TheologyWeb News - The Social World of the Bible - Honor and Shame, Part I

  • The Social World of the Bible - Honor and Shame, Part I

    .
    .
    .

    Honor and Shame, Part I
    What it is and why it's important


    When it comes to understanding how almost 100% of the ancient world and 70% of the present population1 think, and value, and view the world, one of the most integral and core values to start investigating is the concept of honor and shame. Honor and shame are so interwoven into the fabric of most of the world's cultures, including those shown in the Bible, that to stay ignorant of or simply to ignore it would be a fatal detriment to one's understanding of Scripture.

    Honor was so important that Greek historian and philosopher, Xenophon, in his work Hiero made it the sole distinction between humanity and the lower animals, and between a man and a mere human being2:

    Yes, Hiero, and herein precisely lies the difference between a man and other animals, in this outstretching after honour. Since, it would seem, all living creatures alike take pleasure in meats and drinks, in sleep and sexual joys. Only the love of honour is implanted neither in unreasoning brutes nor universally in man. But they in whose hearts the passion for honour and fair fame has fallen like a seed, these unmistakably are separated most widely from the brutes. These may claim to be called men, not human beings merely.
    David deSilva, a professor of the New Testament at Ashland Theological Seminary, lists several other examples of the value of honor as seen through ancient eyes. Firstly, Seneca, a Roman statesmen and philosopher, affirmed honor as a core value when he wrote, "The one firm conviction from which we move to the proof of other points is this: that which is honorable is held dear for no other reason than because it is honorable." Aristotle in Nichomachaen Ethics believed there were two reasons why a person would choose to undertake an action: either for honor or for pleasure. Isocrates taught his students to persue honor even over one's personal safety.3

    Examples of honor and shame within the Bible will be explored at a later time. The ubiquitous nature, however, of honor and shame remains uncontested by any scholar in the field. So what is honor? What is shame? Why is it so important to most people that has ever lived?

    The general idea behind honor isn't so hard to understand. In a nutshell, honor is "basically a claim to worth that is socially acknowledged."4 There is no convenient analog to honor in our own culture, however we might think of honor as "social credit", just as we might have a line of credit with a banking institution. This claim of worth (or, if you will, reputation) determines how well society at large values a person's contribution towards the greater good and consequently determines the role a person plays in it, be it a farmer or a member of the nobility. The antonym of honor is "shame", which means a lowering of a person's worth or reputation as acknowledged by society. You must notice the later part of this sentence - as acknowledged by society. This is crucial for one can not legitimately make a claim of honor that his or her society does not recognize and doing so would, in fact, accrue shame upon an individual. In other words, no peasant can claim to have the worth of a king and enjoy the benefits of it, nor can a person be falsely modest and claim to be of lower worth (not that the latter would have occurred frequently....).

    So why does honor play such a large role in these cultures? It's because these cultures are what anthropologist term a collectivist society. In the western world, such as America, most culture's are individualistic - meaning, as Daniel Bell puts it, "the fundamental assumption of modernity, the thread that has run through Western civilization since the sixteenth century, is that the social unit of society is not the group, the guild, the tribe, or the city, but the person."5. This runs counter to a collectivist society wherein a person always strives to achieve what is best for his or her in-group (more on that later) or society as a whole. This means that an individuals personal desires get subordinated to that of the collective group. As Malina puts it, "In collectivist cultures most people's social behavior is largely determined by group goals that require the pursuit of achievements that improve the position of the group. The defining attributes of collectivistic cultures are family integrity, solidarity, and keeping the primary in-group in 'good health'."6

    In the ancient world, civilizations were always on the brink of collapse and chaos. Scarcity of resources meant that a society could afford no dead-weight. Everybody must play their part to ensure their mutual survival or they would simply die. This might be hard to understand to an American living with a fully-stocked grocery section of a Wal-mart and an up-to-date hospital staffed with knowledgeable doctors and nurses down the street; but the fact of the matter is that the ancient world was tough to live in. The average life expectancy was only around 35 years! Therefore, naturally, groups came to value people who contributed to society in a positive way and thereby gave birth to honor as a core value.7

    Next time, we'll dive deeper into understanding honor and shame and explore how one can accrue honor or shame. Later, we'll investigate what's considered honorable given a person's status in life (male and female, young and old, wealthy, and so on) and the role honor and shame plays in the Bible.

