Announcement

Collapse

Biblical Ethics 301 Guidelines

This forum is for Christians to discuss ethical issues within Christianity. Non-theists, non-christians, and unorthodox Christians should not post here without first getting permission from the area's moderators.

If you have a question about what's OK and what's not OK, please contact the moderators.


Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

A question I have

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A question I have

    I was reading my devotional bible and in luke Jesus speaks of selling your cloak and buying a sword. He also said however that one who lives by the sword dies by the sword.

    In that case how are we to view things like self defense or serving in a war as christians?

    I know Jesus congratulated the soldier ( A centurion one of the most well trained soldiers in antiquity) and Paul uses boxers and soldiers in his metaphors on faith.

    I would like to know your thoughts.
    Personally I see no problem in self defense ormilitary service.
    sigpic

  • #2
    I'm still working out exactly what I think about this but one possible way to interpret Jesus's statement is that he's describing how things are (like in Proverbs) and not actually saying never to use swords.

    I lean toward pacifism because the early church was almost entirely pacifist.
    "I am not angered that the Moral Majority boys campaign against abortion. I am angry when the same men who say, "Save OUR children" bellow "Build more and bigger bombers." That's right! Blast the children in other nations into eternity, or limbless misery as they lay crippled from "OUR" bombers! This does not jell." - Leonard Ravenhill

    Comment


    • #3
      Makes sense.

      I am aa man who struggles with my temper at times. As a result I work and pray against hotheadedness. It has never helped me being hotheaded.

      I think both pacifism and patriotism are interesting. However I would never want my faith to degrade to bbe just a tool for an ideology.

      Thank you KG.
      sigpic

      Comment


      • #4
        I see "living by the sword" as very different from self defense. The former would be like Islam's raiding of caravan's during and eventually conquering of Arabia in Mohammed's time.

        Comment


        • #5
          The New Testament doesn't instruct us to live by the Law (one size fits all rules) but rather by the Spirit.

          This means that if a criminal breaks into your home and threatens you with death that the Spirit may instruct you to lay down your life OR the Spirit may instruct you to kick his [censored]. If you find yourself in that situation you don't want to be asking yourself a bunch of philosophical/theological hooey questions. What you'll need to be doing is asking the Spirit, "Lead me through this in the here and now."
          Actually YOU put Trump in the White House. He wouldn't have gotten 1% of the vote if it wasn't for the widespread spiritual and cultural devastation caused by progressive policies. There's no "this country" left with your immigration policies, your "allies" are worthless and even more suicidal than you are and democracy is a sick joke that I hope nobody ever thinks about repeating when the current order collapses. - Darth_Executor striking a conciliatory note in Civics 101

          Comment


          • #6
            Paul's main emphasis on soldiers was their discipline, courage, commitment... more than a few times they rescued or protected him... but he, especially to Timothy, was using the qualities I mentioned to tell Timothy "be like that".
            The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

            Comment


            • #7
              In Jesus day there were robbers, bandits, wild animals about and as he told his followers to go and preach The Good News in the world they would need some kind of basic protection against such things, thus what he said.
              BU

              Moderator Notice

              You are not authorized to post in a Christian only forum. Please do not do it again.

              ***If you wish to take issue with this notice DO NOT do so in this thread.***
              Contact the forum moderator or an administrator in Private Message or email instead. If you feel you must publicly complain or whine, please take it to the Psychotherapy Room unless told otherwise.

              Last edited by Jedidiah; 01-16-2018, 04:24 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by TheWall View Post
                I was reading my devotional bible and in luke Jesus speaks of selling your cloak and buying a sword. He also said however that one who lives by the sword dies by the sword.

                In that case how are we to view things like self defense or serving in a war as christians?

                I know Jesus congratulated the soldier ( A centurion one of the most well trained soldiers in antiquity) and Paul uses boxers and soldiers in his metaphors on faith.

                I would like to know your thoughts.
                Personally I see no problem in self defense or military service.
                The context help understanding who and when etc..

                Jesus notes that when he sent them out in the past they lacked for nothing and he would have been on hand to help etc..

