Griggsy

Originally posted by Griggsy

Supernaturalists use the arguments from incredulity and from ignorance in arguing about God.

They use Leibniz's colossal blunder in asking why is there something rather than nothing as it is so incredulous to fnd that nothing could exist, and to answer God made Existence is to answer from ignorance.

Why do we find order and regularity and natural laws is to be incredulous and to miss what the pre-Socratics note inhere in Existence itself, and again that question use increduly and ignorance.

How can we have a grounded morality is another argument from incredulity with the argument from ignorance that God makes morality so when the thread natural morality illuminates otherwise.


It is incredulous to ask why do we see design when per Lamberth's teleonomic argument and his argument from pareidolia we only see patterns and intent, and from the atelic argument that supernaturalists beg the question of intent-wanted outcomes- that we or a comparable species would evolve to be in a relationshipe with Him.
and his argument from pareidolia illuminate.

And history teaches us that it is incredulous to ask didn't God save Jewry, bless America and spread Christianity so fast?

Therefore, the presumptions of naturalism and rationalism hold.See the two threads.