    Citations

    1. Bruce Malina and Richard Rohrbaugh, ed., The Social Sciences and New Testament Interpretation, (Massachusetts: Baker Academic, 1996), 44, 46. NOTE: We would do well to remember this lest we think the concept odd or quaint. The fact is, us Westerners are the oddballs to the majority of the world and they view us as strange. And, to a certain extent, we are inferior for our lack of a honor-shame paradigm.
    2. Xenophon, Hiero. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1175/1175-h/1175-h.htm
    3. David A. deSilva, Honor, Patronage, Kinship & Purity: Unlocking New Testament Culture (Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP Academic, 2000), 23-24
    4. Bruce J. Malina, The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology, 3rd ed. (Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001), 29.
    5. Daniel Bell, The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. (New York: Basic Books, 1976). 16.
    6. Bruce Malina and Richard Rohrbaugh. 47.
    7. David deSilva. 35.
    This article was originally published in blog: The Social World of the Bible - Honor and Shame, Part I started by Manwë Súlimo
    Comments 55 Comments
    1. David Hayward's Avatar
      David Hayward -
      Quote Originally posted by JonathanDJ View Post
      Jesus attacked the Shame/Honor paradigm throughout his ministry.
      I am sure others better qualified will soon tell you otherwise.

      Quote Originally posted by JonathanDJ View Post
      Matthew 5:39 39 But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.

      This famous verse has been borrowed by many pacifists. But it isn't a recommendation to pacifism. It is instructing the hearer to choose not to participate in Shame/Honor culture. Shame/Honor people are every bit as obsessed with themselves as we Westerners are. If someone attacked your honor (i.e. struck you on the cheek (a grave insult) you had to avenge that wrong to restore your honor)
      Sorry to quote Wikipedia, but it nicely says what I have often heard:

      "At the time of Jesus, striking someone deemed to be of a lower class with the back of the hand was used to assert authority and dominance. If the persecuted person "turned the other cheek," the discipliner was faced with a dilemma. The left hand was used for unclean purposes, so a back-hand strike on the opposite cheek would not be performed. The other alternative would be a slap with the open hand as a challenge or to punch the person, but this was seen as a statement of equality. Thus, by turning the other cheek the persecuted was in effect demanding equality."

      Seems very like honour-shame to me.

      Quote Originally posted by JonathanDJ View Post
      Jesus also attacked the collectivist mindset. Luke 15:1-7 4 "Suppose one of you has a hundred sheep and loses one of them. Does he not leave the ninety-nine in the open country and go after the lost sheep until he finds it? 5 And when he finds it, he joyfully puts it on his shoulders.

      And he winds it up with:

      7 I tell you that in the same way there will be more rejoicing in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who do not need to repent.
      The Lord is my shepherd, says Psalm 23, and Luke 15:1-7 expresses how eagerly and joyfully the Lord searches for and recieves back the repentant.

      The passage does NOT express the value of individualism or attack the collectivist mindset: the one lost sheep is being brought back into the hundred, the individual returned to the flock.

      Quote Originally posted by JonathanDJ View Post
      There are other examples. If you want them.
      Not examples like these.

      David
    1. Manwë Súlimo's Avatar
      Manwë Súlimo -
      Now that the forums have (hopefully) stopped having strokes, I'll respond more after work.
    1. Manwë Súlimo's Avatar
      Manwë Súlimo -
      Quote Originally posted by JonathanDJ View Post
      It is instructing the hearer to choose not to participate in Shame/Honor culture.
      Wrong. Turning the other cheek and giving your cloak in addition to your tunic and going two miles instead of one are deliberately overdone and exaggerated actions meant to shame your opponent. Its a non-violent tactic that forgoes blood feuds so common in honor-shame cultures but it's every bit infused with honor and shame.

      Jesus also attacked the collectivist mindset. Luke 15:1-7 4 "Suppose one of you has a hundred sheep and loses one of them. Does he not leave the ninety-nine in the open country and go after the lost sheep until he finds it? 5 And when he finds it, he joyfully puts it on his shoulders.
      And what would a shepherd do with a sheep after finding it? Forgo the other 99 and start a new "herd" of one sheep? Uh, no. It would be returned the the collective whole. And its not unthinkable that there would be a celebration as 1) the shepherd would no longer have to answer to the sheep owners for failing in his responsibility and 2) sheep are valuable resources.

