Originally posted by shunyadragon
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Apologetics 301 Guidelines
If you think this is the area where you tell everyone you are sorry for eating their lunch out of the fridge, it probably isn't the place for you
This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.
Forum Rules: Here
This forum is open discussion between atheists and all theists to defend and debate their views on religion or non-religion. Please respect that this is a Christian-owned forum and refrain from gratuitous blasphemy. VERY wide leeway is given in range of expression and allowable behavior as compared to other areas of the forum, and moderation is not overly involved unless necessary. Please keep this in mind. Atheists who wish to interact with theists in a way that does not seek to undermine theistic faith may participate in the World Religions Department. Non-debate question and answers and mild and less confrontational discussions can take place in General Theistics.
Forum Rules: Here
See more
See less
Story of creation: Genesis.
Collapse
X
-
More to follow . . .
Originally posted by https://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/febible.htm
The Flat-Earth Bible
© 1987, 1995 by Robert J. Schadewald
Reprinted from The Bulletin of the Tychonian Society #44 (July 1987)
When I first became interested in the flat-earthers in the early 1970s, I was surprised to learn that flat-earthism in the English-speaking world is and always has been entirely based upon the Bible. I have since assembled and read an extensive collection of flat-earth literature. The Biblical arguments for flat-earthism that follow come mainly from my reading of flat-earth literature, augmented by my own reading of the Bible.
Except among Biblical inerrantists, it is generally agreed that the Bible describes an immovable earth. At the 1984 National Bible-Science Conference in Cleveland, geocentrist James N. Hanson told me there are hundreds of scriptures that suggest the earth is immovable. I suspect some must be a bit vague, but here are a few obvious texts:
1 Chronicles 16:30: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable.”
Psalm 93:1: “Thou hast fixed the earth immovable and firm ...”
Psalm 96:10: “He has fixed the earth firm, immovable ...”
Psalm 104:5: “Thou didst fix the earth on its foundation so that it never can be shaken.”
Isaiah 45:18: “...who made the earth and fashioned it, and himself fixed it fast...”
Suffice to say that the earth envisioned by flat-earthers is as immovable as any geocentrist could desire. Most (perhaps all) scriptures commonly cited by geocentrists have also been cited by flat-earthers. The flat-earth view is geocentricity with further restrictions.Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cerebrum123 View PostNone of this has to do with the description given in Genesis. It doesn't have an exact description of size, all that it says is that the heavens are "vast". Again, you are making a conflict where none exists.Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View PostWhere does it say the Heavens are vast?Last edited by firstfloor; 03-06-2014, 04:28 PM.“I think God, in creating man, somewhat overestimated his ability.” ― Oscar Wilde
“And if there were a God, I think it very unlikely that He would have such an uneasy vanity as to be offended by those who doubt His existence” ― Bertrand Russell
“not all there” - you know who you are
Comment
-
Originally posted by firstfloor View PostA couple or three translations of Genesis 2:1 has "vast array" instead of "all their host". Paula Fredriksen explains the Ptolemaic cosmos pretty well in a couple of her lectures. Earth at the centre was the worst place to be.Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MaxVel View PostPerhaps if you stopped trying the read the Genesis account as if it was an attempt at a modern scientific description of creation - which it isn't - you might not find so much fault with it.
I think the point of the account is to show God as supreme, Creator and Maker of all - perhaps as a counterpart to contemporary creation myths.
In my own early days as a Christian I saw a conflict between what I read in Genesis and what I knew of science. Not being able to clear up this apparent discrepancy I choose to believe that it was accurate, but that I could not understand it. It was not until I ran into Hugh Ross at our Southern Baptist Church in Chugiak, Alaska that I came to the OEC position. I do not necessarily agree with every thing Hugh says, but I do agree with one thing. I am convinced that God's revelations in Scripture and nature do not, will not, and cannot contradict each other. God is the author of both the Bible and of the creation.Last edited by Jedidiah; 03-06-2014, 05:38 PM.Micah 6:8 He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?
Comment
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View PostThe problem with Genesis is that it was believed literally by Orthodox Christianity for most of it's history, and the problematic controversy of it's literal 'truth' was only confronted by the progress of 'secular' scientific knowledge. A sizable number if not most Christians in the USA, and many Muslims still believe in a literal Genesis.
Originally posted by shunyadragon View PostThe problems of a literal Genesis are overwhelming, including the relatively small size of our universe, and an awkward young scenario of the creation of our solar system.Micah 6:8 He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?
