Griggsy

Originally posted by Griggsy

[I] When we naturalists query what made or design , supernaturalists accuse us of committing logical fallacies. William Sahakian alleges that we commit the loaded one of mulitple questions - have you stopped beating your wife, and others that we make the category mistake of comparing Him with us, but it is they who beg the question and special plead to make Him different!
As with the ignostic challenge, we ever must require them to proffer evidence for what they maintain rather than letting them misdirect us!
We ignostics require that they use the empirical method to define Him. They cannot define Him [ without evidence for His attributes,]postulate Him or use faith to instantiate Him![/I]