Announcement

Collapse

Christianity 201 Guidelines

orthodox Christians only.

Discussion on matters of general mainstream evangelical Christian theology that do not fit within Theology 201. Have some spiritual gifts ceased today? Is the KJV the only viable translation for the church today? In what sense are the books of the bible inspired and what are those books? Church government? Modern day prophets and apostles?

This forum is primarily for Christians to discuss matters of Christian doctrine, and is not the area for debate between atheists (or those opposing orthodox Christianity) and Christians. Inquiring atheists (or sincere seekers/doubters/unorthodox) seeking only Christian participation and having demonstrated a manner that does not seek to undermine the orthodox Christian faith of others are also welcome, but must seek Moderator permission first. When defining “Christian” or "orthodox" for purposes of this section, we mean persons holding to the core essentials of the historic Christian faith such as the Trinity, the Creatorship of God, the virgin birth, the bodily resurrection of Christ, the atonement, the future bodily return of Christ, the future bodily resurrection of the just and the unjust, and the final judgment. Persons not holding to these core doctrines are welcome to participate in the Comparative Religions section without restriction, in Theology 201 as regards to the nature of God and salvation with limited restrictions, and in Christology for issues surrounding the person of Christ and the Trinity. Atheists are welcome to discuss and debate these issues in the Apologetics 301 forum without such restrictions.

Additionally and rarely, there may be some topics or lines of discussion that within the Moderator's discretion fall so outside the bounds of mainstream orthodox doctrine (in general Christian circles or in the TheologyWeb community) or that deny certain core values that are the Christian convictions of forum leadership that may be more appropriately placed within Unorthodox Theology 201. NO personal offense should be taken by such discretionary decision for none is intended. While inerrancy is NOT considered a requirement for posting in this section, a general respect for the Bible text and a respect for the inerrantist position of others is requested.

The Tweb rules apply here like they do everywhere at Tweb, if you haven't read them, now would be a good time.

Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less

Pope says Christians should apologize for marginalization of gays

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Very well said, Leonhard.
    βλέπομεν γὰρ ἄρτι δι᾿ ἐσόπτρου ἐν αἰνίγματι, τότε δὲ πρόσωπον πρὸς πρόσωπον·
    ἄρτι γινώσκω ἐκ μέρους, τότε δὲ ἐπιγνώσομαι καθὼς καὶ ἐπεγνώσθην.

    אָכֵ֕ן אַתָּ֖ה אֵ֣ל מִסְתַּתֵּ֑ר אֱלֹהֵ֥י יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל מוֹשִֽׁיעַ׃

    Comment


    • Originally posted by KingsGambit View Post
      Everybody else ignored Obsidian's post earlier but it has been on my mind: How do we reconcile the general mindset of human dignity with the fact that the Bible did, in fact, call for stoning of gays at one point?
      The OT law on the execution of such people - and who exactly is envisaged, anyway ? - has no more authority for Christians than (say) the Middle Assyrian law on the subject. The OT laws are a very poor guide to *Christian* ethics, which is defined by Christ, not by an Ancient Near Eastern law code.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Darth Executor View Post
        It sure sounded like justice to God when He had them executed.

        BTW I know how hard it must be to do apologetics for this worthless motormouth pope,
        ## He is neither "worthless" nor a "motormouth" - a Godsend OTOH, most definitely.

        and I just want you to know that I'm enjoying every minute of it. Anti-catholic apologetics hasn't been this easy since the Borgias.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Obsidian View Post
          I agree with Darth Executor that the Pope makes a joke of the Catholic Church. However, I understand that the usual Catholic cop-out is that "The Pope is only infallible when he speaks ex cathedra," which of course the Pope never does, anyway. (So remind me of what the purpose is of even having a Pope?)
          ## The OP is very much mistaken. Far from making a joke of the CC, the HF is showing her how to be more Christian. No "cop-out" is needed. Popes speak ex cathedra fairly often - canonisations are an example, since on such occasions they speaks with the full exercise of their authority as Popes: when speaking ex cathedra they sometimes exercise infallibility, & sometimes do not.

          Not all acts of the man who is Pope are performed as Pope - he is not only Pope, he is also Bishop of Rome, and as such he is a priest. When he hears a confession, he does so as a priest.

