What we have here is a failure to agree on the definition.
Announcement
Collapse
Economics 301 Guidelines
This is the area where economic theories and trends are discussed.
Balance your checkbook before participating.
Forum Rules: Here
Balance your checkbook before participating.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Bitcoin versus other monies.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Truthseeker View PostWhat we have here is a failure to agree on the definition.
Comment
-
Finally Michael Robinson had something to say about the decision by the IRS to tax transactions that involve Bitcoin like a stock being sold for cash. He's not selling his Bitcoin hoard, he says. He IS unhappy about that decision, calling it "nothing short of a sham."
He suggested what I had suggested before, that someone will do an app that keeps track of all one's Bitcoin transactions.
I'm not sure I understand. Let me give an example. Sparko buys a pirate flag for x bitcoins (x can be a fraction, like 0.11). At that time a Bitcoin exchange values a bitcoin at $y. Before that time, he had purchased his only hoard with $z dollars, where z is less than y (thus, it is a capital gain).
The transaction is taxed as follows, where t is the tax rate (like 15%) that is applicable to the transaction:
tax = t*(y-z)*x [in dollars]
A numerical example: t = 0.2, y = 405, z = 300, x = 12.11
then tax = $254.31
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparko View Postwell anything COULD be considered money, I can trade goods with you to buy things for instance.Or I can make up some arbitrary object to give you, that only exists in cyberspace, and you could call it money if you want to. But I think that in the case of bitcoins, no government recognizes them as legal tender,yet they do have worth.And that worth goes up and down a lot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Paprika View PostWhat is money, but a convention?Durable, portable, divisible, intrinsically valuable.Regarding the last criterion, he was wrong about value existing independently from anyone's mind: Value is subjective. Say 99% of the world desire bitcoins. Then 1% do not value them even if they know about them. Otherwise, the Austrian School of Economics agree on the first 3 criteria. Clearly money is supposed to be a physical thing, such as a gold bar or platinum coin. Mere convention is not physical. Like value it has no independent existence outside our minds.
I would concede that bitcoins are less physical in some sense. Nevertheless if they are used more and more in commerce, they would be more and more useful.
I guess I should mention that Jeff D. Opdyke thinks Bitcoin is no more than a fad.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Truthseeker View PostClearly money is supposed to be a physical thing, such as a gold bar or platinum coin.
You would have to prove Aristotle wrong. He gave criteria that money should meet:
Durable, portable, divisible, intrinsically valuable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Truthseeker View PostMichael Robinson admitted that Bitcoin fell ~18% in April 10, but he pointed out that since then exchange rates appear to have stabilized, trading between a weighted average of $458 and $529. He suggested that could be building a long-term solid foundation. Wishful thinking?
Comment
-
Bit-coins values seems to be fluctuating a bit due to the closure of Coin/Currency Exchanges."It's evolution; every time you invent something fool-proof, the world invents a better fool."
-Unknown
"Preach the gospel, and if necessary use words." - Most likely St.Francis
I find that evolution is the best proof of God.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I support the :
sigpic
Comment
-
The USG's ability to create money out of thin air means that it does not need to tax us and hold bond sales. That is so as long as there are still sellers willing to take dollars. Take the Chinese for example. Through the years China gained a huge amount of dollars that people refer to as US debt. That's not the correct way to view things. The US owes China nothing! Again, as long as sellers are willing to take dollars, the USG can roll over its "debt" indefinitely.
That state of affairs should be intolerable--unless the USG is truly doing more good than bad with its fiat-money purchases. What if the rest of the world does think that the USG is doing more bad than good, and is shifting to other monetary systems?
That's why Bitcoin and other monies like that might have a ever-more important place in our future, as ever-more people glom on to what is really happening and try to change the state of affairs.
For a much longer discussion, grok here http://dailyreckoning.com/the-real-r...lar-has-value/
Comment
-
Bloomberg LP, data manager for financial-market players and media company, is now including real-time Bitcoin data. Wow. Another wow: Bill Gates likes that Bitcoin is allowing poor people make trades they couldn't before because of low transaction costs. Third wow: Coinality.com is listing offers of jobs for those who want to be paid in bitcoins. [Thanks, Michael A. Robinson]
Comment
widgetinstance 221 (Related Threads) skipped due to lack of content & hide_module_if_empty option.
Comment