that was a wonderful meal!"
      Hostess: "Oh, no, no, you're too kind. The beans were burnt. I'm a terrible cook."
      Guest: "No, no, you are a wonderful cook. The beans were excellent." Yada yada yada...
    1. fm93's Avatar
      fm93 -
      Teal is right. I somehow missed that part when I was reading earlier. Asian parents in particular will often "turn down" compliments, so to speak, by making deprecating statements like in the example. Also, if an outsider compliments on a child's beauty or grades, the parent will often with respond with something like "No, no, she has too much fat on her" or "Oh, no, she is lazy and needs to work harder." The goal is to elicit a response of reassurance that reinforces their honor status. On a somewhat similar note, they'll usually fight for the opportunity to pay the bill at social gatherings at restaurants. Most parents are stingy, so they don't actually want to pay--it's all just for show to get more honor.

      It's possible, of course, that this is a late development or a predominantly Asian construct.
  • Recent Articles

    GPiper

    Glory Seed Devotional 05/24/2013



    A Glory Seed Devotional
    There is NO bad time or place to worship God

    Who said you needed to be in church sitting in a formal Worship Service to worship God? I didn’t, neither did you! So I spent the first hour of my day worshipping God. And while your day has already begun there’s no better time than right now to spending ten minutes or so worshipping God. I’ve included a couple of songs and a scripture to help you.

    First a song sung by Josh Turner titled “The Long Black Train”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyRZTAmcW7c

    Psalms 146:1-10 MSG: “Hallelujah! O my soul, praise GOD! All my life long I'll praise GOD, singing songs to my God as long as I live. Don't put your life... read more
    GPiper Today, 08:13 AM
    GPiper

    NSM Evotional 05/23/2013



    A Glory Seed Devotional
    When what you do is not enough

    “The faithful love of the LORD never ends! His mercies never cease. Great is His faithfulness; His mercies begin afresh each morning. I say to myself, "The LORD is my inheritance; therefore, I will hope in Him!" The LORD is good to those who depend on Him, to those who search for Him. So it is good to wait quietly for salvation from the LORD.” (Lamentations 3:22-26 NLT, emphasis mine)

    Have you ever did something then afterwards had the “gut wrenching” feeling that it wasn’t enough? Remember the story of the young rich man who walked away from Jesus because he couldn’t do as Jesus had asked him? Remember Peter’s remarks about... read more
    GPiper Yesterday, 08:34 AM
    ApologiaPhoenix

    Passed On What I Received

    Is there an authentic tradition of an earthly Jesus?

    The link can be found here

    The text is as follows:

    Did Paul receive a creed from another, or was it something else? Let's talk about it on Deeper Waters.

    The point has been argued that when Paul says he passed on what he received in 1 Cor. 15, that that is the language that is used in Galatians 1 and Galatians 1 refers to a divine revelation. This leads us to the conclusion that Paul is not passing a creed that he has received, but sharing a revelation he has had of a divine and heavenly Jesus that later got turned into an earthly one.

    Yes. That really is what is being argued.

    So what are we to make... read more
    ApologiaPhoenix May 22nd 2013, 12:18 PM
    GPiper

    NSM Evotional 05/22/2013



    A Glory Seed Devotional
    Moses, you, and the un-consumable burning bush

    One day Moses was tending the flock of his father-in-law, Jethro, the priest of Midian. He led the flock far into the wilderness and came to Sinai, the mountain of God. There the angel of the LORD appeared to him in a blazing fire from the middle of a bush. Moses stared in amazement. Though the bush was engulfed in flames, it didn't burn up. "This is amazing," Moses said to himself. "Why isn't that bush burning up? I must go see it." When the LORD saw Moses coming to take a closer look, God called to him from the middle of the bush, "Moses! Moses!" "Here I am!" Moses replied. "Do not come... read more
    GPiper May 22nd 2013, 08:00 AM
    ApologiaPhoenix

    The Brother of the Lord

    Does this show the existence of Jesus?

    The link can be found here

    The text is as follows:

    Is James really a brother to a historical figure? Let's talk about it on Deeper Waters.

    Yesterday, I wrote about the problem of internet atheists and gave the Christ-myth as an example. I can anticipate that someone will ask me about the claims of Richard Carrier. I figured it would be good to look at some of the claims that are made against Jesus being a real historical figure and for a start, thought that I'd look at the passage that talks about James being the brother of the Lord.

    Now if James is a brother to someone, it would be self-evident that that person either now exists... read more
    ApologiaPhoenix May 21st 2013, 10:21 AM
    GPiper

    NSM Evotional 05/21/2013



    A Glory Seed Devotional
    A strong and trustworthy anchor for your soul

    This morning in my prayer journal I wrote, “LORD, my imagination is filled with junk like that. I am struggling hard against the pull of “powers and principalities of this world” but they are (at least right now) becoming stronger and stronger. I can’t pull myself up and as hard as I try I cannot envision any hope I know the songs they are singing are not right but they seem so right. Please Father God drown them out with your songs of HOPE and PEACE. PLEASE!”

    I share those words with you not to get your sympathy but to grab your attention not to me or my situation nor to what I wrote I want you to focus on the ever present... read more
    GPiper May 21st 2013, 08:19 AM
    ApologiaPhoenix

    Why I Ignore Most Internet Atheists

    Including a number on here.

    The link can be found here

    The text is as follows:

    Why is it sometimes best to just not bother? Let's talk about it on Deeper Waters.

    Before leaping into the meat of this post, let's make a few clarifications.

    No. Not every atheist is an internet atheist. I refer to a general type of person by this. If you are on the internet and an atheist and are highly informed and can show it and have done your homework on what you and I both believe, then I do not consider you an internet atheist.

    Yes. I realize too many Christians are just as ignorant. If you think I've been silent on this matter, then you haven't been reading my blog... read more
    ApologiaPhoenix May 20th 2013, 11:10 AM
    GPiper

    NSM Evotional 05/20/2013



    A Glory Seed Devotional
    Stay Vertical

    With my two artificial hips and extremely fragile femurs one of my greatest fears over the winter months is slipping and falling on ice and snow now that there is no more ice and snow I still fear falling in the yard or riding my bike. One of my favorite sayings throughout the year is “Stay Vertical!” In other words don’t fall!

    However, my fear of falling goes beyond physically falling and injuring myself it “falls” into my spiritual life as well. It was Paul who said, “We have all fallen short of the Glory of God.” In his letter to Titus he STRONGLY reminds us to stay “upright” (stay vertical) “in the present age” because just as in his days there... read more
    GPiper May 20th 2013, 08:39 AM