Search:

Type: Posts; User: JimL

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.16 seconds.

  1. No there isn't, it was already determined that...

    No there isn't, it was already determined that Ukraine had taken sufficient actions regarding corruption in order that the appropriated aid be delivered, and to withhold all of the aid against that...
  2. There is no other legitimate reason for the hold...

    There is no other legitimate reason for the hold on aid, and, as required by law, Trump gave no reason to Congress for the hold on the aid, and, according to testimony, everyone involved, including...
  3. Replies
    166
    Views
    2,118

    Exactly, so he didn't escalate the situation as...

    Exactly, so he didn't escalate the situation as rogue would have us believe, he was fired upon.
  4. Those in our own government testified to...

    Those in our own government testified to discussing it with Ukranian officials, including Sondland, Taylor, Cooper who all testified to it under oath in the House inquiry.
  5. Because they didn't fall for the presidents trap...

    Because they didn't fall for the presidents trap to delay, delay, delay, until the election was over and because they got enough patriotic Americans to defy the Presidents orders and testify, as well...
  6. This president didn't claim executive privilege!...

    This president didn't claim executive privilege! And there is a nefarious reason for his not doing so. Discovery! He would then have to give reason for the claim. So he didn't claim executive...
  7. No, it doesn't seem that Ukraine didn't know, it...

    No, it doesn't seem that Ukraine didn't know, it seems they did know of the hold on the aid before the infamous phone call in July. Did you not watch the trial testimony. What made my ears perk up...
  8. No, I didn't suggest that they couldn't go to...

    No, I didn't suggest that they couldn't go to court, I suggested that for Congress to have to fight every supoena in court would render their Constitutional requirement to hold a corrupt president to...
  9. Lilpix, neither Nixon or Clinton refused to allow...

    Lilpix, neither Nixon or Clinton refused to allow any one in their administration from testifying, you simply have no idea what you are blabbing about.
  10. The traitor you should be concerning yourself...

    The traitor you should be concerning yourself with mike, is the one presently in the White House.
  11. Replies
    87
    Views
    1,258

    Poll: We mustache him some questions!

    We mustache him some questions!
  12. Right, the phone call made it clear that it...

    Right, the phone call made it clear that it wasn't about corruption in Ukraine, that it was a quid pro quo having to do only with investigations into the Bidens for his political advantage, and into...
  13. That you take that nonsense as wisdom and...

    That you take that nonsense as wisdom and understanding shows that you have little wisdon or understanding. That you believe Stalin and his secret police occupied and ran the U.S. government...
  14. Exactly. He may be a corrupt president, but he's...

    Exactly. He may be a corrupt president, but he's their corrupt president.
  15. Oh please, Trump couldn't care less about...

    Oh please, Trump couldn't care less about corruption, he's as corrupt as they come himself, seer. His mob was actually working with the removed corrupt Ukrainian officials in their attempt to carry...
  16. I hope you have your tin foil hat at the ready,...

    I hope you have your tin foil hat at the ready, mw?
  17. And you've been wrong from the beginning. The...

    And you've been wrong from the beginning. The story claims bribery/extortion for personal gain, an advantage in a U.S. election. How is that not impeachable. No doubt you'd recognize it as...
  18. No president has ever defied the impeachment...

    No president has ever defied the impeachment authority of congress by simply denying all subpoenas of all witnesses and all documents across the board without reason of executive privilege. But what...
  19. They don't need to argue executive privilege, if...

    They don't need to argue executive privilege, if executive privilege was never asserted. They did however argue in court whether or not a subpoenaed individual can defy a congressional supoena simply...
  20. Replies
    110
    Views
    1,197

    Pseudo intellectuals don't get to head the...

    Pseudo intellectuals don't get to head the Harvard Law Review.
  21. Replies
    110
    Views
    1,197

    I take it you're talking about the Tea Party?

    I take it you're talking about the Tea Party?
  22. No executive privilege claimed, MM. How is it...

    No executive privilege claimed, MM. How is it that you are all so misinformed?
  23. :lol: Sorry, but your post shows whose doing your...

    :lol: Sorry, but your post shows whose doing your thinking, and it ain't you. The President never claimed executive privilege!
  24. They dropped them because they recognized the...

    They dropped them because they recognized the Presidents tactic of stonewalling, as is evident in the McGahn case, would take years. The McGahn case, though already ruled on in favor of Congress by...
  25. Replies
    110
    Views
    1,197

    It is a real thing, you're just confused as to...

    It is a real thing, you're just confused as to who it is that's infected with the illness.
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4