-
June 30th 2008, 05:57 AM #76
Re: "You Quoted Out Of Context" - debunked
I see I missed an element of this. Narinian wrote:
I'm glad Freiling knows so much about what a Muslim experiences in a mosque. Has he ever heard of salat? Does he know how a Muslim experiences the presence of God when he does salat or hears the reading of the Qur'an?[Freiling says that reading from the NT is the first part of Christian divine service, followed by the sacrements, then the experience of the presence of Christ. The divine service in the mosque stops at the first part - at the reading from the Koran.
Or do Christians imagine they have so much of a monopoly on the Holy Spirit that they are the only ones to experience God's Presence?
The Hands of God are not tied up!
-
June 30th 2008, 06:20 AM #77
Re: "You Quoted Out Of Context" - debunked
Brilliant analogy Dan!!A good and useful analogy illustrating this follows.
On a ship sinking in the middle of the ocean, tossed to and fro by the gale winds of a typhoon and having lost its anchor. Suddenly this broken ship lists to one side and almost all its passengers fall into the churning ocean waves!
Screaming and shouting for their dear lives, these poor hapless victoms cry out for help in distress.
One voice tries to help, from somebody on the slanting deck, hooting: "Here, take this Manual, and try hard as possible to save yourself!" And flings a book on 'How to Swim' to the helpless souls almost drowning among the boiling waves!
"You stupid fool" Came another voice from someone who saw this desperate act of fool hardiness.."How can they learn to swim NOW in the churning waves if this typhoon filled sea!"
"Its OKAY," came another voice, booming through the gale winds and the thunder and lightning, "My friend and I are both qualified Life-guards, and we will save as many of those drowning folks as possible!
And having said that, these 2 men promptly jumped into the broiling sea and saved as many drowning victims as they could!
This is what islam does, it throws the 'How to Swim' manual to helpless drowning souls in the trials and tests of life! And instructs them to learn how to swim when it is too late for these souls to do so.
These victims do not need another 'Swimming Guide' or Manual! They have no time to do that, they are all caught up in the whirlpool of death and drowning..!
And, yes, Jesus is the "Basar" - a Hebrew word meaning BOTH word AND flesh."A man who professes an external law is like someone standing in the light of a lantern fixed to a post. It is light all round him, but there is nowhere further for to walk. A man who professes the teachings of Christ is like a man carrying a lantern before him on a long, or not so long, pole; the light is in front of him, always lighting up fresh ground and always encouraging him to walk further." Leo Tolstoy
-
June 30th 2008, 09:52 AM #78
Re: "You Quoted Out Of Context" - debunked
Before I continue, Susan, I would like you to answer these questions:
Is the Quran inerrant or not? And the bible; do you believe it is inerrant?"A man who professes an external law is like someone standing in the light of a lantern fixed to a post. It is light all round him, but there is nowhere further for to walk. A man who professes the teachings of Christ is like a man carrying a lantern before him on a long, or not so long, pole; the light is in front of him, always lighting up fresh ground and always encouraging him to walk further." Leo Tolstoy
-
June 30th 2008, 08:50 PM #79
Re: "You Quoted Out Of Context" - debunked
Dear Niriman,
That's a somewhat complicated question from my perspective. I see the Qur'an as more authoritative than the Bible in that it represents revelation given directly to what I would call a Manifestation of God. Aside from those few parts of the Bible which begins with the words, "Thus speaketh the Lord" we don't have that much in the Bible. At the same time, I believe that Jesus central message was preserved in the NT even if we can't be sure that any given passage was His own exact words. But no, I don't regard the Bible as inerrant.
When you ask that question about the Qur'an, I would answer somewhat differently. It depends on what you mean by inerrancy. If by inerrancy you mean there are no grammatical mistakes, historical mistakes or scientific inaccuracies, no I do not believe it is inerrant. I do, however, believe it is mas'um, infallible or immaculate. By that I mean it infallibly represents the Will of God as revealed to Muhammad. There is an interesting dialogue between a Baha'i scholar Mirza Abu'l-Fadl and the Khalif of the Ahmadiyya Muslims. The Khalif asked Mirza Abu'l-Fadl whether the reference to Noah in the Qur'an and the Bible living a thousand years should be taken literally. Mirza Abu'l-Fadl makes the following points about how we treat scripture which I think are extremely important.
"It is clear that the prophets and Manifestations of the Cause of God were sent to guide the
nations, to improve their characters, and to bring the people nearer to their Source and
ultimate Goal. They were not sent as historians, astronomers, philosophers, or natural
scientists. . . . Therefore, the prophets have indulged the people in regard to their historical
notions, folk stories, and scientific principles, and have spoken to them according to these. .
. . A rational human being will therefore have no doubt that those things mentioned in the Holy
Qu'ran, such as how the creation commenced, the debate of the angels, the stories of Adam, of
Satan, and of Noah and the flood, are all realities. These speak of repeated promises to renew
the world and refer to the appointed times for the expiration (through the advent of the primal
Holy Reality and the renewal of divine laws) of the terms allotted to the nations. But from the
point of view of science, it is impermissible for the historian to depend on the literal meaning
of these verses."
For this reason, even though I believe that the Qur'an is more authoritative than the Bible I do not exclude the possibility that the Bible may be more accurate in terms of some of its historical accounts. Really, though, there is no way to know. The stories in the Torah, as you know were all told centuries after the fact. I don't think it matters all that much if a given account (such as the story of the golden calf) is written fifteen hundred years after the fact or only five hundred. I'm going to look at that story for its moral content, not its historical accuracy.
warmest, Susan
-
June 30th 2008, 08:54 PM #80
-
June 30th 2008, 09:17 PM #81
Re: "You Quoted Out Of Context" - debunked
they are probably confusing "besorah" (strong's 1309) with the related word "basar" (1320), which means "good news" (gospel) and is related to the word basar...
"davar" (strongs 1697) seems to be the equivalent of "logos" - but does not seem to have all the meanings of logos (which means much more than 'Word'...)
logos and davar mean word, but logos seems to have even more imbued meaning (logic, standard, etc)
it'd be nice if someone could find us an in-depth source on this matter...
-
June 30th 2008, 10:14 PM #82
Re: "You Quoted Out Of Context" - debunked
Sorry, I meant "gospel" - as in "good news", a euphemism for salvation.I see where it means fliesh. Can you give me a Jewish source which uses the term to mean 'word'?
rXb
Basar - 291 Strong's Number: 1319
Definition
to bear news, bear tidings, publish, preach, show forth
to gladden with good news
to bear news
to announce (salvation) as good news, preach
rXb
Basar - 291a
Definition
flesh, of the body, of humans, of animals
Further explanation:
The Hebrew word for Good news, or gospel, is basar. This word actually has two meanings, good news and flesh. What does good news and flesh have in common? Flesh, or meat, was only eaten on very special occasions, a feast, the arrival of guests or whenever an event occurs that requires a celebration. As you can see these times of good news were associated with the slaughter of an animal and a meal of flesh.
http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/27_goodnews.html
So you can see where the "Jesus as sacrifice" originates.
A few of the verses:
Isaiah 52.7 How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of the messenger who announces peace, who brings good news, who announces salvation
Isa 40:9 Get yourself up on a high mountain, O Zion, bearer of good news, Lift up your voice mightily, O Jerusalem, bearer of good news;
Isa 41:27 And to Jerusalem, 'I will give a messenger of good news.'
Isa 60:6 They will bring gold and frankincense, And will bear good news of the praises of the Lord.
Isa 61:1 The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me, Because the Lord has anointed me To bring good news to the afflicted;
Conclusion:
The gospel is not a book; Christ is the gospel.
But this contradicts Islam, because the "Injeel" ("Gospel" with an arabic greek accent) ONLY refers to a written text which they believe was "sent down".
Quran 7:157 Those who follow the messenger, the Prophet who can neither read nor write, whom they will find written in the Torah and the Gospel
Quran 3.3 He sent down the Law and the Gospel
And just a little extra thing I found that may, or may not, be connected to the above; "Basar" means "light/illumination" in Sanskrit, and Jesus is also referred to as the "light".
Last edited by Narnian; June 30th 2008 at 10:52 PM.
"A man who professes an external law is like someone standing in the light of a lantern fixed to a post. It is light all round him, but there is nowhere further for to walk. A man who professes the teachings of Christ is like a man carrying a lantern before him on a long, or not so long, pole; the light is in front of him, always lighting up fresh ground and always encouraging him to walk further." Leo Tolstoy
-
June 30th 2008, 10:58 PM #83
Re: "You Quoted Out Of Context" - debunked
thanksBut no, I don't regard the Bible as inerrant.
If there are scientific mistakes, then how could it have been "revealed" and "sent down" from an Omniscient God?When you ask that question about the Qur'an, I would answer somewhat differently. It depends on what you mean by inerrancy. If by inerrancy you mean there are no grammatical mistakes, historical mistakes or scientific inaccuracies, no I do not believe it is inerrant.
infallible and inerrant are the same word. If you dont' believe it is inerrant, yet you do believe it is infallible, then you are not being consistent. Please explain in your own words.I do, however, believe it is mas'um, infallible or immaculate."A man who professes an external law is like someone standing in the light of a lantern fixed to a post. It is light all round him, but there is nowhere further for to walk. A man who professes the teachings of Christ is like a man carrying a lantern before him on a long, or not so long, pole; the light is in front of him, always lighting up fresh ground and always encouraging him to walk further." Leo Tolstoy
-
June 30th 2008, 11:45 PM #84
-
July 1st 2008, 03:53 AM #85
Re: "You Quoted Out Of Context" - debunked
Easy, barney, here are some you ran away from:
http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...44&postcount=9
http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...4&postcount=17
http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...6&postcount=30
http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...3&postcount=31
and here:
http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...9&postcount=48
And also here:
http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/index.html
Dan."Theres a God-shaped vacuum in everyone that can only be filled by God Himself!"
