Court Ruling: A person cannot be forced to attend religous rehab

  • Aggressive
  • Amazed
  • Amused
  • Angelic
  • Angry
  • Artistic
  • Asleep
  • Bashful
  • Blah
  • Bored
  • Breezy
  • Brooding
  • Busy
  • Buzzed
  • Chatty
  • Cheeky
  • Cheerful
  • Cloud 9
  • Cold
  • Cold Turkey
  • Confused
  • Cool
  • Crappy
  • Curious
  • Cynical
  • Daring
  • Dead
  • Depressed
  • Devilish
  • Doh
  • Doubtful
  • Drunk
  • Energetic
  • Fiendish
  • Fine
  • Flirty
  • Gloomy
  • Goofy
  • Grumpy
  • Happy
  • Hot
  • Hung Over
  • In Love
  • In Pain
  • Innocent
  • Inspired
  • Lonely
  • Lurking
  • Mellow
  • Mischievious
  • Nerdy
  • None
  • Not Worthy
  • Paranoid
  • Pensive
  • Psychedelic
  • Question
  • Relaxed
  • ROFLMAO
  • Sad
  • Scared
  • Shocked
  • Sick
  • Sleepy
  • Sneaky
  • Snobbish
  • Spaced
  • Stressed
  • Sunshine
  • Sweet Tooth
  • Thinking
  • Tired
  • Twisted
  • Vegged Out
  • Worried
  • Yee Haw
  • Results 1 to 2 of 2
    1. #1
      Conductor42's Avatar
      Conductor42 is offline Detective
      ---
       
      Join Date
      October 10th, 2003
      Posts
      12,647
      Male - Jedi
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Court Ruling: A person cannot be forced to attend religous rehab

      Good. While I can understand a court requiring a person to attend rehab or whatnot, they shouldn't be forced to attend one of a paticular religious orientation if they don't accept that view.

      Like the court, I've also got nothing against AA - it is a fine program indeed.

      News: San Fransisco Gate


      Alcoholics Anonymous, the renowned 12-step program that directs problem drinkers to seek help from a higher power, says it's not a religion and is open to nonbelievers. But it has enough religious overtones that a parolee can't be ordered to attend its meetings as a condition of staying out of prison, a federal appeals court ruled Friday.
      [...]
      Rulings from across the nation since 1996 have established that "requiring a parolee to attend religion-based treatment programs violates the First Amendment," the court said. "While we in no way denigrate the fine work of (Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous), attendance in their programs may not be coerced by the state."

      © source where applicable



      http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg.../BA99S1AKQ.DTL


      And here's the 12 AA steps, FYI (it seems reasonable enough)
      1. We admitted we were powerless over alcohol–that our lives had become unmanageable.


      2. Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.


      3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.


      4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.


      5. Admitted to God, to ourselves and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.


      6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.


      7. Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.


      8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all.


      9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.


      10. Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it.


      11. Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God, as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.


      12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics, and to practice these principles in all our affairs.
      "Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose.
      You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart." — Steve Jobs

    2. #2
      Minnesota's Avatar
      Minnesota is offline TWebber
      ---
       
      Join Date
      April 13th, 2003
      Location
      Minnesota
      Posts
      9,323
      Male - Agnostic
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: Court Ruling: A person cannot be forced to attend religous rehab

      And good for the appeals court.

      "A federal judge dismissed the suit, saying officers are required to pay damages for violating constitutional rights only when those rights are already clearly established.

      But the appeals court said Nanamori should have known in 2001 that coerced participation in a religion-based program was unconstitutional because eight state and federal courts had ruled on the issue by then and all had agreed that a parolee has a right to be assigned to a secular treatment program."

    Similar Threads

    1. Bush Abuses Presidency To Skirt Federal Court Ruling
      By Minnesota in forum Civics 101
      Replies: 15
      Last Post: August 17th 2006, 12:05 PM
    2. Replies: 21
      Last Post: November 6th 2005, 10:50 PM
    3. Pagans incensed by court Ruling
      By Cu Mhorrigan in forum Civics 101
      Replies: 7
      Last Post: May 31st 2005, 09:22 PM
    4. Candidate for the stupidest court ruling EVER
      By The Laughing Man in forum Civics 101
      Replies: 55
      Last Post: May 2nd 2005, 01:51 AM
    5. Huge Supreme Court ruling!
      By Jimmy Higgins in forum Civics 101
      Replies: 5
      Last Post: June 29th 2004, 01:35 PM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •