Geisler on DJ's book

[Doubting John]

Please John, stop saying this, JP does not "pour gas on the flames of your passion", JP defend his positions in manner he agrees with, you on the other hand, seem obsessed with him, just drop it man, get on with your life, if you have not found the truth, keep seeking, do not waste your time "debunking" something you already found to be untrue, it is a waste of time.

As I asked earlier, are you concerned that Holding inspires skeptics like Matthew and me or not? Is anyone there concerned? They should be. I would think that even Holding's friends should criticize him for this, if they were truly his friends and if they really cared about the gospel and the saving of souls.

I'm telling you that he does inspire me and I said why he does.

As far as getting on with my life goes. I am. I'm enjoying life very much. I could just as easily say to Holding and crew to get on with their lives too, now that they've found satisfying answers to their questions, right? But they don't! So why should I do differently?

But the truth is that just like Dr. Avalos who said that since he has all of this knowledge about the Bible he's chosen to use it to debunk the Bible, so also it is with me and my meager amount of knowledge compared to him. I mean really, I spend about two decades learning what I know, so why not use it? It's that which I know. And since few skeptics do what Avalos and I are doing, based on the advice you just gave me, someone's got to do it. Why not me? It's the thing I know best.

[historic salve]

As I asked earlier, are you concerned that Holding inspires skeptics like Matthew and me or not? Is anyone there concerned? They should be. I would think that even Holding's friends should criticize him for this, if they were truly his friends and if they really cared about the gospel and the saving of souls.

I don't think anyone here is concerned that you and your friends are stirring the grease pots, DJ.

[Theostudent]

As I asked earlier, are you concerned that Holding inspires skeptics like Matthew and me or not? Is anyone there concerned? They should be. I would think that even Holding's friends should criticize him for this, if they were truly his friends and if they really cared about the gospel and the saving of souls.

Dude, I am not concerned with anyone who bases their decisions on something as mundane as "I do not like you foolerz,! so I shall waste my time sending people to hell!, if it exists of course!"

I'm telling you that he does inspire me and I said why he does.

Dude, get a life!

As far as getting on with my life goes. I am. I'm enjoying life very much. I could just as easily say to Holding and crew to get on with their lives too, now that they've found satisfying answers to their questions, right? But they don't! So why should I do differently?

Dude, you are the one that comes here talking crap, they are just here discussing their opinions, why do you care again?

But the truth is that just like Dr. Avalos who said that since he has all of this knowledge about the Bible he's chosen to use it to debunk the Bible, so also it is with me and my meager amount of knowledge compared to him. I mean really, I spend about two decades learning what I know, so why not use it?

Yeah, exactly, use it for something useful, like finding the truth.............

It's that which I know. And since few skeptics do what Avalos and I are doing, based on the advice you just gave me, someone's got to do it. Why not me? It's the thing I know best.

someone has to do what? tell people they can not hold a belief? Get off yourself.

[Tophet]

Hey, it's my doubting friend John!

As far as getting on with my life goes. I am. I'm enjoying life very much.

Are you gainfully employed yet? What are you doing for a living?

[Theostudent]

Are you gainfully employed yet? What are you doing for a living?

No need to be rude Tophet.

[Tophet]

No need to be rude Tophet.

I'm not rude. These are legitimate questions for my good buddy.

[Dee Dee Warren]

No need to be rude Tophet.

No need to be a hall monitor theostudent.

[Theostudent]

I'm not rude. These are legitimate questions for my good buddy.

Cary on then, if John is truly your "good buddy".

[Dee Dee Warren]

I'm not rude. These are legitimate questions for my good buddy.

I would ask how monogamy is going these days.

[Theostudent]

No need to be a hall monitor theostudent.

I like monitoring the halls.

[Theostudent]

I would ask how monogamy is going these days.

I guess Xena has no Sin.

[Dee Dee Warren]

Why not me? It's the thing I know best.

Yet do so poorly.

You don't have gills! Therefore there is no God!

[historic salve]

Yet do so poorly.

You don't have gills! Therefore there is no God!

Don't forget "it rains, therefore there is no God."

[Theostudent]

You don't have gills! Therefore there is no God!

that one is bad, but think of the one I extrapolated from LGM.

"Poop exists, therefore, God does not exist!"

haha

[Dee Dee Warren]

I guess Xena has no Sin.

I would guess you don't either since you think you can point out something you think I am doing wrong. Thank you for your instruction on how to poorly interpret the bible.

Yes, monogamy has gone very well for me for over twenty years, thank you very much.