Colorado Legislature changed the law.
#win
Type: Posts; User: Darth Xena
Colorado Legislature changed the law.
#win
Legalize it all.
I have posted the heck (don't sure if I can say the other word here) of my ballot since the injunction.
Speaking at Liberty Tour 2016
19449
The reasons for all overboard laws is usually good intentions.
Particularly restrictions on free speech.
FWIW, I use my government name now.
The problem is that the word "right" here is equivocal. You are using it in one sense to mean "moral" (right versus wrong) and in other to refer to things we inherently posses not do or not to do. ...
19408
From LPCO Press Release (copyright is not an issue, I wrote the first part of my release as well as my attorney who wrote the rest):
DENVER CO.- The civil rights lawsuit filed by the...
Nailed it Joel.
Precisely.
Though my goal isn't to *legalize* further groupings, but to get the state out entirely to show the absurdity of the state being in sanctioning licensing personal relationship to begin...
Because not everything that is immoral or "not right" should be illegal. I have a right to do a lot of things that are not moral - particularly when the morality here is a vertical morality...
No I know what I meant. I meant disposal (which I was using in the sense of the right to do with as one sees fit as long as one doesn't infringe upon the rights of another person).
I am not...
Two LPCO conventions ago we had a right to die petitioner who rented a booth. I refused to sign her petition. I said no for many of the same reasons here ... and some not said here. I don't...
Yes Joel, you and I have the same understanding. I am a deontological natural rights adherent.
They could charge you if unsuccessful. Attempting a crime is a crime. But no, more likely they will make information on the exercise of your right unlawful and criminalize anyone who might assist...
Those are the only just laws:) The only legitimate use of force is defensive.
While that might be an interesting argument more time than I have right now. I believe it is self-evidence through self-ownership. (as a supernaturalist I have other grounds obviously)
I'm not a minarchist.
And no rights are not codified by governments. And anarchists are not opposed to governments. They are opposed to the state. There is a difference. Libertarian anarchists...
If self-ownership is a right, and I believe it is incoherent to say that it is not through argumentation ethics, you are making a self-ownership claim in even arguing the point, then there is nothing...
When dealing with human affairs, generally, particularly when talking about the state, we are talking about horizontal relationships not vertical ones. God can take a life for any reason. You...
I am indeed primarily using it in the liberty sense. Laws can only recognize rights (or infringe them). They do not create them.
IF the law tomorrow gave me the legal right to die, it didn't...
Actually breathing air is a right since you need air to live and if someone deprives you of that, they are guilty of trying to kill you.
I think you are the one skipping pretty merrily.
I do since I use social media in my role as Communications Director - the actual thing is pretty compelling.
But then again some people think the "Piss Jesus" was compelling. I don't. But they...
It is a tangible connection. People react to that. Further, I don't have to justify why I prefer a certain method of expressing my free speech.
I didn't suggest you were.
Thank you Sea that means a great deal to me.
So much win.