-
November 29th 2007, 04:46 PM #1
How wacky ideas become scientific
By rigorous testing and experimentation. Creationists, take note: wacky ideas can make progress - but not without doing the hard work.
Graveyard shift linked to cancer risk
Scientists suspect flipping body's light-dark cycle leaves workers vulnerable
LONDON - It was once scientific heresy to suggest that smoking contributed to lung cancer. Now, another idea initially dismissed as nutty is gaining acceptance: the graveyard shift might increase your cancer risk.Next month, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the cancer arm of the World Health Organization, will classify shift work as a "probable" carcinogen.
That will put shift work in the same category as cancer-causing agents like anabolic steroids, ultraviolet radiation, and diesel engine exhaustOf the chief parts of the Ruling Passion, only this can be truly said: Hate has a reason for everything. But love is unreasonable.
(V. Raiuhes Ahaefvthe)
-
November 29th 2007, 06:55 PM #2
Re: How wacky ideas become scientific
This idea doesn't seem nutty to me at all. I've known people who worked night shifts and I certainly didn't need any rigorous scientific testing to suggest it wasn't a particularly healthy way of life. Still, if the idea has now gained credence perhaps something positive can be done to address the issue.
Fascinating stuff - thanks for the post.
-
November 29th 2007, 07:03 PM #3
Re: How wacky ideas become scientific
I'll print this off and hang it up at work tonight. Then I'll email it to all my fellow shift workers
Thanks for the link!
-
November 30th 2007, 02:26 AM #4
Re: How wacky ideas become scientific
The mainstream is notorious for accepting whacky ideas. Even if it has to be dragged into acceptance, it will - sooner or later, providing those with the wacky ideas can muster a good enough argument and stick to their guns.
However, "you will burn in hell if you do not accept my idea" is not counted among the good arguments - not in any natural science at least. And sticking to your guns is no guarantee of success - the idea may, in truth, be wacky. And in that case, "you will burn in hell if you do not accept my idea" only reinforces the notion that the idea really is wacky.
Regards, Rolandrjw
-
November 30th 2007, 09:18 AM #5
Re: How wacky ideas become scientific
"Though He slay me, yet will I trust in Him." Job 13:15
"Choice trumps knowledge" JAF
Macroevolution: Unmitigated extrapolation coupled with unrestrained imagination generously sprinkled with wishful desires.
Macroevolution: If you don't think about it, it makes a lot of sense.
Similar Threads
-
Theological ideas vs Scientific ideas - I
By wattsr1 in forum Natural Science 301Replies: 8Last Post: October 27th 2007, 05:23 PM -
Theological Ideas vs Scientific Ideas - II
By wattsr1 in forum Natural Science 301Replies: 2Last Post: October 26th 2007, 06:55 PM -
more wacky ideas
By shadowman in forum General Theistics 101Replies: 18Last Post: November 24th 2006, 06:26 PM -
Wacky Defs.
By Gudatmath in forum Game RoomReplies: 3Last Post: July 18th 2005, 05:36 PM -
I'm in a really wacky mood today.
By Pinky Pie of Doom in forum Rec RoomReplies: 8Last Post: July 16th 2004, 06:43 PM















































































Quote



Don't blame your Church for bad...
Today, 03:55 AM in Theology 201