                But now as he was shortly to die things would change for them so now they would be going out into the world and the wilds in their preaching so they would need some protection maybe for wild animals and robbers etc..

                Regarding joining in national or international warfare say joining the Roman Pagan Legions as you pointed out that was totally a no no.

                Matthew 5:44
                However, I say to you: Continue to love your enemies and to pray for those who persecute you,
                Continue to love your enemies: Jesus’ counsel is in harmony with the spirit of the Hebrew Scriptures.—Ex 23:4,*5; Job 31:29; Prov. 24:17, 18; 25:21.
                Thus no one claming to be Christian cannot go to War.
                BU

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Bibleuser View Post
                  Regarding joining in national or international warfare say joining the Roman Pagan Legions as you pointed out that was totally a no no.

                  Matthew 5:44
                  However, I say to you: Continue to love your enemies and to pray for those who persecute you,
                  Continue to love your enemies: Jesus’ counsel is in harmony with the spirit of the Hebrew Scriptures.—Ex 23:4,*5; Job 31:29; Prov. 24:17, 18; 25:21.
                  Thus no one claming to be Christian cannot go to War.
                  BU

                  Matthew 5:44
                  "But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,"

                  Your quote is fine, but your subsequent interpretation is less so. Other theologians do not agree so you do not have a clear "no no."
                  Micah 6:8 He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by TheWall View Post
                    I was reading my devotional bible and in luke Jesus speaks of selling your cloak and buying a sword. He also said however that one who lives by the sword dies by the sword.

                    In that case how are we to view things like self defense or serving in a war as christians?

                    I know Jesus congratulated the soldier ( A centurion one of the most well trained soldiers in antiquity) and Paul uses boxers and soldiers in his metaphors on faith.

                    I would like to know your thoughts.
                    Personally I see no problem in self defense ormilitary service.
                    So I come on Peter beating up Paul. Who am I suppose to love?



                    Both of them.

                    Now am I loving Paul by permitting Peter to beat up on him? Probably not. So I need to stop Peter. Do I love Peter by killing him? No. So when I stop Peter, I need to use the minimum force to do it.

                    Let's say, Peter is standing some distance away and he has shot Paul already and is shooting anyone he sees. Obviously, he hasn't seen me yet. I could rush him but there's enough open space that he would shot me before I reached him. Apparently, I have to pull out my gun and shot him - trying to just disable but I could kill him. Yet it does seem loving to other potential victims to try and loving to Peter that I didn't try to kill him.

                    You could extend this to nations. No amount of peaceful protest would have stopped Nazi German aggression. It took a lot of force to bring that to a halt. But in some ways that seems a more loving response to the world than standing aside and let them do what they wanted.

                    I respect pacifist for their position and for saying don't go for the violent solution. Unfortunately in this sinful world, sometimes a violent solution is the best solution. It should be the last resort and the minimum required.
                    "For I desire mercy, not sacrifice, and acknowledgment of God rather than burnt offerings." Hosea 6:6

                    "Theology can be an intellectual entertainment." Metropolitan Anthony Bloom

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Jedidiah View Post
                      Matthew 5:44
                      "But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you,"

                      Your quote is fine, but your subsequent interpretation is less so. Other theologians do not agree so you do not have a clear "no no."
                      John 13:34, 35
                      I am giving you a new commandment, that you love one another; just as I have loved you, you also love one another.
                      35 By this all will know that you are my disciples—IF you have love among yourselves.”

                      A big "IF"!
                      War = no love
                      A commandment must be followed.
                      No love no discipleship!
                      BU

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Bibleuser View Post
                        John 13:34, 35
                        I am giving you a new commandment, that you love one another; just as I have loved you, you also love one another.
                        35 By this all will know that you are my disciples—IF you have love among yourselves.”

                        A big "IF"!
                        War = no love
                        A commandment must be followed.
                        No love no discipleship!
                        BU
                        To whom was He speaking?

