My previous views on immigration were born out of sense of loyalty to Western Civilization.
I owe a huge debt to the artists, thinkers, and innovators of the past 2,000 years.
To me it is obvious that this is a legacy worth preserving - a legacy far superior to anything developed in the east.
At some point our civilization became proud.
We became convinced that basic math, biology, and common sense just didn't apply to us anymore.
The arrogance has now reached a point where we are openly inviting our enemies into our midst.
I'd continue to fight this suicidal policy but the fight would only effect the 'when' and not the 'if'.
Westerners simply aren't making babies anymore - we're just too damn smart for that sort of thing.
Raising kids, building families, growing old is so passé, so provincial, so old fashioned.
Here are our choices:
1: Fight off the influx of medieval peasants so that liberalism can continue to work towards the extinction of humanity.
2: Allow the influx of medieval peasants to eventually establish a caliphate, Islamic law, and the extinction of liberalism.
Given that liberals have proven they cannot run a Rotary Club, much less a nation, I think I'm left hoping for a caliphate because those have been known to exist for centuries and society needs something, anything, to organize itself. I say if we're going to completely surrender our senses that Islam is far superior to liberalism. I'm not happy with that arrangement but given the choice between suicide and a government that actually believes something I'll pick the people with some sort of moral compass every time.
I owe a huge debt to the artists, thinkers, and innovators of the past 2,000 years.
To me it is obvious that this is a legacy worth preserving - a legacy far superior to anything developed in the east.
At some point our civilization became proud.
We became convinced that basic math, biology, and common sense just didn't apply to us anymore.
The arrogance has now reached a point where we are openly inviting our enemies into our midst.
I'd continue to fight this suicidal policy but the fight would only effect the 'when' and not the 'if'.
Westerners simply aren't making babies anymore - we're just too damn smart for that sort of thing.
Raising kids, building families, growing old is so passé, so provincial, so old fashioned.
Here are our choices:
1: Fight off the influx of medieval peasants so that liberalism can continue to work towards the extinction of humanity.
2: Allow the influx of medieval peasants to eventually establish a caliphate, Islamic law, and the extinction of liberalism.
Given that liberals have proven they cannot run a Rotary Club, much less a nation, I think I'm left hoping for a caliphate because those have been known to exist for centuries and society needs something, anything, to organize itself. I say if we're going to completely surrender our senses that Islam is far superior to liberalism. I'm not happy with that arrangement but given the choice between suicide and a government that actually believes something I'll pick the people with some sort of moral compass every time.
Comment