My Understanding

  • Aggressive
  • Amazed
  • Amused
  • Angelic
  • Angry
  • Artistic
  • Asleep
  • Bashful
  • Blah
  • Bored
  • Breezy
  • Brooding
  • Busy
  • Buzzed
  • Chatty
  • Cheeky
  • Cheerful
  • Cloud 9
  • Cold
  • Cold Turkey
  • Confused
  • Cool
  • Crappy
  • Curious
  • Cynical
  • Daring
  • Dead
  • Depressed
  • Devilish
  • Doh
  • Doubtful
  • Drunk
  • Energetic
  • Fiendish
  • Fine
  • Flirty
  • Gloomy
  • Goofy
  • Grumpy
  • Happy
  • Hot
  • Hung Over
  • In Love
  • In Pain
  • Innocent
  • Inspired
  • Lonely
  • Lurking
  • Mellow
  • Mischievious
  • Nerdy
  • None
  • Not Worthy
  • Paranoid
  • Pensive
  • Psychedelic
  • Question
  • Relaxed
  • ROFLMAO
  • Sad
  • Scared
  • Shocked
  • Sick
  • Sleepy
  • Sneaky
  • Snobbish
  • Spaced
  • Stressed
  • Sunshine
  • Sweet Tooth
  • Thinking
  • Tired
  • Twisted
  • Vegged Out
  • Worried
  • Yee Haw
  • Results 1 to 9 of 9
    1. #1
      Jonathan Rowe's Avatar
      Jonathan Rowe is offline Undergraduate
      ---
       
      Join Date
      October 27th, 2007
      Posts
      2
      Male - Agnostic
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      My Understanding

      Hello All,

      Perhaps I can shed some light on the Deist v. Christian questions you raised here. This comes after years of meticulous research. The notable Founding Fathers were not, as the secular left oft-argues "Deists" as strictly defined (Thomas Paine and Ethan Allen were such). However, they were not "Christians" as evangelicals and Catholics understand the term either. Rather, their beliefs were somewhere in between the two systems, with "rationalism" as the trumping element. Gordon Wood, when I saw him speak, defined it as "proto-unitarianism." The term I opt for is "theistic rationalism."

      The key Founders to whom I refer are Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, and a few others. Contra strict Deists, they believed in an active interventionist God, one to whom men ought to pray. And they were more likely to call their system of belief "Christianity," not "Deism." However, this system of "Christianity" (if it's even fair to term it that) was unitarian (meaning it disbelieved in the Trinity or that Jesus was fully God) universalist (it believed in salvation for everyone) syncretist (it believed most or all religions, including Hinduism and ISLAM were valid ways to God) and rationalist (meaning it believed man's reason superseded revelation and in fact determined which parts of the Bible were legitimately revealed by God).

      For all of my meticulous research on the matter check out my websites http://jonrowe.blogspot.com and http://positiveliberty.com.

    2. The following tWebber says Amen to Jonathan Rowe for this useful Post:


    3. #2
      Clarice's Avatar
      Clarice is offline Banned
      ---
       
      Join Date
      April 18th, 2005
      Posts
      399
      Female - Christian (other)
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: My Understanding

      Quote Originally posted by Jonathan Rowe View Post
      Hello All,

      Perhaps I can shed some light on the Deist v. Christian questions you raised here. This comes after years of meticulous research. The notable Founding Fathers were not, as the secular left oft-argues "Deists" as strictly defined (Thomas Paine and Ethan Allen were such). However, they were not "Christians" as evangelicals and Catholics understand the term either. Rather, their beliefs were somewhere in between the two systems, with "rationalism" as the trumping element. Gordon Wood, when I saw him speak, defined it as "proto-unitarianism." The term I opt for is "theistic rationalism."

      The key Founders to whom I refer are Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, and a few others. Contra strict Deists, they believed in an active interventionist God, one to whom men ought to pray. And they were more likely to call their system of belief "Christianity," not "Deism." However, this system of "Christianity" (if it's even fair to term it that) was unitarian (meaning it disbelieved in the Trinity or that Jesus was fully God) universalist (it believed in salvation for everyone) syncretist (it believed most or all religions, including Hinduism and ISLAM were valid ways to God) and rationalist (meaning it believed man's reason superseded revelation and in fact determined which parts of the Bible were legitimately revealed by God).

