.
.
Even MORE [sigh] "non-existent" supporting evidence for Biblical Creationism. The "sigh" is because of the fanatical denials claiming "there is no evidence for Biblical Creationism" when the fact of the matter is that there is an abundance of supporting evidence. What IS lacking is the honesty of the deniers to admit that this abundant supporting evidence does in fact exist. Examples of that are plentiful right here on TWeb by ... well, let's not embarrass anyone by calling out their names. In any event, nothing can be done about that because morality-ethics cannot be taught, people either have it or they don't.
What is this supporting evidence? It is simply that there appear to be exactly three central "trunks" or nodes of human mitchondrial DNA (mtDNA) --- which is exactly what one would expect given the Bible's account of the Flood (three females leading to all humans alive today). But it doesn't end there. From the article:
Fudge those numbers 10%, 20% or even 100% if you like, you'll get thousands of years, never millions of years.
So again, this isn't going to prove the case for Biblical Creationism, but it does provide some fairly strong
evidence supporting it -- evidence that the less-than-honest deniers vehemently claim "does not exist".
The article concludes:
Sorry to once again rain on your parade. Hehe .....
Complete article here: http://www.icr.org/article/9400
Jorge
.
Even MORE [sigh] "non-existent" supporting evidence for Biblical Creationism. The "sigh" is because of the fanatical denials claiming "there is no evidence for Biblical Creationism" when the fact of the matter is that there is an abundance of supporting evidence. What IS lacking is the honesty of the deniers to admit that this abundant supporting evidence does in fact exist. Examples of that are plentiful right here on TWeb by ... well, let's not embarrass anyone by calling out their names. In any event, nothing can be done about that because morality-ethics cannot be taught, people either have it or they don't.
What is this supporting evidence? It is simply that there appear to be exactly three central "trunks" or nodes of human mitchondrial DNA (mtDNA) --- which is exactly what one would expect given the Bible's account of the Flood (three females leading to all humans alive today). But it doesn't end there. From the article:
Fudge those numbers 10%, 20% or even 100% if you like, you'll get thousands of years, never millions of years.
So again, this isn't going to prove the case for Biblical Creationism, but it does provide some fairly strong
evidence supporting it -- evidence that the less-than-honest deniers vehemently claim "does not exist".
The article concludes:
Sorry to once again rain on your parade. Hehe .....
Complete article here: http://www.icr.org/article/9400
Jorge
Comment