Blaise Pascal
-
July 1st 2008, 06:33 AM #86
Re: "You Quoted Out Of Context" - debunked
There was a radio program about this just yesterday. Here are the latest statistics:As to whether there are just as many Christians as Muslims who believe in the inerrancy of scritpure, if you think it is false, then kindly provide some statistics to prove it. I know about 50% of American Christians think the Bible is inerrant.
Paul Comrie-Thomson: It's generally believed that evangelicals make up 25% of the population. You've done the book, you've done the research, what's the true figure?
Christine Wicker: The true figure is closer to 7%.
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/counterpoin...08/2289360.htm
100%Perhaps you can find out what percent of American Muslims believe the same about the Qur'an?
Yes ALL Muslims are fundamentalists, because a central tenet in Islam (as opposed to what non-fundamentalist Christians believe regarding the Bible) is that the Quran is God's eternal, uncreated, infinite and LITERAL word. Many Muslims can ignore many passages of the Quran, but ultimately, they are not being true Muslims: Islam demands the belief that the whole Qu'ran is to be interpreted literally.
This is what Ibn Warraq says about 'fundamentalism' "It is not correct to speak of 'Islamic fundamentalism' as one could speak of 'Christian fundamentalism'... Most Christians have moved away from the literal interpretation of the Bible; thus, one can correctly distinguish between fundamentalist and non-fundamentalist Christians. But Muslims have not moved away from the literal interpretation of the Qur'an: all Muslims, and not just the group that we usually call 'fundamentalists' [namely, jihadists, Shariah proponents, etc.] believe the Qur'an is literally God's word".
Quran is inerrant:
2:2 This is a perfect Book; there is no doubt in it
Sura 4:82 Do they not ponder on the Qur'an? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much discrepancy.
It is perfect:
11.1 (This is) a Scripture the revelations whereof are perfected and then expounded. (It cometh) from One Wise, Informed
20.114 the Qur'an ere its revelation hath been perfected unto thee
CONCLUSION:
Your answer is:
7% of Christians versus 100% of muslims"A man who professes an external law is like someone standing in the light of a lantern fixed to a post. It is light all round him, but there is nowhere further for to walk. A man who professes the teachings of Christ is like a man carrying a lantern before him on a long, or not so long, pole; the light is in front of him, always lighting up fresh ground and always encouraging him to walk further." Leo Tolstoy
-
July 1st 2008, 10:34 AM #87
-
July 1st 2008, 10:41 AM #88
Re: "You Quoted Out Of Context" - debunked
Dear Narinian,
I believe that the quote I gave you from Mirza Abu'l-Fadl explains that. God has to speak to people in a language they understand. He uses stories which are current amont them, whether or not they are precisely accurate in order to make a point in the present.
Not necessarily and certainly not in Arabic. Ma'sum or ismat which usually gets defined as infallibility literally means immaculacy. I don't think this has much to do with propositional errors.[infallible and inerrant are the same word.
I have, but it seems I can't get past your own presuppositions.If you dont' believe it is inerrant, yet you do believe it is infallible, then you are not being consistent. Please explain in your own words.
warmest, Susan
-
July 1st 2008, 10:46 AM #89
Re: "You Quoted Out Of Context" - debunked
Dear Barnasha,
Our Christian friends are most happy to try and come up with them for us, I don't wish to make their job easier. What I'm saying is that they are largely missing the point when they do this, because that is not what revelation is all about.
warmest, Susan
-
July 1st 2008, 10:55 AM #90
Re: "You Quoted Out Of Context" - debunked
your point is duly noted, I asked you because you, like I, don't seem to "take sides" in the imagined "Islam versus Christianity" war they seem to find themselves in.
As such, I appreciate your contributions to the discussion here - not because you are "pro Islam" but because you make good arguments.
I think our Christian friends would be shocked to know how much yours truly evangelizes Jesus and the bible outside of this forum .....
Similar Threads
-
"Astro-Theology" debunked
By nowheretorun in forum Apologetics 301Replies: 1Last Post: July 3rd 2008, 12:31 AM -
the concept of a lack-of-context "argument"
By barnasha in forum IslamReplies: 7Last Post: June 19th 2008, 12:29 PM -
Slate Article Documents Bush Admin "Rape Rooms" claims in context of US prison abuse
By Vorkosigan in forum Civics 101Replies: 59Last Post: May 19th 2004, 05:14 PM -
"Dee Dee, you heretic!": A study in context
By Bib Lit Major in forum Apologetics 301Replies: 4Last Post: July 20th 2003, 05:27 PM -
For "fundaliteralists" (esp. Jim Eisele): The need for context
By Jezz in forum Apologetics 301Replies: 24Last Post: May 20th 2003, 03:15 PM















































































Quote


Stoning Rebellious Children
Today, 06:33 PM in Christianity 201