                        33 Little children, yet a little while I am with you. You will seek me, and just as I said to the Jews, so now I also say to you, ‘Where I am going you cannot come.’ 34 A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. 35 By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”


                        Well, lookie there, He was talking to His disciples, about "one another".
                        The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Bibleuser View Post
                          The context help understanding who and when etc..

                          Jesus notes that when he sent them out in the past they lacked for nothing and he would have been on hand to help etc..

                          But now as he was shortly to die things would change for them so now they would be going out into the world and the wilds in their preaching so they would need some protection maybe for wild animals and robbers etc..

                          Regarding joining in national or international warfare say joining the Roman Pagan Legions as you pointed out that was totally a no no.

                          Matthew 5:44
                          However, I say to you: Continue to love your enemies and to pray for those who persecute you,
                          Continue to love your enemies: Jesus’ counsel is in harmony with the spirit of the Hebrew Scriptures.—Ex 23:4,*5; Job 31:29; Prov. 24:17, 18; 25:21.
                          Thus no one claming to be Christian cannot go to War.
                          BU

                          Moderator Notice

                          You are not authorized to post in a Christian only forum. Please do not do it again.

                          ***If you wish to take issue with this notice DO NOT do so in this thread.***
                          Contact the forum moderator or an administrator in Private Message or email instead. If you feel you must publicly complain or whine, please take it to the Psychotherapy Room unless told otherwise.



                          Moderator Notice

                          Notice to myself and others - do not respond BU in this forum please

                          ***If you wish to take issue with this notice DO NOT do so in this thread.***
                          Contact the forum moderator or an administrator in Private Message or email instead. If you feel you must publicly complain or whine, please take it to the Psychotherapy Room unless told otherwise.

                          Micah 6:8 He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by TheWall View Post
                            I was reading my devotional bible and in luke Jesus speaks of selling your cloak and buying a sword. He also said however that one who lives by the sword dies by the sword.

                            In that case how are we to view things like self defense or serving in a war as christians?

                            I know Jesus congratulated the soldier ( A centurion one of the most well trained soldiers in antiquity) and Paul uses boxers and soldiers in his metaphors on faith.

                            I would like to know your thoughts.
                            Personally I see no problem in self defense ormilitary service.
                            I have no doubt that WW2 was a Just War, and that Hitler and the Third Reich needed exactly what happened to them. I think it was ludicrous to apologise for the bombing of Dresden - the Germans followed a false prophet and fore-runner of Antichrist, and obeyed and worshipped their false prophet, so they had it coming. (So, too, does a lot of the West - but that is a different story.)

                            It would not have been Christian, but grossly immoral, not to fight against Hitler. I wish the US had come into the War much earlier - but it didn’t, so that is all there is to it. As guidance for international politics, any nation that totally disarmed would be committing suicide - and rulers have no right to do that to those they rule. Such a nation would be failing to defend its people, and empowering its invaders, and laying itself open to be raped and pillaged and murdered.

                            I don’t believe the Sermon on the Mount has anything to offer about international politics, and I don’t think it was intended to. Jesus was talking to Jews, in Palestine, about relations between Palestinian Jews - that His Words were adopted or edited, or whatever, for Christian, wider, use, is (humanly speaking) a mere co-incidence. To that extent, C. I. Scofield was correct in seeing a difference between what Jesus said, and what St Paul said.

                            This has very troubling implications for Christianity, because it means we are still imprisoned by the need to meet violence with violence. This seems to me to be a very serious objection to the Teaching of Christ - it is just not practical. It works, if at all, only in the diluted version of it found in the Letters. And that was within 2 generations. Now, in a wholly different culture, I think it is of no practical value at all.

                            What we really need is a new Bible, one that is not 1900 years behind the times. But we won’t get one. Still, a Bible that addressed issues like international politics, weapons production, abortion, women’s rights, human rights, voting, immigration, population control, eugenics, marriage failure, party politics, capitalism, imperialism, debt slavery, mortgages and other pressing issues that have real effects on people, would be much more useful than a Bible that talks about long-dead Jewish kings, rotas of Temple priests, returning Exiles, and the 19 sons of David (I counted); none of which are of the slightest importance today.

                            Comment

                            widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
                            Working...
                            X