      And he winds it up with:

      7 I tell you that in the same way there will be more rejoicing in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who do not need to repent.
      Yes, and? Should jailers hold daily celebrations for going another day without a jailbreak? The 99 are upholding the expected status quo.

      There are other examples. If you want them.
      As mentioned by David, please no more of these bad examples.

      You could really benefit from reading the rest of my blog series or reading publications from the Context Group where they and I saw explicit examples of Jesus not merely going along with the honor-shame paradigm but actively participating in it.
    1. Manwë Súlimo's Avatar
      Manwë Súlimo -
      Quote Originally posted by JonathanDJ View Post
      I wanted to add a comment. Shame/Honor is the obsession with pleasing people. It is obsession with being a part of the group.
      I'm sorry to see you're not obsessed with being part of God's Kingdom.

      Shame/Honor cultures are uniquely suited to things like crimes against humanity. For instance: Tutsi/Hutu genocide, the Armenian
      genocide, The rape of Nan King (Japan is still a Shame/Honor society) Darfur, Chinese Cultural revolution. In China the shame/honor paradigm was and is used as a powerful lever to gain compliance. A group has no individuals and so there are no human rights to a collectivist.
      Collectivist thinking enables people to commit atrocities from the anonymity of the group.
      This still astounds me as you show your levels of ignorance and bigotry. Are you implying that individualistic cultures haven't produced crimes against humanity? Here's a news flash - any system composed by man, including Christianity, can be abused and produce atrocities. This is not an argument against the system itself though.
    1. JonathanDJ's Avatar
      JonathanDJ -
      I never said that you were a Savage Manwe. I'm sorry if you got that impression from what I said. I'm talking about a set of ideas about how to live life. I think God has always been opposed to collectivist thinking but He makes it clear in Jeremiah:

      30 But every one shall die for his own iniquity: every man that eateth the sour grape, his teeth shall be set on edge .

      This verse as well as others challenges peoples notion at that time of collective guilt. Or alternatively inherited guilt which is also a concept common to Shame Honor cultures.
      BTW Manwe, why are you personalizing this? I thought we were talking about the sociological paradigm of 1st century Judea. Or is your real motivation personal pride in your own culture and you're trying to use the Bible to claim that your culture is superior to others?
      No, I don't think individualist culture will result in morally upright behavior anymore than a Shame/Honor culture will. It merely offers the most protection and opportunity for people.
    1. JonathanDJ's Avatar
      JonathanDJ -
      David if I were you I would check with more than one source when using Wikipedia. By merely looking at the context of the passage you'll see why the interpretation you are sharing is wrong. In the beginning of the conversation Jesus addresses a popular misinterpretation of an Old Testament maxim: "Eye for eye and tooth for tooth". They were taking it to mean that they should get even with those who offend or harm them. So we have our context for the discussion; namely, the habit of getting even with others. Jesus then goes on to say the things we have already been discussing. Your editor at Wikipedia completely missed the point of the dialog. If you read the passage I was discussing in my post before this one you'll see another example of God moving the people away from collectivist thinking.
    1. JonathanDJ's Avatar
      JonathanDJ -
      Manwe you still haven't offered a shred of evidence that your viewpoint is the correct one. All you've done is insult me personally. That's usually what people do when they can't challenge the evidence and arguments made by the other person. I never said that evil things haven't happened in Innocence/Guilt cultures (Individualist). I'm pointing out a pattern. One of the hallmarks of Shame/Honor cultures is people defining right and wrong in terms of popular opinion. They determine what course of action to take based on what is approved of by the collective. This kind of thinking easily leads to a mob-ocracy. As far as your other criticisms I answered David's criticisms on the same passages and my answers should suffice for your objections.
    1. JonathanDJ's Avatar
      JonathanDJ -
      7 I tell you that in the same way there will be more rejoicing in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous persons who do not need to repent.