      For all of my meticulous research on the matter check out my websites http://jonrowe.blogspot.com and http://positiveliberty.com.
      Being a fan and student of history, I appreciate this post, Jonathan.

      Often words and events are taken out of context, to piece together a picture supporting one's pre-suppositions - such as been the case with the premise that conservative Christianity is the religion of the founding fathers, this country then belonging to those of today who hold to such a philosophy.

      Thank you again, and welcome to Tweb.



      Clarice

    4. #3
      Jonathan Rowe's Avatar
      Jonathan Rowe is offline Undergraduate
      ---
       
      Join Date
      October 27th, 2007
      Posts
      2
      Male - Agnostic
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: My Understanding

      My pleasure!

    5. #4
      SteveF's Avatar
      SteveF is offline Pollen person
      ---
       
      Join Date
      January 30th, 2004
      Location
      Old London town
      Posts
      6,342
      Male - Atheist
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: My Understanding

      Hi Jonathan, welcome to TWeb. I've read some of your articles, via Ed Brayton, and am looking forward to seeing your contributions here.
      "To see a world in a grain of sand,
      And a heaven in a wild flower
      Hold infinity in the palm of your hand,
      And eternity in an hour"

      William Blake

    6. #5
      Amazing Rando's Avatar
      Amazing Rando is offline Pledge allegiance to the Lamb
      ---
       
      Join Date
      May 21st, 2003
      Location
      Newtown, PA
      Posts
      11,297
      Male - Amish
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: My Understanding

      Quote Originally posted by Jonathan Rowe View Post
      Hello All,

      Perhaps I can shed some light on the Deist v. Christian questions you raised here. This comes after years of meticulous research. The notable Founding Fathers were not, as the secular left oft-argues "Deists" as strictly defined (Thomas Paine and Ethan Allen were such). However, they were not "Christians" as evangelicals and Catholics understand the term either. Rather, their beliefs were somewhere in between the two systems, with "rationalism" as the trumping element. Gordon Wood, when I saw him speak, defined it as "proto-unitarianism." The term I opt for is "theistic rationalism."

      The key Founders to whom I refer are Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, and a few others. Contra strict Deists, they believed in an active interventionist God, one to whom men ought to pray. And they were more likely to call their system of belief "Christianity," not "Deism." However, this system of "Christianity" (if it's even fair to term it that) was unitarian (meaning it disbelieved in the Trinity or that Jesus was fully God) universalist (it believed in salvation for everyone) syncretist (it believed most or all religions, including Hinduism and ISLAM were valid ways to God) and rationalist (meaning it believed man's reason superseded revelation and in fact determined which parts of the Bible were legitimately revealed by God).

      For all of my meticulous research on the matter check out my websites http://jonrowe.blogspot.com and http://positiveliberty.com.
      Wow, imagine that- an issue that's not black and white! Well said.
      If there is anything I’ve learned from both conservatives and liberals, it’s that we can have all the “right” answers and still be mean. And when you’re mean, it’s hard for people to listen to, much less desire, your truth.

      -Shane Claiborne

    7. #6
      Ratnat's Avatar
      Ratnat is offline tWebber
      ---
       
      Join Date
      October 5th, 2007
      Location
      New England
      Posts
      658
      Female - Atheist
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: My Understanding

      Quote Originally posted by Jonathan Rowe View Post
      Hello All,

      Perhaps I can shed some light on the Deist v. Christian questions you raised here. This comes after years of meticulous research. The notable Founding Fathers were not, as the secular left oft-argues "Deists" as strictly defined (Thomas Paine and Ethan Allen were such). However, they were not "Christians" as evangelicals and Catholics understand the term either. Rather, their beliefs were somewhere in between the two systems, with "rationalism" as the trumping element. Gordon Wood, when I saw him speak, defined it as "proto-unitarianism." The term I opt for is "theistic rationalism."

      The key Founders to whom I refer are Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, and a few others. Contra strict Deists, they believed in an active interventionist God, one to whom men ought to pray. And they were more likely to call their system of belief "Christianity," not "Deism." However, this system of "Christianity" (if it's even fair to term it that) was unitarian (meaning it disbelieved in the Trinity or that Jesus was fully God) universalist (it believed in salvation for everyone) syncretist (it believed most or all religions, including Hinduism and ISLAM were valid ways to God) and rationalist (meaning it believed man's reason superseded revelation and in fact determined which parts of the Bible were legitimately revealed by God).

