Griggsy

Originally posted by Griggsy

Inane questions cannot instantiate Him!
It's immaterial what Levy-Bruhl says about reduced animism, because he assumes that putative God has intent when science, and not just a philosophical point, denies that. Thus, full and reduced animisms rely on no-intent whatsoever!
Theism then is just another superstition like its twin superstiton paranormalism, what together Paul Kurtz calls " The Transendental Temptation," a greater work than the "Summa" without all that specious verbiage. I read that book in Spanish.
I thank Feser for recognizing that theists demand an explanation for what is instead of why not nothing as that explicates that they just have that " mustabatory" need for HIm,despite His adding nothing as the sufficient reason or the primary cause
Ti's no dereliction of duty to note with the Lord, Lord Russell, the Metaverse just is whilst from its quantum fields come forth universes!
Science itself will add to how and why come the transformations, and no real origination occurred! Thus, those who bemoan the loss of Him as the real originator just falsely telll us why, you aren't letting your metaphysics act for the sufficient reason to appear t you!
No sin impels us non-theists but instead the absurdities inherent in religions! No stunting of the mind with the acknowledgment that He is no kind of answer to anything whatsoever1
Yet, theists just have to have that unnecessary need to have HIm as that primary cause, ignoring blithely that He adds nothng to causation,but only is an obscurantism as any kind of explanation1
No reason dictates that He must be simple but unconfirmed intuitions! Thus, those who dismiss Dawkins' argument from complexity merely aver by the argument from ignorance and beg the question of His simplicity!
My signature affirms that bane!