Arguments about God - Blogs - TheologyWeb Campus

View RSS Feed

Griggsy

Arguments about God

Rate this Entry
Quote Originally posted by Griggsy View Post
[I ]No, the quantum energy is eternal in line with the law of conservation. Aquinas and poor,poor Feser are making the equivocation betwixt a real origination from nothing and the acutal transformation of matter -energy. The former is absurd whilst, as just noted, the latter exists forever.
Thus, Creator God still means no sort of explanation, and He does not act behind or in the Metaverse, thus He is forever unemployed!
God of the scientific gaps and God of the explanatory gap - Aquinas and Leibniz- mean nothing at all!
Anyway, the fallacy of composition, might not apply, but then God still does not enter, because as Existence is all, no transcendent God can possibly exist per Reichenbach's argument.
Again, theists must before stating their other arguments argue how He can act behind and in the Metaverse without being the magical God of let it be! After eons, no theists have illustrated how He could act, so from the first their arguments fail.
Technomange, our work is a work out with these people! I'm trying to rein in my ornate style.[/I]
Tags: None Add / Edit Tags
Categories
Uncategorized

Comments