      For all of my meticulous research on the matter check out my websites http://jonrowe.blogspot.com and http://positiveliberty.com.
      Excellent blog and post.

      Everybody seems to want the Founders in their camp.lol

      There are way too many labels and sub-labels in use today to simply paste one on a historical figure. I also think too many use 50+ years of writing by an individual and pick out what agrees with their position.

      In my less than half a century life, I personally have been a devout Christian, Unitarian Universalist, Deist, Atheist. I have to wonder what label I would be given 100 yrs from now based on my affiliations and writings.lol

    8. #7
      Paintbucket's Avatar
      Paintbucket is offline Lurker?
      ---
       
      Join Date
      November 2nd, 2007
      Location
      Appalachia
      Posts
      494
      Male - Unsure
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: My Understanding

      Good stuff, I learned quite a bit in reading this.

    9. #8
      Tladatsi's Avatar
      Tladatsi is offline Summa Cum Laude
      ---
       
      Join Date
      October 18th, 2005
      Posts
      2,527
      Male - Zoroastrianism
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: My Understanding

      Hello,

      So why the interest in the faith of the founding fathers?

      Quote Originally posted by Jonathan Rowe View Post
      Hello All,

      Perhaps I can shed some light on the Deist v. Christian questions you raised here. This comes after years of meticulous research. The notable Founding Fathers were not, as the secular left oft-argues "Deists" as strictly defined (Thomas Paine and Ethan Allen were such). However, they were not "Christians" as evangelicals and Catholics understand the term either. Rather, their beliefs were somewhere in between the two systems, with "rationalism" as the trumping element. Gordon Wood, when I saw him speak, defined it as "proto-unitarianism." The term I opt for is "theistic rationalism."

      The key Founders to whom I refer are Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Franklin, and a few others. Contra strict Deists, they believed in an active interventionist God, one to whom men ought to pray. And they were more likely to call their system of belief "Christianity," not "Deism." However, this system of "Christianity" (if it's even fair to term it that) was unitarian (meaning it disbelieved in the Trinity or that Jesus was fully God) universalist (it believed in salvation for everyone) syncretist (it believed most or all religions, including Hinduism and ISLAM were valid ways to God) and rationalist (meaning it believed man's reason superseded revelation and in fact determined which parts of the Bible were legitimately revealed by God).

      For all of my meticulous research on the matter check out my websites http://jonrowe.blogspot.com and http://positiveliberty.com.

    10. #9
      Whipartist's Avatar
      Whipartist is offline Stone Slinger
      ---
       
      Join Date
      October 26th, 2003
      Location
      California
      Posts
      876
      Male - Christian
      Mentioned
      0 Post(s)

      Re: My Understanding

      Good thoughts Jonathan, I'm going to check out those links. I remember listening to the lithany of "Reclaiming America For Christ" styled radio broadcast on Christian radio when I was in highschool and getting so sick of it all.

      I came to the conclusion that the Revolutionary War was not Biblical and that founding father worship was a Christian cult, so to speak. Great point.

      More recently I've learned about the occultic involvement that some of the founding fathers had and it's becoming clearer all the time.
      "Surely goodness and lovingkindness will follow me all the days of my life, and I will dwell in the house of the LORD forever."

      May God bless you in this way aswell.

      Benjamin

    Similar Threads

    1. Understanding Life, is a lead to Understanding God.
      By mickiel in forum Unorthodox Theology 201
      Replies: 35
      Last Post: December 7th 2011, 12:51 PM
    2. Help with Understanding.
      By Theostudent in forum Theology 201
      Replies: 4
      Last Post: May 22nd 2007, 04:20 PM
    3. The key to understanding women!
      By Jade in forum Rec Room
      Replies: 44
      Last Post: January 29th 2006, 05:58 PM
    4. Understanding Jesus as God...
      By k4cym in forum JW - Watchtower Society
      Replies: 18
      Last Post: November 25th 2005, 01:19 AM
    5. Understanding Providence
      By D.R.R. in forum The Pulpit
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: August 18th 2004, 12:03 PM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •