Originally posted by rwatts
View Post
A response is not the same as an answer. I said that I responded.
Yes, I did say that the answer to your question depends on the definition.
You "defined" it and I left it there because I haven't the disposition nor the time to educate you on the matter. These posts that I write take a few minutes. To bring you up to speed on what you are clearly lacking would take days/weeks. I'm sorry but that's the best I can do.
I will, however, leave you with this: all existing information theories --- Shannon, Algorithmic, Dembski ... and including our own Universal Information presented in Without Excuse, 2011 --- are both fine as they are but also "flawed" in some sense. Those "flaws" are the reason why questions involving 'information' remain intractable and/or unsolved.
Jorge
Comment