---

Russell C. Crawford Odayman • a day ago

The fact is that the founding logic of the modern pro life movement was found in the Nazi party. The Nazis murdered abortion doctors, jailed women, passed pro life laws and killed wanted life to save fetuses. http://books.google.com/books?...
Russell C. Crawford labraun • a day ago

If there is reasonable doubt then it is not murder. There is always reasonable doubt with a zygote/embryo/fetus because most die from natural abortion.
Russell C. Crawford Christy • 17 hours ago

But every born baby killed by pro lifers was alive and born and capable of pain. Pro lifers murder those babies to save fetuses that may not even be human.
Russell C. Crawford MCE299 • 13 hours ago

I agree that a born baby is in fact a baby.

The fact is that pro lifers kill born babies. There are scientific laws that show that more people are dying than can be saved. For that reason pro lifers have a choice, they can save one of the dying born people or let that person die and instead attempt to save a fetus. If they choose to save a fetus, then the born baby dies. So a choice to be pro life is a choice to let born babies die to save fetuses. Search "scientific abortion laws" on google.
Russell C. Crawford Sams_1 • 17 hours ago

Pro lifers murder born babies to save fetuses, that is insane.
Russell C. Crawford Lisa Woodward • 13 hours ago

Actually until the DNA of the genotype expresses the correct phenotype it is impossible to tell if the product of conception is alive or human. In fact 42 percent of conceptions are not human enough to live as humans and 70 percent die in the first trimester. So the continuing stages idea is false.
The historical fact is that the Nazis were the founders of the modern pro life movement. They passed laws that allowed the murder of abortion doctors, denied birth control to women and killed born babies to force the birth of unwanted fetuses. I am sorry that you have believed a load of BS and were brainwashed. But what I state is historical fact. If you need multiple links to proof then I will furnish more. But the link above is balanced and fair. Read it.

---

---

No, Russell's argument is very serious. If you oppose choice because it is killing, then you either oppose all war, because that is killing too, or you decide what killing you support and what killing you oppose. If you're into the business of deciding when killing is OK, you have lost your moral absolute. All we have is a disagreement about where the line is drawn. If you oppose choice then you want to be the dictator who decides for others where they are permitted to draw that moral line.

---

---

Russell C. Crawford Christy • a day ago

There are born live people to which the right to life applies, pro lifers murder those live people to save fetuses. Get your facts straight.
Russell C. Crawford Christy • a day ago

Christy, to see a small group of the people you murder go here: http://www.poverty.com
But those are just a small sample. There are 1.8 born people dying each second. So no you are not aobut saving life, you are about murder.
Russell C. Crawford Christy • a day ago

No, I am arguing to save the most life possible.--- What your trying to abue is that we should have killed these born people that have survived gestation, so they wouldn't even have a chance.___

You place the fetus above innocent born babies.
Russell C. Crawford Christy • a day ago

I am not talking about the chilling murder of George Tiller as he attended Church or the other murders of innocent pro choice people as they saved life. I am speaking of the murders of innocent born life by evil pro lifers. You have a choice, you may save born babies or you may kill them and instead attempt to force the birth of a fetus. ----- Those are your most evil murders, pro lifers killing the children of their neighbors.
Russell C. Crawford MiguelLC • a day ago

The persons imposing anti freedom are pro lifers. Not only do they murder born babies, they take away Constitutional rights, murder doctors, bomb clinics and harass women.
Russell C. Crawford MakerMarked • a day ago

Pro lifers have a choice, they can save born black babies, children and adults or they may choose to let them die and instead save a white fetus. Pro lifers choose to save the fetus and let the black people die.
Russell C. Crawford Christy • a day ago

There are 1.8 born babies dying each second. There are more born people dying than can be saved.
So a choice to spend any time at all saving fetuses will cause the death of an innocent born baby, child or adult. If you are suggesting that saving fetuses is more important than saving babies, then make it. But don't call that being pro life, that is killing born babies to force the birth of fetuses. That makes pro lifers admitted murderers.
Russell C. Crawford Christy • a day ago

Christy, you have a choice, you may save born babies or let them die to save fetuses. That is evil. You claim to save life, yet you let it die to save a fetus. You are not saving life, you are killing one life to force the birth of another.
Russell C. Crawford Cjones • 13 hours ago

Pro lifers murder born babies to save fetuses. It is the murder of real born and innocent babies that can feel pain are are loved and wanted that make you an evil person. Pro choice people save life.
Russell C. Crawford kcard82 • 17 hours ago

Now pro lifers are trying to enslave women.
Russell C. Crawford Cjones • a day ago

The scientific fact is that there have not be 56 million murdered children, you are lying. Look at my avatar, the birth rate dropped during the pro life period before Roe and increased by nearly 2 million per year after abortion became legal. So you are just wrong. Abortion saved millions and pro lifers caused the death of millions. https://www.facebook.com/Natur...
Christy Russell C. Crawford • a day ago

---

---

So if this was true, shouldn't you want another pro-life period to drop the birth rate or are you against born people?

---

---

I am for saving the most life possible through triage. Pro lifers are for murdering born babies to save fetuses.
Russell C. Crawford Christy • 17 hours ago

There are 57 million born babies, children and adults dying this year. That works out to 1.8 born people dying each second. There are so many dying that it is impossible to save them all. And if you choose not to save a born person, it dies. So we all have a choice, we may choose to save born babies or we may choose to save fetuses. Pro lifers choose to let born babies die and instead focus on saving fetuses.
I don't mind if you save fetuses, but you are not saving life, you are simply letting born babies die and saving fetuses. There is no net gain in life saved. You kill one to save the other.
Russell C. Crawford leehelm1 • 17 hours ago

You use the word baby instead of fetus because it give you the moral authority to kill born babies. You think that by denying that a fetus exists, you will be able to intentionally murder born babies and get away with your murders. I will not allow you to get away with your lies. A fetus is not a baby. A fetus has a fetal heart, fetal lungs, fetal digestive system, fetal brain and is not a baby. Your lie about fetuses will no longer work. So just stop murdering babies, OK?
Russell C. Crawford MiguelLC • a day ago

You are supporting killing innocent born life by imposing false ideas on life saving abortion facilities. You are killing born life so that you can enjoy your self aggrandizing and fetus worshiping insanity.

---