      [QUOTE=Manwë Súlimo;3387357
      Yes, and? Should jailers hold daily celebrations for going another day without a jailbreak? The 99 are upholding the expected status quo..[/QUOTE]

      It would seem that here you are now attacking Jesus?
    1. Rational Gaze's Avatar
      Rational Gaze -
      Quote Originally posted by Teallaura View Post
      but what I've been reading about Japan, especially Modern Japan, the use of false modesty to curry honor is somewhat common.
      The same happens in Iran:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taarof
    1. authentic8's Avatar
      authentic8 -
      Quote Originally posted by Manwë Súlimo View Post
      Okay, I want you to try this again; but this time in comprehensible English. What point are you trying to make?
      The English is comprehensible (so no need for that insult). But I am also not sure about the point or relevance.
    1. Daniel7:14's Avatar
      Daniel7:14 -
      Just wondering if the "shame-honor" paradigm isn't played out, to the "full", at the end of all things......
    1. Andius's Avatar
      Andius -
      Quote Originally posted by Daniel7:14 View Post
      Just wondering if the "shame-honor" paradigm isn't played out, to the "full", at the end of all things......
      Given how the Lord's all seeing gaze is upon each and all our actions, it plays out ultimately on the shame or honor that He bestows.
    1. George Blaisdell's Avatar
      George Blaisdell -
      Quote Originally posted by Manwë Súlimo View Post
      As someone that would like to be intellectually honest and one that's a historian in training, I have to try to understand an event in its proper context so that means I have to understand things like honor and shame.
      IF you wish to understand a Christian event in its proper context from a Christian perspective, and especially Christian events taken from the Christian Bible, then you must perceive it as a Christian, for it is the Christian Faith that IS the context of understanding Christian Biblical events...

      To your point above, Christ EMBRACED pain and suffering and shame on the Cross and therein overcame it and made holy what is shameful - eg death on the cross - This is foolishness to the world, and you will only find foolishness in it IF you investigate it from a worldly historical perspective...

      Arsenios
    1. KingsGambit's Avatar
      KingsGambit -
      Quote Originally posted by George Blaisdell View Post
      IF you wish to understand a Christian event in its proper context from a Christian perspective, and especially Christian events taken from the Christian Bible, then you must perceive it as a Christian, for it is the Christian Faith that IS the context of understanding Christian Biblical events...

      To your point above, Christ EMBRACED pain and suffering and shame on the Cross and therein overcame it and made holy what is shameful - eg death on the cross - This is foolishness to the world, and you will only find foolishness in it IF you investigate it from a worldly historical perspective...

      Arsenios
      This is circular reasoning.
    1. George Blaisdell's Avatar
      George Blaisdell -
      Quote Originally posted by KingsGambit View Post
      This is circular reasoning.
      And this is your linear response??

      Perhaps you might lay out the reasoning you perceived and we can take a look...

      All I said was that you cannot KNOW NFL quarterbacking without BEING an NFL quarterback...

      Those of us who are not quarterbacks are FANS...

      Unless, of course, you are another member on the team, or the opposing team, in which case other non-quarterback relationships appertain...

      OR... As an old Italian friend of mine used to say: "You no playah dah game, you no knowah dah game..." It is true of all things... Without DOING, one cannot KNOW - You can only know ABOUT...

      IZZATSOCIRCULAR???


      Arsenios
  • Recent Articles

    ApologiaPhoenix

    An Unbelievable? Podcast

    What can we learn from our friends across the pond?

    The link can be found here

    The text is as follows:

    What's coming up on the Deeper Waters podcast? Let's talk about it today on Deeper Waters.

    I actually just finished the interview for the Deeper Waters podcast about half an hour or so ago. This time, I interviewed Justin Brierley of Unbelievable? and talked with him about the show Unbelievable? and about the conference of the same name happening annually in the U.K.

    Unbelievable? has been one of my favorite shows since I've started listening. Justin Brierley is a wonderful host/moderator who brings on excellent guests and who manages to remain quite neutral in his... read more
    ApologiaPhoenix May 17th 2013, 12:28 PM
    GPiper

    Glory Seed Devotional 05/17/2013



    A Glory Seed Devotional
    Jesus, Gyroscopes, and You

    D.L. Moody in his book “Thoughts for the Quiet Hour” writes, “We need have only one care, that we put the first thing first—faithfulness to God. Then all else we need for both worlds will be supplied. God will never fail us: but we forget, sometimes, in our rejoicing over such an assurance, that we must fulfill our part if we would claim the divine promise. It will not always be easy. To-morrow it may mean a distasteful task, a disagreeable duty, a costly sacrifice for one who does not seem worthy. Life is full of sore testings of our willingness to follow the Good Shepherd. We have not the slightest right to claim this assurance unless we have taken Christ... read more
    GPiper May 17th 2013, 08:38 AM
    ApologiaPhoenix

    Are All Beliefs To Be Respected?

    Do we have respect wrong?

    The link can be found here

    The text is as follows:

    Are we misunderstanding respect? Let's talk about it on Deeper Waters.

    Quite recently, I have seen several interactions in the internet world with people of different beliefs and each time I have seen statements like "I respect your beliefs" or "Let's all try to respect the beliefs of one another." I understand why some people make such sentiments, but I cannot help but think that they are fundamentally built on an error.

    For instance, let's suppose I think a belief is fundamentally false. In fact, not only do I think that the belief is false, but I also think that it is... read more
    ApologiaPhoenix May 16th 2013, 12:16 PM
    GPiper

    NSM Evotional 05/16/2013



    A Glory Seed Devotional
    Jesus wants to be the only life between God and you!

    When the going gets tough the tough instead of depending on their own abilities surrender their toughness to an unbeatable God who according to Jeremiah (chapter 29) promises us an unbeatable plan for their lives, and according to the writer of Hebrews “God can’t break his word.”

    “When God wanted to guarantee his promises, he gave his word, a rock-solid guarantee—God can't break his word. And because his word cannot change, the promise is likewise unchangeable. We who have run for our very lives to God have every reason to grab the promised hope with both hands and never let go. It's an unbreakable spiritual... read more
    GPiper May 16th 2013, 08:27 AM
    ApologiaPhoenix

    Apologetics Inoculation

    An ounce of prevention....

    The link can be found here

    The text is as follows:

    Are we prepared for missions service? Let's talk about it on Deeper Waters.

    Let's suppose your church group was wanting to go on a mission trip to a country in Africa. You were told that you are going to an area where Malaria is common. There is a harmless vaccination you can get to inoculate you against the disease that is also inexpensive. Or, you could go and get it and afterwards have a much harder time recovering from the sickness and enjoying all the effects of it.

    Which one do you do?

    I would hope that most of you would say "I'm not going to be foolhardy! By all... read more
    ApologiaPhoenix May 15th 2013, 01:30 PM
    GPiper

    NSM Evotional 05/15/2013



    A Glory Seed Devotional
    Living the Christian Life

    There are times when living the Christian Life doesn’t make any sense to me. Yesterday I quoted, “Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me, for I am gentle and lowly in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.” (Matthew 11:28-30 ESV) Yet this morning I find myself embattled by the struggles of living a Christian Life in a Me-Me world.

    One of my favorite verses I fall back on in order to make sense of living in this Me-Me world is, “I've told you all this so that trusting me, you will be unshakable and assured, deeply... read more
    GPiper May 15th 2013, 08:29 AM
    ApologiaPhoenix

    Poythress, Science, and the Bible

    Are we fighting the wrong battle?

    The link can be found here

    The text is as follows:

    What are we to think of the debate on Adam? Let's talk about it on Deeper Waters.

    A friend of Deeper Waters recently sent me an article wanting a response. It's written by Vern Poythress and can be found here. My problem mainly with how to approach this is that I am not a scientist. I do not speak in scientific terms and if I have no reason to think that someone has not done strong scientific study, I question their statements. Theologians, philosophers, and historians who wish to speak on science as science should study science as science.

    Unfortunately, those in the other camp don't... read more
    ApologiaPhoenix May 14th 2013, 01:17 PM
    GPiper

    NSM Evotional 05/14/2013



    A Glory Seed Devotional
    The Rat Race, God, you, and the rats

    The rats are still winning the Rat Race!

    Several times I’ve considered dropping out and there have been brief periods of time when I have gone on vacation but the gravitational pull of the race always snags me and brings me back. I really thought once I retired I could graciously resign but no I was mistaken and as the rats continued to race past me I could hear them snickering. One time I did have a chance to talk to one and I asked him what the Rat Race was all about in response to my question he said to me, “Oh, you think we’re in it to win but that’s not our goal, our goal is to beat you into submission. See later loser,” and... read more
    GPiper May 14th 2013, 08:14 AM