Originally posted by oxmixmudd
View Post
Wrong - I'm waiting to see what you've got. Your track record (e.g. Asteroid impacts can be explained by steam explosions) is just very,very poor.
In the opinion of O-Mudd -- who is extremely prejudiced against Biblical Creationism and particularly against Jorge -- "Jorge's track record is very, very poor".
But I am well aware of the fact it is possible for a YEC to do groundbreaking research in any area that does not involve the Age of some aspect of the universe. It's not intelligence that is the problem. It is your commitment to not seeing the obvious in that area that is the problem. Where that comes into play here is that you have an agenda. You want to prove that life can't have evolved naturally. So your 'work' on information is targeting that conclusion. That alone likely* has undone any potential you have in terms of natural intellectual gifts to accomplish something in this arena.
*unless, of course, that conclusion is the correct conclusion. Though, truth be told, research that targets a goal can be spoiled by that bias - EVEN IF ITS THE RIGHT CONCLUSION.
*unless, of course, that conclusion is the correct conclusion. Though, truth be told, research that targets a goal can be spoiled by that bias - EVEN IF ITS THE RIGHT CONCLUSION.
I have no such predjudice Jorge. I have only evaluated what you have presented. Like asteroid impacts craters can be explained by steam explosions. Or that stars are not forming, or that planets aren't forming, or that sea salt can be used as evidence the Earth is not 4.5 billion years old. As I said above, your track record is just abysmally poor.
I also heard that Santa Claus beats the elves with Snow White's purse.
I'm not a physician Jorge. And you ARE just so full of yourself.
Even an obvious inference as this one isn't acknowledged - you HAVE to contort things to fit your agenda.
How about this one: kettle, stop trying to call the pot "black"! Think you can handle that one in an honest manner?
Jorge
Comment