Announcement

Collapse

Civics 101 Guidelines

Want to argue about politics? Healthcare reform? Taxes? Governments? You've come to the right place!

Try to keep it civil though. The rules still apply here.
See more
See less

Pro-Choice Racism?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pro-Choice Racism?

    Why is the 'pro-choice' party so anti-choice when it comes to School Choice?

    Black and Latino Millennials Overwhelmingly Support School Choice

    Why is it more important for liberals to cower to teacher unions and stand against school choice?

    As I was researching this, it became painfully obvious that most (if not all) of the articles dealing with Blacks and Hispanics and school choice come from conservative or leaning conservative sources.

    Is this yet another case of liberals thinking they know better what's good for other people than the people themselves? In this case, Blacks and Hispanics?

    Why is the 'pro-choice' party not for choice in education?
    The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
    Why is the 'pro-choice' party so anti-choice when it comes to School Choice?

    Black and Latino Millennials Overwhelmingly Support School Choice

    Why is it more important for liberals to cower to teacher unions and stand against school choice?

    As I was researching this, it became painfully obvious that most (if not all) of the articles dealing with Blacks and Hispanics and school choice come from conservative or leaning conservative sources.

    Is this yet another case of liberals thinking they know better what's good for other people than the people themselves? In this case, Blacks and Hispanics?

    Why is the 'pro-choice' party not for choice in education?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
      Why is the 'pro-choice' party not for choice in education?

      The fallacy of equivocation occurs when a key term or phrase in an argument is used in an ambiguous way, with one meaning in one portion of the argument and then another meaning in another portion of the argument. Examples: I have the right to watch "The Real World." Therefore it's right for me to watch the show.



      :themoreyouknow:

      Comment


      • #4
        So, how would you have framed it? The same people who claim to be "pro-choice" seem to be very selective in who gets to choose what.

        Meh.... that's stretching it.

        Gosh, you say the sweetest things.

        I think there's a difference between
        A) being against a policy that, in many cases, is abused, and is a transfer of wealth, and seems like a bottomless pit of sorts and
        2) allowing minorities to choose which schools their children attend.
        The first to state his case seems right until another comes and cross-examines him.

        Comment

        Related Threads

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by seer, Yesterday, 11:06 AM
        3 responses
        86 views
        0 likes
        Last Post Sam
        by Sam
         
        Started by carpedm9587, Yesterday, 07:03 AM
        16 responses
        86 views
        0 likes
        Last Post Mountain Man  
        Started by rogue06, 05-17-2024, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 likes
        Last Post rogue06
        by rogue06
         
        Started by seer, 05-16-2024, 05:00 PM
        0 responses
        32 views
        0 likes
        Last Post seer
        by seer
         
        Started by seer, 05-16-2024, 11:43 AM
        208 responses
        829 views
        0 likes
        Last Post eider
        by eider
         
        Working...
        X