-
August 28th 2007, 01:36 AM #1
Is it true you actually shun and disfellowship your members for their wrong actions?
Because if that is true then arent you going agianst the very scripture you teach about love and God being the judge not us. Because i am pretty sure in my translation and yours 1 corinthians 13 doesnt say anything like love is patient and love is kind only when others decide to change and act like us. So if this is your practice can you please give me the scripture to back it up in the NWT.
-
August 28th 2007, 03:39 AM #2
Re: Is it true you actually shun and disfellowship your members for their wrong actions?
You don't shun them. You simply refuse to associate with that person as a brother or sister in Christ if they refuse to turn from certain dangerous behaviors. If they are a biological relative or a fellow employee, you still associate with them as such. There's also nothing in the Bible against judging in general -- only against judging hypocritically. And there's nothing unloving about it.
Here I am! 
-
August 28th 2007, 03:45 AM #3
Re: Is it true you actually shun and disfellowship your members for their wrong actions?
Huh, LS - JWs aren't even supposed to say hello to disfellowshipped JWs.
Tektonics Research - All content, no jokes.
-
August 28th 2007, 04:11 AM #4
Re: Is it true you actually shun and disfellowship your members for their wrong actions?
I'm no JW, nor a big fan of their theology, but have you read I Cor 5 1:12 in your own Bible?
I don't even begin to claim I understand everything about the JW's practices, but I knew a couple of them pretty well, and my understanding is that when someone who has been disfellowshipped repents that they are permitted back into assembly. I'm hoping some JWs will correct me if I'm wrong because I'd like to understand this.
While I don't agree with the majority of the reasons they disfellowship people for and a great many of their other practices and beliefs, I can see a scriptural basis for any church to put the blatantly unrepentant out of assembly.
1 Cor 5 and 1 Cor 13 are by the same author and found within the same book. I don't personally belive Paul to be schizophrenic. I think that Paul is saying that you are to be patient, kind, etc, but you have to draw the line somewhere--some exceptionally wicked and continued practices aren't to be tolerated.
Is your objection to disfellowshipping that they actually draw a line and say that there are some things that they will not tolerate within their church assembly, or is it to where and how that line is drawn? Mine is the latter, but yours seems to be with any church which would ever put a person out of their assembly because it is not loving or patient or kind to do so.Last edited by Crow; August 28th 2007 at 04:26 AM.
I have been honored as an Enemy of Nee™ and LAu Tzu hasn't!
"You are banned. You are not a Christian for Christians don't accuse brothers and sisters in Christ of being non-Christian." --Troy Brooks
-
August 28th 2007, 04:15 AM #5
-
August 28th 2007, 04:23 AM #6
-
August 28th 2007, 11:47 AM #7
Re: Is it true you actually shun and disfellowship your members for their wrong actions?
The Reverend Earl Curtmudgeon the Sanguine of Frogging over Womble. (Peculiar Titles)
Thanx, JPH, for the avatar. Thanx, Muz, for the new tag-line. Thanx, Kelp, for the AotM nomination.
-
September 1st 2007, 01:31 AM #8
Re: Is it true you actually shun and disfellowship your members for their wrong actions?
"Years ago, I mean decades ago, I read a quote about politicians performing quid pro quo favors for campaign cash, and whether or not we could prove it. The guy who was quoted opined that it was difficult to determine. He noted that in many cases, the payoff might not take the form of votes on legislative action -- those might be detectable, and so are avoided -- but could take subtler forms, like the question that is never asked at a hearing.
The media's doing a terrific job of not asking questions it doesn't want to know the answer to. It doesn't ask these questions in bulk, and the great volume of questions it doesn't ask makes it cheap to not ask questions.
And it passes these savings on to you, the customer." Ace
-
September 1st 2007, 01:32 AM #9
Re: Is it true you actually shun and disfellowship your members for their wrong actions?
Okay. ::burns Darth::
Tektonics Research - All content, no jokes.
-
-
September 3rd 2007, 08:45 AM #10
Re: Is it true you actually shun and disfellowship your members for their wrong actions?
*Burns Punkish*
-
September 3rd 2007, 09:21 AM #11
Re: Is it true you actually shun and disfellowship your members for their wrong actions?
Ow, that tickles!
Tektonics Research - All content, no jokes.
-
March 29th 2009, 11:29 AM #12
Re: Is it true you actually shun and disfellowship your members for their wrong actions?
I hope I'm replying to the comment I meant to. Sorry, I'm new to this (old school!). Yes, it's true that JWs 'shun' those who are disfellowshiped (but they do not use that term) and they can only disfellowship persons who have been baptized into their organization. If you were never baptized and associated with them for however long, and you do something they consider 'sinful', i.e. smoking, attending a church, fornication, adultery, they would not be able to get up in front of the whole Kingdom Hall and announce that you had done 'whatever' to be disfellowshiped and to be 'not associated with'.
It doesn't matter if you have repented before God or not, it matters whether or not you continue to believe their doctrine and claim that; and prove that for a period of time, by attending their meetings (and while attending, not being able to talk with people there, or have them talk with you!) and meeting with their elders. If they deem that you are sincere by all of this action, then they will reinstate you, but only under the conditions that you do not attend any 'church' but theirs, and only believe their doctrines.
Similar Threads
-
Outrageous Pelosi Quote wrong wrong wrong
By JusticeMachine in forum Civics 101Replies: 3Last Post: March 11th 2010, 10:38 AM -
Actions of Principles in Ethics
By Tickle Me Mercury in forum Philosophy 201Replies: 1Last Post: April 11th 2008, 05:41 PM -
Words and Actions you L-O-V-E love
By Beanieboy in forum LobbyReplies: 21Last Post: January 18th 2006, 04:45 PM -
Men’s Actions, Both Free & And Determined.
By Chappie in forum Theology 201Replies: 101Last Post: August 31st 2005, 09:43 AM















































































Quote

Oh, oops. I didn't realize this was in the JW section. This is me . . . backing out slowly . . . or not so slowly.
LittleShepherd, hey it's no problem.


Revelation was written during...
Yesterday, 08:17 PM in Eschatology 201