"Gun free zones" should be illegal.

Also worth noting that Maryland has strict gun laws, including background checks and requiring registration to even purchase.

A good guy with a gun stopped a bad gun with a gun!

Finally!

Good! And thank God there were no fatalities.

Apparently there was a rumor about a possible school shooting there a few weeks ago:

The most important difference between a good guy with a gun and a bad guy with a gun is that the bad guy shoots first.

Except the bad guy!

Ah, the story originally said no fatalities. I don't celebrate anybody's death, but I suppose it's better him than an innocent victim.

Yes, he died at the hospital. But it could have been much worse...

It happens more often than you think. But since you only get news from the MSM you don't usually hear about it at all.

Yep. As soon as it was revealed that there was a hero with a gun, the mainstream media suddenly went dark on this story.

Indeed. In the past I've cited multiple cases where the MSM seems to completely miss the fact that a shooter was stopped by armed citizens. Here is but one of many examples.

Back in January 16, 2002, Peter Odighizuwa a 43-year-old naturalized citizen from Nigeria, who had flunked out of the Appalachian School of Law in Grundy, Virginia returned and went on a shooting spree killing 3 including the Dean of the school. He was stopped when two of the students, Tracy Bridges and Mikael Gross, ran out to their cars, got pistols out of them, and returned to the school. There the two armed students confronted the gunman, whom upon seeing the other students with guns, stopped shooting, threw his own gun down and surrendered. He then punched a student and was physically subdued.

Out of 280 separate news stories in the week after the event, only 4 mentioned that the students who stopped the attack had guns, and only 2 (local) newspapers mentioned that the students actually pointed their guns at the attacker. Most in the media who discussed how the attack was stopped said, things like "students overpowered a gunmen," or like the New York Times, only that the attacker was "tackled by fellow students."

This sort of coverage is typical. In the other public school shootings where citizens with guns have stopped attacks, rarely do more than 1% of the news stories mention that citizens with guns stopped the attacks. This censorship is actually dangerous in that it misleads the public in how to handle a similar situation if they are ever confronted by it.

Sources missing, and the mainstream media conveniently misrepresented. There's not even a tiny chance you didn't plagiarize this, so I won't bother googling it. Sometimes it pays to do your own research, rouge, and it always pays to apply a little critical thinking to accounts about the mainstream media found in fringe media.

3 Slain at Law School; Student Is Held

The "students" who subdued Odighizuwa were also trained LEOs, which you would know if you had read the Times article yourself, a serious omission. Mr. Gross' account includes the detail that he was both armed and wearing a vest, another serious omission.

And lastly, if, as your unnamed source claims, a bare handful of media accounts included the detail that Odighizuwa threw down his weapon when confronted at gunpoint, contrary to Mr. Gross account, odds are it's because the handful of accounts added the detail to sensationalize the story and dupe their chosen demographic.