          Not all Papal acts are of the same weight or force: when the Pope addresses a group of the Faithful in an audience, or gives his approval to a document of the SCDF, or divides or erects or suppresses a diocese, or visits a country, he is acting as Pope, but in different capacities. Papal approval of an addition to the Code of Canon Law is one thing - the canonisation of a Saint is something else. Both are Papal acts - but one is reversible, the other is not. Some Papal acts affect more people than others, because they are more public than others.
          Last edited by Rushing Jaws; 07-12-2016, 01:20 AM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Cow Poke View Post
            Then use the terms scripture uses.
            ## Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek ? Why ? The words of the text are less important than what they denote. The realities denoted by the words in the text, are more important than the words that denote them. "The terms Scripture uses" often have no exact equivalent in other cultures - it does not follow that presbyters in a US Church are not presbyters, because they are not old men. Do all councillors have to gather at city gates, because those in the OT are recorded as doing so ?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by robrecht View Post
              And lepers too. Don't forget to marginalize the lepers.
              And Gentiles. And Samaritans. And women with gonorrhoea and similar conditions. And demoniacs. And anyone else "unclean" or "accursed". In short, all the people whom Jesus did not marginalise, them or their modern equivalents.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Obsidian View Post
                You're just a fool who mocks God's word.
                What, by quoting stuff like: http://biblehub.com/matthew/5-22.htm ?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Obsidian View Post
                  Actually, he stood up for an unrepentant whore in John 8. The passage that Jesus was alluding to in that passage was Deuteronomy 17, where it says that the witnesses have to throw the first stone. So the moral of the story would be that even bad people are entitled to justice and fair procedures. I guess that includes homosexuals.

                  But the law should still require their execution, when proper proof is presented.
                  ## And Christians wonder that a lot of gay people don't find Christians attractive.... SMH

                  Comment


                  • So far nobody has explained to me what is being diluted of Christian teaching, in the Pope's message.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Rushing Jaws View Post
                      To question 1: Yes, most definitely. I am convinced that doing so cannot be separated from Jesus's preaching the Kingdom of God. But that Kingdom is foreshadowed and sketched in Psalm 72, which is drawn upon by both St Matthew & St Luke. The Righteousness & Peace of that Kingdom, the everlasting kingdom of the Son of Man Who is the Messiah-Son of David, cannot be confined to relations between God and man - it is grievously incomplete, even falsified, if it does not have its fullest effects in every way - but that includes letting it be made known in the form of identifying with the poor, the excluded, the despised, the hated. It cannot have limits, just as God's Love in Christ had no limits, but was shown by His Self-identification with crucified (therefore unclean & accursed) criminals.

                      2. No doubt of it. After the Orlando massacre, a pastor expressed regret that more gay people had not been killed. I found - and still find - this attitude horrifying, and not Christian at all. But one has to be watchful here - such a person is still one's brother in Christ. If the grace of Christ is a reality, one *cannot* say, ever,"I will stand with my gay brethren, but not with that pastor"; all are included in Christ's grace, however horrible their attitudes; it breaks down barriers.

                      The Church should be the first place where gay Christians - and anyone who is gay - find compassion (IOW, "suffering-with") and understanding. Their burdens, should be the Church's burdens. What they are or do, is beside the point. The Church's compassion has to include everyone - Freemasons, gay activists, abortionists, terrorists, paedophiles, the lot.

                      IMHO the Pope has shown great courage & graciousness in saying what he did. I totally agree with him. IMHO, far from undermining the Church's teaching (as some fear), he is living it, and thereby confirming it. I hope very much that he will get the Church even more completely involved with gay people - many of whom, after all, are or were Christians.

                      "But the Church will look stupid" - that doesn't matter; doing the Work of Christ in the Spirit of Christ, matters vastly. The Church has no way of calculating all possible results of seeking to model Christ in the world - she should just do the work He has given her, and let Him "worry" about the consequences.
                      So much amen!

                      Comment

                      Related Threads

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by Thoughtful Monk, 03-15-2024, 06:19 PM
                      35 responses
                      166 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post Cow Poke  
                      Started by KingsGambit, 03-15-2024, 02:12 PM
                      4 responses
                      49 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post Thoughtful Monk  
                      Started by Chaotic Void, 03-08-2024, 07:36 AM
                      10 responses
                      119 views
                      1 like
                      Last Post mikewhitney  
                      Started by Cow Poke, 02-29-2024, 07:55 AM
                      14 responses
                      71 views
                      3 likes
                      Last Post Cow Poke  
                      Started by Cow Poke, 02-28-2024, 11:56 AM
                      13 responses
                      59 views
                      0 likes
                      Last Post Cow Poke  
                      Working...
                      X