Comment
-
Originally posted by shunyadragon View PostWhere does it say the Heavens are vast?Micah 6:8 He has told you, O man, what is good; and what does the LORD require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jedidiah View PostActually the Genesis account can be and has been read as consistent with modern scientific description.
Originally posted by JedidiahAccording to the Reasons To Believe web which site says of Hugh Ross (of Old Earth infamy) " Prompted by curiosity, he studied the world’s religions and "holy books" and found only one book that proved scientifically and historically accurate: the Bible." Hugh was not raised as a Christian, but as a scientist.
In my own early days as a Christian I saw a conflict between what I read in Genesis and what I knew of science. Not being able to clear up this apparent discrepancy I choose to believe that it was accurate, but that I could not understand it. It was not until I ran into Hugh Ross at our Southern Baptist Church in Chugiak, Alaska that I came to the OEC position. I do not necessarily agree with every thing Hugh says, but I do agree with one thing. I am convinced that God's revelations in Scripture and nature do not, will not, and cannot contradict each other. God is the author of both the Bible and of the creation....>>> Witty remark or snarky quote of another poster goes here <<<...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jedidiah View PostWhere do you get the idea that the Genesis account relates to just this galaxy? Your time frame is okay, but how does that suggest our galaxy as opposed to everything as the account states?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jedidiah View PostWell the stars are uncountable. That is pretty vast. My question to you is where do you find in the Bible the idea that creation is small?Last edited by shunyadragon; 03-06-2014, 08:22 PM.Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jedidiah View Post
The problem disappears if you remove infallibility from the adherents of "Orthodox (sic) Christianity for most of it's history." I do not see the faulty interpretation of Genesis by early Christian (or anyone else) as demonstrating a flaw in the Bible. The flaw is in the interpretation. I believe the Genesis account is literally true, but I also accept the data found by modern science. No problem.Last edited by shunyadragon; 03-06-2014, 08:56 PM.Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MaxVel View PostPerhaps if you stopped trying the read the Genesis account as if it was an attempt at a modern scientific description of creation - which it isn't - you might not find so much fault with it.
I think the point of the account is to show God as supreme, Creator and Maker of all - perhaps as a counterpart to contemporary creation myths.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jedidiah View PostActually the Genesis account can be and has been read as consistent with modern scientific description. According to the Reasons To Believe web which site says of Hugh Ross (of Old Earth infamy) " Prompted by curiosity, he studied the world’s religions and "holy books" and found only one book that proved scientifically and historically accurate: the Bible." Hugh was not raised as a Christian, but as a scientist.
In my own early days as a Christian I saw a conflict between what I read in Genesis and what I knew of science. Not being able to clear up this apparent discrepancy I choose to believe that it was accurate, but that I could not understand it. It was not until I ran into Hugh Ross at our Southern Baptist Church in Chugiak, Alaska that I came to the OEC position. I do not necessarily agree with every thing Hugh says, but I do agree with one thing. I am convinced that God's revelations in Scripture and nature do not, will not, and cannot contradict each other. God is the author of both the Bible and of the creation.Last edited by shunyadragon; 03-06-2014, 08:35 PM.Glendower: I can call spirits from the vasty deep.
Hotspur: Why, so can I, or so can any man;
But will they come when you do call for them? Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1, Act III:
go with the flow the river knows . . .
Frank
I do not know, therefore everything is in pencil.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 37818 View PostYou are arguing an interpretation. The material that makes up the Sun would have been there with its Earth and its debris in orbit, along with all the other matter which makes of the solar system.
Comment
Related Threads
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by Hypatia_Alexandria, Yesterday, 08:31 AM
|
15 responses
74 views
0 likes
|
Last Post Today, 09:46 AM | ||
Started by Neptune7, 04-15-2024, 06:54 AM
|
25 responses
148 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by Cerebrum123
Yesterday, 08:31 AM
|
||
Started by whag, 04-09-2024, 01:04 PM
|
102 responses
551 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by whag
Today, 04:07 PM
|
||
Started by whag, 04-07-2024, 10:17 AM
|
39 responses
251 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by tabibito
04-12-2024, 02:58 PM
|
||
Started by whag, 03-27-2024, 03:01 PM
|
154 responses
1,017 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by whag
04-12-2024, 12:39 PM
|
Comment